Hofstede, Schwartz, or managerial perceptions? The effects of different cultural distance measures on establishment mode choices by multinational enterprises

In recent years, scholars have become increasingly critical of Kogut and Singh's [(1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411-432] cultural distance index and of Hofstede's [(1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications] underlying national culture framework. We therefore examine and compare the effects of five cultural distance measures on the choice by multinational enterprises (MNEs) between expanding abroad through greenfield or acquisition. Two of these measures are based on Hofstede (1980), another two on Schwartz [(1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 85-119). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48(1), 12-47], and one on managerial perceptions. Analyzing a sample of foreign expansions by Dutch MNEs and controlling for other factors, we find that high scores on all cultural distance measures significantly increase the likelihood that MNEs choose greenfields, and that the explanatory power of the Hofstede and Schwartz-based measures is comparable, while that of the perceptual one is somewhat lower. We conclude that it may thus be premature to dismiss Hofstede's work as outdated or as inaccurately reflecting national cultures, and to consider Schwartz's framework to be superior.

[1]  Jody Evans,et al.  Psychic Distance and Organizational Performance: An Empirical Examination of International Retailing Operations , 2002 .

[2]  J. Larimo.  Form of investment by Nordic firms in world markets , 2003 .

[3]  R. Caves,et al.  Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis: Preface , 2007 .

[4]  Nancy J. Adler,et al.  Communicating across Cultural Barriers , 1991 .

[5]  M. Porter.  Competition in Global Industries , 1986 .

[6]  J. Brett,et al.  Inter- and Intracultural Negotiation: U.S. and Japanese Negotiators , 1998 .

[7]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments , 1977 .

[8]  S. Schwartz.  A Theory of Cultural Values and Some Implications for Work , 1999 .

[9]  H. Barkema,et al.  International Expansion Through Start-Up or Acquisition: A Learning Perspective , 1998 .

[10]  J. Steenkamp.  The role of national culture in international marketing research , 2001 .

[11]  Freek Vermeulen,et al.  What Differences in the Cultural Backgrounds of Partners Are Detrimental for International Joint Ventures? , 1997 .

[12]  S. Schwartz.  Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[13]  Taewon Suh,et al.  Transaction cost determinants and ownership-based entry mode choice: a meta-analytical review , 2004 .

[14]  W. C. Kim,et al.  Global Strategy and Multinationals' Entry Mode Choice , 1992 .

[15]  John J. Bell.  Single or Joint Venturing?: A Comprehensive Approach to Foreign Entry Mode Choice , 1996 .

[16]  Daniel Sullivan,et al.  Incremental Internationalization: A Test of Johanson and Vahlne's Thesis , 1990 .

[17]  S. Schwartz.  Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. , 1994 .

[18]  Keith D. Brouthers,et al.  Dunning's eclectic theory and the smaller firm: The impact of ownership and locational advantages on the choice of entry-modes in the computer software industry , 1996 .

[19]  Michael A. Hitt,et al.  Advances in international management , 2002 .

[20]  O. Shenkar,et al.  Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences , 2001 .

[21]  Henry W. Lane,et al.  The Psychic Distance Paradox , 1996 .

[22]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Divergence between Archival and Perceptual Measures of the Environment: Causes and Consequences , 1993 .

[23]  Kang Rae Cho,et al.  Revisiting the role of cultural distance in MNC's foreign ownership mode choice: the moderating effect of experience attributes , 2005 .

[24]  Prasad Padmanabhan,et al.  Decision Specific Experience in Foreign Ownership and Establishment Strategies: Evidence from Japanese Firms , 1999 .

[25]  A. Raveh,et al.  National and corporate cultural fit in mergers/acquisition: an exploratory study , 1996 .

[26]  H. Barkema,et al.  Learning Through Acquisitions , 2001 .

[27]  Keith D. Brouthers,et al.  Explaining the National Cultural Distance Paradox , 2001 .

[28]  大前 研一,et al.  The borderless world : power and strategy in the global marketplace , 1994 .

[29]  Daniel P. Sullivan.  Measuring the Degree of Internationalization of a Firm , 1994 .

[30]  A. Roger,et al.  Cultural Context and Social Effectiveness in International Joint Ventures 1 , 1994 .

[31]  Kendall Roth,et al.  Does Subculture Within a Country Matter? A Cross-Cultural Study of Motivational Domains and Business Performance in Brazil , 2001 .

[32]  J. Hennart,et al.  Greenfield vs. Acquisition: The Strategy of Japanese Investors in the United States , 1993 .

[33]  Michael Y. Hu,et al.  An analysis of determinants of entry mode and its impact on performance , 2002 .

[34]  N. Adler.  International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior , 1986 .

[35]  Gregory E. Osland,et al.  A transaction cost perspective on foreign market entry strategies of US and Japanese firms , 1998 .

[36]  F. Mavondo,et al.  Explaining export development through psychic distance , 2000 .

[37]  Prasad Padmanabhan,et al.  Methodological issues in International Business Studies: The case of foreign establishment mode decisions by multinational firms , 1995 .

[38]  Keith D. Brouthers,et al.  Acquisition or greenfield start-up? Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences , 2000 .

[39]  Mario C Zejan.  New Ventures of Acquisitions. The Choice of Swedish Multinational Enterprises , 1990 .

[40]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  A Cross-National Assessment of Acculturative Stress in Recent European Mergers , 1996 .

[41]  Tomasz Lenartowicz,et al.  A Framework for Culture Assessment , 1999 .

[42]  Anne-Wil Harzing,et al.  THE ROLE OF CULTURE IN ENTRY-MODE STUDIES: FROM NEGLECT TO MYOPIA? , 2003 .

[43]  David M. Brock.  Multinational acquisition integration: the role of national culture in creating synergies , 2005 .

[44]  James L. Bowditch,et al.  The Human Side of Mergers and Acquisitions: Managing Collisions Between People, Cultures, and Organizations. , 1990 .

[45]  Leslie E. Palich,et al.  Cultural Diversity and the Performance of Multinational Firms , 1997 .

[46]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Control and Performance in International Joint Ventures , 1997 .

[47]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. , 1996 .

[48]  Soumava Bandyopadhyay,et al.  The Impact of the Cultural Environment on Interfirm Communications , 1993 .

[49]  Anne-Wil Harzing.  Acquisitions versus greenfield investments: international strategy and management of entry modes , 2002 .

[50]  John F. Veiga,et al.  Acculturation in Acquired Organizations: A Force-Field Perspective , 1994 .

[51]  Jan Pieter van Oudenhoven,et al.  Do organizations reflect national cultures? A 10-nation study , 2001 .

[52]  T. Amemiya.  QUALITATIVE RESPONSE MODELS: A SURVEY , 1981 .

[53]  Mikael Søndergaard,et al.  Research Note: Hofstede's Consequences: A Study of Reviews, Citations and Replications , 1994 .

[54]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[55]  Harbir Singh,et al.  The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode , 1988 .

[56]  G. Hofstede.  Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .