Holistic processing in the composite task depends on face size

Holistic processing is a hallmark of face processing. There is evidence that holistic processing is strongest for faces at identification distance 2–10 metres from the observer. However, this evidence is based on tasks that have been little used in the literature and that are indirect measures of holistic processing. We use the composite task—a well validated and frequently used paradigm—to measure the effect of viewing distance on holistic processing. In line with previous work, we find a congruency x alignment effect that is strongest for faces that are close (2 m equivalent distance) than for faces that are further away (24 m equivalent distance). In contrast, the alignment effect for same trials, used by several authors to measure holistic processing, produced results that are difficult to interpret. We conclude that our results converge with previous findings providing more direct evidence for an effect of size on holistic processing.

[1]  G. Meinhardt,et al.  The complete design in the composite face paradigm: role of response bias, target certainty, and feedback , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[2]  Jennifer J. Richler,et al.  Meanings, Mechanisms, and Measures of Holistic Processing , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[3]  Stephane J. M. Rainville,et al.  The effects of spatial frequency overlap on face recognition. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  E. McKone,et al.  Holistic processing for faces operates over a wide range of sizes but is strongest at identification rather than conversational distances , 2009, Vision Research.

[5]  Iain D Gilchrist,et al.  Oculomotor capture by transient events: a comparison of abrupt onsets, offsets, motion, and flicker. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[6]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Revisiting the role of spatial frequencies in the holistic processing of faces. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Guomei Zhou,et al.  Smaller holistic processing of faces associated with face drawing experience , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[9]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Beliefs alter holistic face processing ... if response bias is not taken into account. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[10]  Erin M. Harley,et al.  Why is it easier to identify someone close than far away? , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  Jeremy Wilmer,et al.  Using regression to measure holistic face processing reveals a strong link with face recognition ability , 2013, Cognition.

[12]  E. McKone,et al.  Isolating the special component of face recognition: peripheral identification and a Mooney face. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  R. Rosenthal.  The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results , 1979 .

[14]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Recognizing rotated faces and Greebles: What properties drive the face inversion effect? , 2008 .

[15]  Matthew J. C. Crump,et al.  In Support of a Distinction between Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Control: A Review of the Literature on Proportion Congruent Effects , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[16]  T. Valentine.  Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[17]  I. McLaren,et al.  The Face Inversion Effect—Parts and Wholes: Individual Features and Their Configuration , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Conditions for Facelike Expertise with Objects Becoming a Ziggerin Expert—but Which Type? , 2022 .

[19]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks , 2007, Cognition.

[20]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Why does selective attention to parts fail in face processing? , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing. , 2014, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  G. Yovel,et al.  Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  B. Rossion.  The composite face illusion: A whole window into our understanding of holistic face perception , 2013 .

[24]  B. Rossion.  Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[25]  When intuition fails to align with data: A reply to Rossion (2013) , 2013, Visual cognition.

[26]  S. Bentin,et al.  Priming global and local processing of composite faces: revisiting the processing-bias effect on face perception , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[27]  Daniel C. Krawczyk,et al.  Chess Masters Show a Hallmark of Face Processing with Chess , 2022 .

[28]  K. Verfaillie,et al.  Face inversion impairs holistic perception: evidence from gaze-contingent stimulation. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[29]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[30]  Adam Schmidt,et al.  The put face database , 2008 .

[31]  Jennifer J. Richler,et al.  Other-race effects manifest in overall performance, not qualitative processing style , 2014 .

[32]  Q. Vuong,et al.  The Respective Role of Low and High Spatial Frequencies in Supporting Configural and Featural Processing of Faces , 2005, Perception.

[33]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Perceptual Expertise as a Shift From Strategic Interference to Automatic Holistic Processing , 2011, Current directions in psychological science.

[34]  Rebecca R. Goldstein,et al.  Disrupting perceptual grouping of face parts impairs holistic face processing , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[35]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Faces are "spatial"--holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  M. Tarr,et al.  Training ‘greeble’ experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes , 1998, Vision Research.

[37]  B. Rossion,et al.  Nonlinear relationship between holistic processing of individual faces and picture-plane rotation: evidence from the face composite illusion. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[38]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Orientation tuning of human face processing estimated by contrast matching in transparency displays , 2006, Vision Research.

[39]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Reliability of composite-task measurements of holistic face processing , 2015, Behavior research methods.

[40]  Cindy M. Bukach,et al.  Limits of generalization between categories and implications for theories of category specificity , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[41]  Jennifer J. Richler,et al.  Holistic processing from learned attention to parts. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Should we reject the expertise hypothesis? , 2007, Cognition.

[43]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Holistic Processing Predicts Face Recognition , 2011, Psychological science.

[44]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Inverted faces are (eventually) processed holistically , 2011, Vision Research.

[45]  Jennifer J. Richler,et al.  Becoming a Lunari or Taiyo expert: learned attention to parts drives holistic processing of faces. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.