General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI

This article discusses general modeling of multisubject and/or multisession FMRI data. In particular, we show that a two-level mixed-effects model (where parameters of interest at the group level are estimated from parameter and variance estimates from the single-session level) can be made equivalent to a single complete mixed-effects model (where parameters of interest at the group level are estimated directly from all of the original single sessions' time series data) if the (co-)variance at the second level is set equal to the sum of the (co-)variances in the single-level form, using the BLUE with known covariances. This result has significant implications for group studies in FMRI, since it shows that the group analysis requires only values of the parameter estimates and their (co-)variance from the first level, generalizing the well-established "summary statistics" approach in FMRI. The simple and generalized framework allows different prewhitening and different first-level regressors to be used for each subject. The framework incorporates multiple levels and cases such as repeated measures, paired or unpaired t tests and F tests at the group level; explicit examples of such models are given in the article. Using numerical simulations based on typical first-level covariance structures from real FMRI data we demonstrate that by taking into account lower-level covariances and heterogeneity a substantial increase in higher-level Z score is possible.

[1]  Didier G. Leibovici,et al.  Negative variance problem in fMRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[2]  B. Everitt The Analysis of Repeated Measures: A Practical Review with Examples , 1995 .

[3]  Nan M. Laird,et al.  Using the General Linear Mixed Model to Analyse Unbalanced Repeated Measures and Longitudinal Data , 1997 .

[4]  Satterthwaite Fe An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. , 1946 .

[5]  S Senn,et al.  Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. , 1990, BMJ.

[6]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Temporal Autocorrelation in Univariate Linear Modeling of FMRI Data , 2001, NeuroImage.

[7]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Variance Components , 2003 .

[9]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Functional MRI : an introduction to methods , 2002 .

[10]  N. Laird,et al.  Using the general linear mixed model to analyse unbalanced repeated measures and longitudinal data. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Classical and Bayesian Inference in Neuroimaging: Theory , 2002, NeuroImage.

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Generalisability, Random Effects & Population Inference , 1998, NeuroImage.

[13]  Patrick L. Purdon,et al.  fMRI Noise Variability Across Subjects and Trials: Insights For Noise Estimation Methods , 1998, NeuroImage.

[14]  S. Senn,et al.  Repeated measures in clinical trials: analysis using mean summary statistics and its implications for design. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  On Bias in the Estimation of Autocorrelations for fMRI Voxel Time-Series Analysis , 2003, NeuroImage.

[16]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[18]  Mary J. Lindstrom The Analysis of Repeated Measures , 1992 .

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[20]  F. E. Satterthwaite An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. , 1946, Biometrics.

[21]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A general statistical analysis for fMRI data , 2000, NeuroImage.