The Nature of Strategic Decision Making – Exploiting the Role of Managers' Incremental and Radical Learning

The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of two basic types of learning in contemporary organizations – incremental (knowledge exploitation) and radical learning (knowledge exploration) – in making organization’s strategic decisions. In achieving this goal a conceptual model of influence of learning types on the nature of strategic decision making and their outcomes was formed, on the basis of which the empirical research was conducted, encompassing 54 top managers in large Croatian companies. The paper discusses the nature of organizational learning and decision making at strategic management level. The results obtained are suggesting that there is a relationship between managers' learning type and decision making approaches at strategic management level, as well as there is the interdependence between these two processes with strategic decision making outcomes. Within these results there are interesting insights, such as that the effect of radical learning on analytical decision making approach is significantly weaker and narrower when compared to the effect of incremental learning on the same approach, and that analytical decision making approach does not affect strategic decision making outcomes.

[1]  H. Simon,et al.  Making Management Decisions: the Role of Intuition and Emotion , 1987 .

[2]  Mark Easterby-Smith,et al.  Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization: Developments in Theory and Practice , 1999 .

[3]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision Processes , 1976 .

[4]  Max Visser,et al.  Deutero-Learning in Organizations: A Review and a Reformulation , 2007 .

[5]  Abdul A. Rasheed,et al.  The Relationships between Top Management Demographic Characteristics, Rational Decision Making, Environmental Munificence, and Firm Performance , 2005 .

[6]  John A. Sharp,et al.  STRATEGIC INVESTMENT DECISION-MAKING: COMPLEXITIES, POLITICS AND PROCESSES* , 1991 .

[7]  E. Sadler‐Smith,et al.  The Role of Intuition in Strategic Decision Making , 2009 .

[8]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Ugly Duckling No More: Pasts and Futures of Organizational Learning Research , 1996 .

[9]  Mark A. Mone,et al.  Formal Strategic Analyses and Organizational Performance: Decomposing the Rational Model , 2007 .

[10]  Mark P. Sharfman,et al.  Does Decision Process Matter? A Study Of Strategic Decision-making Effectiveness , 1996 .

[11]  R. Hogarth Deciding Analytically or Trusting your Intuition? The Advantages and Disadvantages of Analytic and Intuitive Thought , 2002 .

[12]  Philip Calvert,et al.  Learning by Design: Building Sustainable Organizations , 2004 .

[13]  Mark Easterby-Smith,et al.  Organizational learning: current debates and opportunities , 1999 .

[14]  J. Ruiz Moreno [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[15]  M. Easterby-Smith Disciplines of Organizational Learning: Contributions and Critiques , 1997 .

[16]  Charles R. Schwenk The Essence of Strategic Decision Making , 1988 .

[17]  T. Betsch,et al.  The routines of decision making , 2005 .

[18]  James G. March,et al.  How Decisions Happen in Organizations , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[19]  Mahmood Nooraie,et al.  Factors Influencing Strategic Decision-Making Processes , 2012 .

[20]  C. Argyris Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. , 1976 .

[21]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[22]  Martin B. Meznar,et al.  The Social Construction of Organizational Learning: Conceptual and Practical Issues in the Field , 1995 .

[23]  Peter Docherty,et al.  Learning by Design: Building Sustainable Organizations , 2003 .

[24]  J. Child,et al.  Influences on strategic decision effectiveness: Development and test of an integrative model , 2007 .