Strategic Clarity in Banking: Role of Top Management-Team Demography

The relationship between the demographic composition of the top management team and strategic clarity was analyzed using data from a sample of retail banks. The demographic characteristics of education, homogeneity in age and tenure, and heterogeneity in educational major and functional background were analyzed. Controlling for organizational size and firms' performance, banks with a clear strategy are characterized by top management teams that are heterogeneous on education major and functional background. These results suggest support for the benefits of cognitive diversity for top managers engaged in strategic decision making.

[1]  H. Simon,et al.  Selective perception: A note on the departmental identifications of executives. , 1958 .

[2]  I. Janis Victims Of Groupthink , 1972 .

[3]  L. R. Hoffman,et al.  Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[4]  A. Lott,et al.  Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: a review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  J. Pearce,et al.  Planned patterns of strategic behavior and their relationship to business-unit performance† , 1988 .

[6]  Thomas R. Hensley,et al.  Victims of Groupthink , 1986 .

[7]  Søren Aggebo,et al.  Kenneth R. Andrews, The Concept of Corporate Strategy, Dow Jones-Irwin, Inc. Homewood, Illinois, 1971, 245 s. , 1972 .

[8]  Marc J. Dollinger,et al.  Environmental Boundary Spanning and Information Processing Effects on Organizational Performance , 1984 .

[9]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The Effects of Departmental Demography on Turnover. , 1982 .

[10]  L. R. Hoffman Homogeneity of member personality and its effect on group problem-solving. , 1959, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[11]  A. Murray Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance , 1989 .

[12]  Michael C. White,et al.  Strategy, CEO Specialization, and Succession , 1987 .

[13]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Business Unit Strategy, Managerial Characteristics, and Business Unit Effectiveness at Strategy Implementation , 1984 .

[14]  M. Wiersema,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change , 1992 .

[15]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  Groups at Work , 1981 .

[16]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups. , 1984 .

[17]  L. Bourgeois Performance and consensus , 1980 .

[18]  Gregory G. Dess Consensus on strategy formulation and organizational performance: Competitors in a fragmented industry , 1987 .

[19]  N. Ryder The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. , 1965, American sociological review.

[20]  Karlene H. Roberts,et al.  Some correlations of communication roles in organizations. , 1979 .

[21]  D. Norburn,et al.  The top management team and corporate performance , 1988 .

[22]  Sydney Finkelstein,et al.  Chief executive compensation: A study of the intersection of markets and political processes , 1989 .

[23]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Porter's (1980) Generic Strategies as Determinants of Strategic Group Membership and Organizational Performance , 1984 .

[24]  D. Norburn Gogos, yoyos and dodos: Company directors and industry performance , 1986 .

[25]  J. Child Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[26]  R. Dewar,et al.  Elite Values Versus Organizational Structure in Predicting Innovation , 1973 .

[27]  Philip Yetton,et al.  An integration of process and decision scheme explanations of group problem solving performance , 1988 .

[28]  P. Rabbit Human information processing , 1977, Nature.

[29]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[30]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. , 1992 .

[31]  J. P. Wanous,et al.  Solution Diversity and the Quality of Groups Decisions , 1986 .

[32]  S. Jackson,et al.  Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? , 1989 .

[33]  H. Triandis,et al.  Member Heterogeneity and Dyadic Creativity , 1965 .

[34]  L. G. Hrebiniak,et al.  Organizational Adaptation: Strategic Choice and Environmental Determinism. , 1985 .

[35]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication , 1989 .

[36]  P. H. Lindsay Human Information Processing , 1977 .

[37]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  Linear probability, logit and probit models , 1984 .

[38]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Turnaround Strategies for Mature Industrial-Product Business Units , 1983 .

[39]  C. C. Snow,et al.  Strategy, Distinctive Competence, and Organizational Performance. , 1980 .