The Swedish version of the STarT MSK Tool: cross-cultural adaption, test–retest reliability, and aspects of validity

[1]  T. Pincus,et al.  Predicting persisting disability in musculoskeletal pain patients with the STarT MSK screening tool: Results from a prospective cohort study. , 2023, Musculoskeletal care.

[2]  D. Christiansen,et al.  The usefulness of the STarT back screening tool and single-item general health measures when predicting future disability in patients with low back pain treated in Danish primary care physiotherapy. , 2023, Musculoskeletal science & practice.

[3]  H. Negahban,et al.  Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the STarT musculoskeletal tool. , 2022, Physiotherapy theory and practice.

[4]  Jonathan C. Hill,et al.  Validation of the German version of the STarT-MSK-Tool: A cohort study with patients from physiotherapy clinics , 2022, PloS one.

[5]  L. Tesio,et al.  Why Questionnaire Scores Are Not Measures , 2022, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[6]  M. Grotle,et al.  Stratifying workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal pain: translation, cross-cultural adaptation and construct validity of the Norwegian Keele STarT MSK tool , 2022, Scandinavian journal of pain.

[7]  T. Pincus,et al.  STarT MSK tool: Translation, adaptation and validation in Hebrew. , 2021, Musculoskeletal care.

[8]  J. Protheroe,et al.  Refinement and validation of a tool for stratifying patients with musculoskeletal pain , 2021, European journal of pain.

[9]  C. Boström,et al.  Are patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) useful in low back pain? Experiences of physiotherapists in primary health care in Sweden. , 2021, Musculoskeletal science & practice.

[10]  C. Terwee,et al.  COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures , 2021, Quality of Life Research.

[11]  M. Pisters,et al.  Validity and reliability of the Dutch STarT MSK tool in patients with musculoskeletal pain in primary care physiotherapy , 2021, PloS one.

[12]  J. Protheroe,et al.  Stratified primary care versus non-stratified care for musculoskeletal pain: findings from the STarT MSK feasibility and pilot cluster randomized controlled trial , 2020, BMC family practice.

[13]  A. Mannion,et al.  Cross-cultural adaption and validation of the Swedish version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low-back pain , 2020, European Spine Journal.

[14]  C. Boström,et al.  Clinical assessment and patient-reported outcome measures in low-back pain – a survey among primary health care physiotherapists , 2019, Disability and rehabilitation.

[15]  P. J. van der Wees,et al.  Development of a standard set of outcome measures for non-specific low back pain in Dutch primary care physiotherapy practices: a Delphi study , 2019, European Spine Journal.

[16]  L. Wiles,et al.  What does best practice care for musculoskeletal pain look like? Eleven consistent recommendations from high-quality clinical practice guidelines: systematic review , 2019, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[17]  Martin Underwood,et al.  Low back pain: a call for action , 2018, The Lancet.

[18]  L M Bouter,et al.  COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures , 2018, Quality of Life Research.

[19]  Joanne L. Jordan,et al.  Effective treatment options for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: A systematic overview of current evidence , 2017, PloS one.

[20]  B. Koes,et al.  Validity and Reproducibility of the STarT Back Tool (Dutch Version) in Patients With Low Back Pain in Primary Care Settings , 2017, Physical therapy.

[21]  D. A. van der Windt,et al.  Generic prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review , 2017, BMJ Open.

[22]  D. A. van der Windt,et al.  Does a modified STarT Back Tool predict outcome with a broader group of musculoskeletal patients than back pain? A secondary analysis of cohort data , 2016, BMJ Open.

[23]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Development and initial cohort validation of the Arthritis Research UK Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) for use across musculoskeletal care pathways , 2016, BMJ Open.

[24]  P. J. van der Wees,et al.  An introduction to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in physiotherapy. , 2015, Physiotherapy.

[25]  E. Stokes,et al.  Direct access and patient/client self-referral to physiotherapy: a review of contemporary practice within the European Union. , 2013, Physiotherapy.

[26]  N. Foster,et al.  Stratified models of care. , 2013, Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology.

[27]  Bernadette A. Thomas,et al.  Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2012, The Lancet.

[28]  C. Terwee,et al.  Identifying generic predictors of outcome in patients presenting to primary care with nonspinal musculoskeletal pain , 2012, Arthritis care & research.

[29]  S. Linton,et al.  Development of a Short Form of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire , 2011, Spine.

[30]  R. Swinkels,et al.  Current use and barriers and facilitators for implementation of standardised measures in physical therapy in the Netherlands , 2011, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[31]  G. Bonsel,et al.  Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) , 2011, Quality of Life Research.

[32]  K. Jordan,et al.  Annual consultation prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems in primary care: an observational study , 2010, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[33]  Jordi Alonso,et al.  The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content , 2010, BMC medical research methodology.

[34]  K. Dunn,et al.  Subgrouping low back pain: A comparison of the STarT Back Tool with the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire , 2010, European journal of pain.

[35]  A. Mannion,et al.  The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective. Part 1: The Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[36]  S. Linton,et al.  Do psychosocial factors predict disability and health at a 3‐year follow‐up for patients with non‐acute musculoskeletal pain? A validation of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire , 2008, European journal of pain.

[37]  C. Terwee,et al.  When to use agreement versus reliability measures. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[38]  J. Sim,et al.  The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. , 2005, Physical therapy.

[39]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. , 2000, Spine.

[40]  S. Linton,et al.  Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain. , 1998, The Clinical journal of pain.

[41]  Paul Solomon,et al.  The think aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes : M. W. Van Someren, Y.F. Barnard, and J.A.C. Sandberg (Knowledge Based Systems Series). Academic Press, San Diego (1994) , 1995 .

[42]  C. McHorney,et al.  Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? , 1995, Quality of Life Research.

[43]  Maarten van Someren,et al.  The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes , 1994 .

[44]  C. Terwee,et al.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[45]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..