Links Among Attachment Dimensions, Affect, the Self, and Perceived Support for Broadly Generalized Attachment Styles and Specific Bonds

Measures of adult attachment reflect both respondents' broadly generalized styles as well as bonds with specific attachment figures. Using Cronbach, Gleser, Nanda, and Rajaratnam's (1972) Multivariate Generalizability analyses, the authors estimated the extent to which correlations among attachment, affect, the self, and perceived social support occurred for both styles and bonds. In two studies, participants rated attachment, affect, the self, and perceived support when thinking about their mothers, fathers, and romantic partners. In both studies, attachment dimensions reflected specific bonds much more so than generalized styles. When correlations reflected specific bonds, both anxious and avoidant dimensions were strongly linked to high negative affect, low positive affect, and low perceived support. In contrast, evidence for links between attachment and affect was inconclusive when correlations reflected generalized styles. Links between attachment and the self depended on the type of self-construct and whether styles or bonds were analyzed.

[1]  W. Cook Understanding attachment security in family context. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  The Internal Working Models Concept: What do we Really know about the Self in Relation to Others? , 2000 .

[3]  P. Noller,et al.  The relationship of adult attachment dimensions to depression and agoraphobia , 2003 .

[4]  N. Collins,et al.  Working models of attachment shape perceptions of social support: evidence from experimental and observational studies. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  M. V. van Aken,et al.  Attachment in Adolescence: , 2004 .

[6]  I. Sarason,et al.  General and relationship-based perceptions of social support: are two constructs better than one? , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  E. Higgins,et al.  Self-discrepancies and emotional vulnerability: how magnitude, accessibility, and type of discrepancy influence affect. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Nigel O'Brian,et al.  Generalizability Theory I , 2003 .

[9]  The measurement of interpersonal sensitivity: Consideration of design, components, and unit of analysis. , 2001 .

[10]  A. Scoboria,et al.  THE INFORMATION USED TO JUDGE SUPPORTIVENESS DEPENDS ON WHETHER THE JUDGMENT REFLECTS THE PERSONALITY OF PERCEIVERS, THE OBJECTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF TARGETS, OR THEIR UNIQUE RELATIONSHIPS , 2004 .

[11]  J. Simpson,et al.  Attachment theory: Basic concepts and contemporary questions: Theory, research, and clinical implications , 2004 .

[12]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Michael A. Becker Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles , 1998 .

[14]  N. Collins,et al.  Working Models of Attachment: New Developments and Emerging Themes. , 2004 .

[15]  Howard G Lavine,et al.  The Relationship between Self-Discrepancies and Affective States: The Moderating Roles of Self-Monitoring and Standpoints on the Self , 2000 .

[16]  Paul R. Yarnold,et al.  Reading and understanding MORE multivariate statistics. , 2000 .

[17]  P. Shaver,et al.  EMERGING CONTROVERSIES , AND UNANSWERED QUESTIONS , 2001 .

[18]  E. Orehek,et al.  Trait and social processes in the link between social support and affect: an experimental, laboratory investigation. , 2006, Journal of personality.

[19]  T. Heatherton,et al.  Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. , 1991 .

[20]  N. Collins,et al.  INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES A Safe Haven: An Attachment Theory Perspective on Support Seeking and Caregiving in Intimate Relationships , 2004 .

[21]  E. Higgins,et al.  Automatic activation of self-discrepancies and emotional syndromes: when cognitive structures influence affect. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  E. Ziegel,et al.  Bootstrapping: A Nonparametric Approach to Statistical Inference , 1993 .

[23]  S. Andersen,et al.  Eliciting facial affect, motivation, and expectancies in transference: significant-other representations in social relations. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  M. H. Davis,et al.  Relationship-specific and global perceptions of social support: associations with well-being and attachment. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[26]  E. Higgins Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. , 1996 .

[27]  Mario Mikulincer,et al.  Attachment style and the mental representation of the self. , 1995 .

[28]  W. Cook A structural equation model of dyadic relationships within the family system. , 1994, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[29]  R. C. Fraley,et al.  A Dynamical Systems Approach to Conceptualizing and Studying Stability and Change in Attachment Security. , 2004 .

[30]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  Interpersonal Sensitivity : Theory and Measurement , 2001 .

[31]  R. Kobak The emotional dynamics of disruptions in attachment relationships: Implications for theory, research, and clinical intervention. , 1999 .

[32]  Phillip R. Shaver,et al.  Security-Based Self-Representations in Adulthood: Contents and Processes. , 2004 .

[33]  J. Bowlby Attachment and loss: retrospect and prospect. , 1969, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[34]  Eva Nick,et al.  The dependability of behavioral measurements: theory of generalizability for scores and profiles , 1973 .

[35]  Amy B. Dickson Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications , 2004 .

[36]  Stephen Hughes Attachment and Loss. Vol. I , 1969, Mental Health.

[37]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  A social relations variance partitioning of dyadic behavior. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  J. Simpson,et al.  Adult attachment and depressive symptoms: An interpersonal perspective: Theory, research, and clinical implications , 2004 .

[39]  T. Strauman Self-discrepancies in clinical depression and social phobia: cognitive structures that underlie emotional disorders? , 1989, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[40]  B. Fehr,et al.  Social-cognitive conceptualization of attachment working models : Availability and accessibility effects , 1996 .

[41]  A. Scoboria,et al.  The relative contribution of trait and social influences to the links among perceived social support, affect, and self-esteem. , 2005, Journal of personality.

[42]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Interpersonal Perception: A Social Relations Analysis , 1988 .

[43]  Kelly A. Brennan,et al.  An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  E.,et al.  Self-Discrepancy : A Theory Relating Self and Affect , 2022 .

[45]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. , 1974 .

[46]  D. Griffin,et al.  Models of the self and other: Fundamental dimensions underlying measures of adult attachment. , 1994 .

[47]  M. Strube Reliability and generalizability theory. , 2000 .

[48]  G. W. Rever Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1. Attachment , 1972 .