Iterative Timing Recovery with the Split-Preamble Strategy for Coded Partial Response Channels

This paper proposes a modified per-survivor iterative timing recovery scheme, which exploits a new split-preamble strategy in conjunction with a per-survivor processing soft-output Viterbi algorithm (PSP-SOVA). The conventional split-preamble strategy places a preamble at the beginning of a data sector and uses it to run a phase-locked loop during acquisition to find an initial phase/frequency offset. However, the proposed scheme splits the preamble into two parts. The first part is placed at the beginning of the data sector, whereas the second part is divided into small clusters, each of which is then embedded uniformly within the data stream. This split preamble is utilized to adjust the branch metric calculation in PSP-SOVA to ensure that the survivor path occurs in a correct direction. Results indicate that the proposed scheme yields a better performance than a conventional receiver with separate timing recovery and turbo equalization, and the iterative timing recovery scheme proposed in [1],[2], especially when the timing jitter is large. In addition, we also show that the proposed scheme can automatically correct a cycle slip much more efficiently than the others.

[1]  Wei Zeng,et al.  Trellis-Based Optimal Baud-Rate Timing Recovery Loops for Magnetic Recording Systems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[2]  Robert G. Gallager,et al.  Low-density parity-check codes , 1962, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[3]  V. Annampedu,et al.  Adaptive algorithms for asynchronous detection of coded servo signals based on interpolation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[4]  Jan W. M. Bergmans,et al.  Digital baseband transmission and recording , 1996 .

[5]  Joachim Hagenauer,et al.  A Viterbi algorithm with soft-decision outputs and its applications , 1989, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 1989, and Exhibition. 'Communications Technology for the 1990s and Beyond.

[6]  Umberto Mengali,et al.  Approximate ML decoding of coded PSK with no explicit carrier phase reference , 1994, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[7]  John R. Barry,et al.  Per-survivor iterative timing recovery for coded partial response channels , 2004, GLOBECOM.

[8]  Harish Viswanathan,et al.  Optimal placement of training for frequency-selective block-fading channels , 2002, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[9]  Paul H. Siegel,et al.  Turbo decoding for PR4: parallel versus serial concatenation , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Communications (Cat. No. 99CH36311).

[10]  G. David Forney,et al.  Maximum-likelihood sequence estimation of digital sequences in the presence of intersymbol interference , 1972, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[11]  John Cocke,et al.  Optimal decoding of linear codes for minimizing symbol error rate (Corresp.) , 1974, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  Pornchai Supnithi,et al.  Bi-directional timing recovery for magnetic recording systems , 2009, TENCON 2009 - 2009 IEEE Region 10 Conference.

[13]  K. Mueller,et al.  Timing Recovery in Digital Synchronous Data Receivers , 1976, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[14]  P. Kovintavewat,et al.  Reduced-complexity per-survivor iterative timing recovery for coded partial response channels , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[15]  M. Fatih Erden,et al.  MAP-Based Timing Recovery for Magnetic Recording , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[16]  J.R. Barry,et al.  Iterative timing recovery , 2004, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[17]  Riccardo Raheli,et al.  The principle of per-survivor processing: a general approach to approximate and adaptive MLSE , 1991, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM '91: Countdown to the New Millennium. Conference Record.

[18]  Roy D. Cideciyan,et al.  A PRML System for Digital Magnetic Recording , 1992, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[19]  B. V. K. Vijaya Kumar,et al.  Extended Kalman Filter Based Acquisition Timing Recovery for Magnetic Recording Read Channels , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[20]  A.R. Nayak,et al.  Optimal placement of training symbols for frequency acquisition: a Crame/spl acute/r-rao bound approach , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[21]  R. Negi,et al.  Pilot Tone Selection For Channel Estimation In A Mobile Ofdm System * , 1998, International 1998 Conference on Consumer Electronics.