Thermodynamic analysis of a gas turbine engine with a rotating detonation combustor

A rotating detonation combustor is a form of “pressure gain combustion” where one or more detonations continuously travel around an annular channel. Pressure gain combustion is a prospective technology being explored to advance gas turbine power plants. These thermodynamic cycles could potentially deliver a performance increase of 20% beyond the current state of the art. However, the combustor operates at extremely unsteady harsh conditions, and the integration of the combustor with the turbomachinery represent unprecedented aero-thermo-structural challenges. At a given instant each stream line experiences a different compression process through the combustor. In contrast to conventional combustors, where a steady approach is valid, in rotating detonation engines the flow particles entering the compressor will be exposed to different processes depending on the relative position of the rotor shaft to the detonation front. Hence, the overall performance assessment requires the development of ad-hoc tools suitable for this new class of combustors, and the modeling of the turbine exposed to supersonic pulsating flows. This paper presents a numerical tool to evaluate precisely the thermodynamic and non-isentropic processes across the entire engine. The NASA’s Toolbox for the Modeling and Analysis of Thermodynamic Systems was used to implement new libraries to help us quantify the benefits of a rotating detonation engine versus the conventional technology equipped with constant pressure combustion. The new developed libraries, based on sets of physics-based principles, replicate the engine components performance. This model should allow the optimization of components with respect to energy availability to enable optimal engine sizing and operation. Finally, the paper presents the pressure ratios for which the rotating detonation based engine outperforms the conventional power plants based on the Brayton cycle.

[1]  Takayuki Kojima,et al.  Numerical estimation of the thrust performance on a rotating detonation engine for a hydrogen–oxygen mixture , 2015 .

[2]  Kailas Kailasanath,et al.  Numerical investigation of the physics of rotating-detonation-engines , 2011 .

[3]  Guillermo Paniagua,et al.  Design and analysis of pioneering high supersonic axial turbines , 2014 .

[4]  Ashok Rao,et al.  An evaluation of advanced combined cycles , 2013 .

[5]  Erik Dahlquist,et al.  On the trade-off between aviation NOx and energy efficiency , 2017 .

[6]  Jorge Sousa,et al.  Entropy Minimization Design Approach of Supersonic Internal Passages , 2015, Entropy.

[7]  D. Goodwin,et al.  Cantera: An Object-oriented Software Toolkit for Chemical Kinetics, Thermodynamics, and Transport Processes. Version 2.2.0 , 2015 .

[8]  Luca Massa,et al.  Rotating detonation wave propulsion: Experimental challenges, modeling, and engine concepts , 2014 .

[10]  S. M. Frolov,et al.  THREE-DIMENSIONAL NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF OPERATION PROCESS IN ROTATING DETONATION ENGINE , 2013 .

[11]  Ian D. Williams,et al.  Direct carbon dioxide emissions from civil aircraft , 2014, Atmospheric Environment.

[12]  Tomas Grönstedt,et al.  First and Second Law Analysis of Future Aircraft Engines , 2013 .

[13]  Erik Dick,et al.  RAISING CYCLE EFFICIENCY BY INTERCOOLING IN AIR-COOLED GAS TURBINES , 2006 .

[14]  Kailas Kailasanath,et al.  Review of Propulsion Applications of Detonation Waves , 2000 .

[15]  S. M. Frolov,et al.  Experimental proof of Zel'dovich cycle efficiency gain over cycle with constant pressure combustion for hydrogen–oxygen fuel mixture , 2015 .

[16]  R. Harrison,et al.  Aircraft engine exhaust emissions and other airport-related contributions to ambient air pollution: A review , 2014, Atmospheric Environment.

[17]  David S. Lee,et al.  Aviation and global climate change in the 21st century , 2009, Atmospheric Environment.

[18]  K. Kailasanath,et al.  Recent Developments in the Research on Rotating-Detonation-Wave Engines , 2017 .

[19]  Konstantinos Kyprianidis,et al.  Optimization Study of an Intercooled Recuperated Aero-Engine , 2013 .

[20]  Robert T. Fievisohn,et al.  Steady-State Analysis of Rotating Detonation Engine Flowfields with the Method of Characteristics , 2017 .

[21]  William H. Heiser,et al.  Thermodynamic Cycle Analysis of Pulse Detonation Engines , 2002 .

[22]  Thomas M. Lavelle,et al.  Toolbox for the Modeling and Analysis of Thermodynamic Systems (T-MATS) User's Guide , 2014 .

[23]  E. Toro,et al.  Restoration of the contact surface in the HLL-Riemann solver , 1994 .