Delegation of authority in research funding to networks: Experiences with a multiple goal boundary organization
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Funtowicz,et al. Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.
[2] C. Leeuwis,et al. Strengthening Agricultural Innovation Capacity: Are Innovation Brokers the Answer? , 2009 .
[3] Laurens Klerkx,et al. Institutionalizing end-user demand steering in agricultural R&D: Farmer levy funding of R&D in The Netherlands , 2008 .
[4] Benedetto Lepori,et al. Between policy and science: Research councils' responsiveness in Austria, Norway and Switzerland , 2007 .
[5] Remo Fernández-Carro,et al. A principal-agent model of public research with a retrospective payoff rule , 2007 .
[6] R. Pielke,et al. The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science , 2007 .
[7] E. McNie. Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature , 2007 .
[8] D. Dalrymple. Setting the agenda for science and technology in the public sector: the case of international agricultural research , 2006 .
[9] Jacqueline E. W. Broerse,et al. Stakeholder participation in health research agenda setting: the case of asthma and COPD research in the Netherlands , 2006 .
[10] Arie Rip,et al. Scientists' coping strategies in an evolving research system: the case of life scientists in the UK , 2006 .
[11] Darrin Durant. Managing expertise: performers, principals, and problems in Canadian nuclear waste management , 2006 .
[12] Andrew Hall,et al. Enhancing agricultural innovation : how to go beyond the strengthening of research systems , 2006 .
[13] S. Raman. Institutional perspectives on science-policy boundaries , 2005 .
[14] C. Waterton. Scientists' conceptions of the boundaries between their own research and policy , 2005 .
[15] Boundary work in contemporary science policy: A review , 2005 .
[16] J. Sumberg. Systems of innovation theory and the changing architecture of agricultural research in Africa , 2005 .
[17] N. Morris. Academic researchers as 'agents' of science policy , 2003 .
[18] E. Shove. Principals, agents and research programmes , 2003 .
[19] Chris Caswill. Principals, agents and contracts , 2003 .
[20] David H. Guston,et al. Principal-agent theory and research policy: An introduction , 2003 .
[21] D. Braun. Lasting tensions in research policy-making — a delegation problem , 2003 .
[22] Stanley J. Paliwoda,et al. Multi-sector collaboration: A stakeholder perspective on a government, industry and university collaborative venture , 2003 .
[23] A. Rip,et al. The ‘user’ in research funding negotiation processes , 2003 .
[24] T. Hellström,et al. Boundary organisations in science: From discourse to construction , 2003 .
[25] David W. Cash,et al. Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[26] Javier M. Ekboir,et al. Research and technology policies in innovation systems: zero tillage in Brazil , 2003 .
[27] B. Emans. Interviewen, theorie, techniek, training , 2003 .
[28] V. Søgaard. Agricultural public-sector research establishments in Western Europe: Research priorities in conflict , 2002 .
[29] David W. Cash,et al. “In Order to Aid in Diffusing Useful and Practical Information”: Agricultural Extension and Boundary Organizations , 2001 .
[30] Andrew Hall,et al. Why Research Partnerships Really Matter: Innovation Theory, Institutional Arrangements and Implications for Developing New Technology for the Poor , 2001 .
[31] H. Odame,et al. Participation in agricultural research planning. , 2001 .
[32] A. Rip,et al. Users and unicorns: a discussion of mythical beasts in interactive science , 2000 .
[33] L. Leydesdorff,et al. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .
[34] D. Guston. David Guston ’ s Between Politics and Science : Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research * , 2000 .
[35] W. Huffman,et al. Setting Efficient Incentives for Agricultural Research: Lessons from Principal‐Agent Theory , 2000 .
[36] David H. Guston,et al. Stabilizing the Boundary between US Politics and Science: , 1999, Social studies of science.
[37] D. Braun,et al. The role of funding agencies in the cognitive development of science , 1998 .
[38] Barend van der Meulen,et al. Science policies as principal-agent games: Institutionalization and path dependency in the relation between government and science , 1998 .
[39] Lawrence Busch,et al. Inquiry for the public good: Democratic participation in agricultural research , 1997 .
[40] David H. Guston,et al. Principal-agent theory and the structure of science policy , 1996 .
[41] W. Lacy. Research, extension, and user partnerships: Models for collaboration and strategies for change , 1996 .
[42] Jenny Stewart,et al. Models of priority-setting for public sector research , 1995 .
[43] Leon A.G. Oerlemans,et al. National Systems of Innovation : Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 2012 .
[44] S. Schwartzman,et al. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .
[45] R. Nelson. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis , 1993 .
[46] D. Braun. Who Governs Intermediary Agencies? Principal-Agent Relations in Research Policy-Making , 1993, Journal of Public Policy.
[47] B. Lundvall. National Systems of Innovation , 1992 .
[48] A. Strauss,et al. Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .
[49] R. Yin. Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .