The X-Ray-to-Optical Properties of Optically Selected Active Galaxies over Wide Luminosity and Redshift Ranges

We present partial-correlation analyses that examine the strengths of the relationships between l2500 A, l2 keV, αOX, and redshift for optically selected active galactic nuclei (AGNs). We extend the work of Strateva and coworkers, which analyzed optically selected AGNs from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), by including 52 moderate-luminosity, optically selected AGNs from the COMBO-17 survey with corresponding deep (≈250 ks to 1 Ms) X-ray observations from the Extended Chandra Deep Field-South. The COMBO-17 survey extends ~3 mag deeper than the SDSS and probes the moderate-luminosity AGNs that numerically dominate the AGN population in the universe. We also include recently published observations of 19 high-redshift, optically selected AGNs and 46 luminous, low-redshift AGNs from the Bright Quasar Survey. The full sample used in our analysis consists of 333 AGNs, extending out to z ~ 6, with 293 (88%) having X-ray detections. The sample spans five decades in UV luminosity and four decades in X-ray luminosity. We confirm that αOX is strongly anticorrelated with l2500 A (13.6 σ), the highest significance found for this relation to date, and find evidence suggesting that the slope of this relation may be dependent on l2500 A. We find that no significant correlation exists between αOX and redshift (1.3 σ) and constrain the maximum evolution of AGN UV-to-X-ray flux ratios to be less than 30% (1 σ) out to z = 5. Using our sample's high X-ray detection fraction, we also find a significant anticorrelation (3.0 σ) between αOX and l2 keV. We make comparisons to earlier studies on this topic and discuss implications for X-ray and optical AGN luminosity functions.

[1]  M. Kendall.  A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION , 1938 .

[2]  C. F. Kossack,et al.  Rank Correlation Methods , 1949 .

[3]  J. Baldwin.  Luminosity Indicators in the Spectra of Quasi-Stellar Objects , 1977 .

[4]  I. James,et al.  Linear regression with censored data , 1979 .

[5]  H. Tananbaum,et al.  On the cosmological evolution of the X-ray emission from quasars , 1982 .

[6]  G. Chanan.  Luminosity correlations in quasars , 1983 .

[7]  Richard F. Green,et al.  Quasar evolution derived from the Palomar bright quasar survey and other complete quasar surveys. , 1983 .

[8]  P. I. Nelson,et al.  Statistical methods for astronomical data with upper limits. I - Univariate distributions , 1985 .

[9]  P. I. Nelson,et al.  Statistical methods for astronomical data with upper limits. II - Correlation and regression , 1986 .

[10]  G. Kriss,et al.  X-ray properties of quasars and results from a deep X-ray survey of optically selected objects , 1985 .

[11]  E. Feigelson,et al.  X-ray and radio core emission in radio quasars , 1986 .

[12]  H. Tananbaum,et al.  X-Ray properties of optically selected QSOs , 1986 .

[13]  M. Malkan,et al.  PG 1411 + 442 - The nearest broad absorption line quasar , 1987 .

[14]  Belinda J. Wilkes,et al.  Quasar energy distributions. I - Soft X-ray spectra of quasars , 1987 .

[15]  Bruce Margon,et al.  The X-ray properties of high-redshift quasi-stellar objects , 1987 .

[16]  P. Giommi,et al.  X-ray studies of quasars with the Einstein Observatory. IV - X-ray dependence on radio emission , 1987 .

[17]  M. Véron-Cetty,et al.  A catalogue of quasars and active nuclei: 11th edition , 1998 .

[18]  J. Dickey,et al.  H I in the Galaxy , 1990 .

[19]  G. J. Babu,et al.  Linear regression in astronomy. II , 1990 .

[20]  W. Duschl,et al.  Physics of Active Galactic Nuclei , 1992 .

[21]  Chris Biemesderfer,et al.  Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems X , 2001 .

[22]  Robert Antonucci,et al.  Unified models for active galactic nuclei and quasars , 1993 .

[23]  M. S. Oey,et al.  THE EINSTEIN DATABASE OF IPC X-RAY OBSERVATIONS OF OPTICALLY SELECTED AND RADIO-SELECTED QUASARS .1. , 1994 .

[24]  R. Ellis,et al.  RX J1759.4+6638: an x-ray selected quasar at a redshift of 4.320 , 1994 .

[25]  P. Hewett,et al.  The Soft X-Ray Properties of a Large Optical QSO Sample: ROSAT Observations of the Large Bright Quasar Survey , 1995 .

[26]  Charles F. Gammie,et al.  Local Three-dimensional Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Accretion Disks , 1995 .

[27]  Michael G. Akritas,et al.  A test for partial correlation with censored astronomical data , 1996 .

[28]  The Relationship between the High-Energy Continuum and Emission Lines in Quasars: A Low-Redshift Sample , 1996, astro-ph/9603099.

[29]  D. Schneider,et al.  Discovery of an X-Ray-selected Quasar with a Redshift of 4.45 , 1998 .

[30]  W. N. Brandt,et al.  On the Nature of Soft X-Ray Weak Quasi-stellar Objects , 1999, astro-ph/9908016.

[31]  E. al.,et al.  The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical summary , 2000, astro-ph/0006396.

[32]  Scott M. Croom,et al.  The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey — I. The optical luminosity function of quasi-stellar objects , 2000 .

[33]  Scott M. Croom,et al.  The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - I. The Optical QSO Luminosity Function , 2000 .

[34]  P. Green,et al.  Quasar Evolution and the Baldwin Effect in the Large Bright Quasar Survey , 2001, astro-ph/0104029.

[35]  E. al.,et al.  Composite Quasar Spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2001, astro-ph/0105231.

[36]  J. Hawley,et al.  A Numerical Method for General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamics , 2002, astro-ph/0210518.

[37]  W. N. Brandt,et al.  X-Ray, Optical, and Infrared Imaging and Spectral Properties of the 1 Ms Chandra Deep Field North Sources , 2002 .

[38]  A. V. Filippenko,et al.  “Hidden” Seyfert 2 Galaxies and the X-Ray Background , 2002 .

[39]  X-ray emission from radio-quiet quasars in the SDSS Early Data Release. The alpha_ox dependence upon UV luminosity , 2002, astro-ph/0211125.

[40]  The near-IR properties and continuum shapes of high redshift quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2003, astro-ph/0308178.

[41]  F. Castander,et al.  High-Redshift X-Ray-Selected Quasars: CXOCY J125304.0−090737 Joins the Club , 2003 .

[42]  Sensitive Observations at 1.4 and 250 GHz of z > 5 QSOs , 2003, astro-ph/0304097.

[43]  L. Cowie,et al.  The Changing Active Galactic Nucleus Population , 2003 .

[44]  M. Giavalisco,et al.  The Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey: Initial results from optical and near-infrared imaging , 2003, astro-ph/0309105.

[45]  F. Castander,et al.  An X-Ray-selected Active Galactic Nucleus at z = 4.6 Discovered by the CYDER Survey , 2004 .

[46]  Takamitsu Miyaji,et al.  Cosmological Evolution of the Hard X-Ray Active Galactic Nucleus Luminosity Function and the Origin of the Hard X-Ray Background , 2003, astro-ph/0308140.

[47]  S. Dye,et al.  The evolution of faint AGN between z ' 1 and z ' 5 from the COMBO-17 survey , 2003 .

[48]  D. M. Alexander,et al.  The Chandra Deep Field North Survey. XIII. 2 Ms Point-Source Catalogs , 2003, astro-ph/0304392.

[49]  Red and Reddened Quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2003, astro-ph/0305305.

[50]  J. Shields,et al.  Chandra survey of radio-quiet, high-redshift quasars , 2002, astro-ph/0204462.

[51]  Chien Y. Peng,et al.  GEMS: Galaxy Evolution from Morphologies and SEDs , 2004 .

[52]  A. Cimatti,et al.  A catalogue of the Chandra Deep Field South with multi-colour classification and photometric redshifts from COMBO-17 , 2004, astro-ph/0403666.

[53]  D. M. Alexander,et al.  The Fall of AGN and the Rise of Star-Forming Galaxies: A Close Look at the Chandra Deep Field X-ray Number , 2004 .

[54]  Oxford,et al.  The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey – XII. The spectroscopic catalogue and luminosity function , 2004, astro-ph/0403040.

[55]  P. Capak,et al.  An Optical Catalog of the Chandra Large Area Synoptic X-Ray Survey Sources , 2004, astro-ph/0409088.

[56]  U. Southampton,et al.  A Brief Review of Long-Term X-Ray and Optical Variability in Radio-Quiet AGN(Session 5 : Evidence for Giant Black Holes) , 2004, astro-ph/0402407.

[57]  H. Tananbaum,et al.  Hard X-Ray-emitting Active Galactic Nuclei Selected by the Chandra Multiwavelength Project , 2004 .

[58]  R. F. Mushotzky,et al.  THE CHANDRA LARGE AREA SYNOPTIC X-RAY SURVEY (CLASXS) OF THE LOCKMAN HOLE-NORTHWEST: THE X-RAY CATALOG , 2004 .

[59]  Magnetically Driven Accretion Flows in the Kerr Metric. IV. Dynamical Properties of the Inner Disk , 2004, astro-ph/0409231.

[60]  J. Silverman,et al.  Comoving Space Density of X-Ray-selected Active Galactic Nuclei , 2004, astro-ph/0406330.

[61]  D. Berk,et al.  Soft X-Ray and Ultraviolet Emission Relations in Optically Selected AGN Samples , 2005, astro-ph/0503009.

[62]  P. Ciliegi,et al.  The HELLAS2XMM Survey. VII. The Hard X-Ray Luminosity Function of AGNs up to z = 4: More Absorbed AGNs at Low Luminosities and High Redshifts , 2005, astro-ph/0509081.

[63]  Princeton,et al.  The Sloan Digital Sky Survey View of the Palomar-Green Bright Quasar Survey , 2005, astro-ph/0506022.

[64]  D. M. Alexander,et al.  The Extended Chandra Deep Field-South Survey: Chandra Point-Source Catalogs , 2005, astro-ph/0506607.

[65]  The X-Ray Spectral Properties and Variability of Luminous High-Redshift Active Galactic Nuclei , 2005, astro-ph/0505482.

[66]  P. Capak,et al.  The Cosmic Evolution of Hard X-Ray-selected Active Galactic Nuclei , 2004, astro-ph/0410527.

[67]  P. O’Brien,et al.  XMM-Newton spectroscopy of high-redshift quasars , 2005, astro-ph/0508524.

[68]  A. Myers,et al.  The 2dF-SDSS LRG and QSO (2SLAQ) survey: the z < 2.1 quasar luminosity function from 5645 quasars to g=21.85 , 2005, astro-ph/0504300.

[69]  D. Schneider,et al.  X-Ray Lighthouses of the High-Redshift Universe. II. Further Snapshot Observations of the Most Luminous z≳4 Quasars with Chandra , 2005, astro-ph/0503301.

[70]  G. Hasinger,et al.  Luminosity-dependent evolution of soft X-ray selected AGN : New Chandra and XMM-Newton surveys , 2005, astro-ph/0506118.