Good-enough representation in plural and singular pronominal reference: Modulating the Conjunction Cost

When two individuals have been linked by a connective, a complex reference object is formed, and subsequent reference by plural anaphors rather than singular ones is preferred. Two reading time and one text change detection study were carried out to examine further the details of the representation of singular and plural objects under these circumstances. The normal conjunction cost associated with subsequently referring to one of the individuals by a singular pronoun is eliminated in circumstances where for the purposes of communication there is nothing to be gained from a singular/plural distinction. The findings fit with current views of shallow, good-enough processing, in which semantic distinctions in mental representations are only made when functionally necessary.

[1]  Christopher Habel,et al.  Representing referents of plural expressions and resolving plural anaphors , 2002 .

[2]  Simon Garrod,et al.  The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension. , 1998 .

[3]  Sungryong Koh,et al.  Resolution of the antecedent of a plural pronoun , 2002 .

[4]  Patrick Sturt,et al.  Production and comprehension measures in assessing plural object formation , 2004 .

[5]  A. Sanford,et al.  Depth of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  Anthony J. Sanford,et al.  Constraints on the formation of plural reference objects: The influence of role, conjunction, and type of description , 2004 .

[7]  A Pollatsek,et al.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  Christopher Habel,et al.  Remarks on Plural Anaphora , 1989, EACL.

[9]  S. Garrod,et al.  THE MENTAL REPRESENTATION OF DISCOURSE IN A FOCUSSED MEMORY SYSTEM: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF ANAPHORIC NOUN PHRASES , 1982 .

[10]  Charles Clifton,et al.  Accessing singular antecedents in conjoined phrases , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[11]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  Wietske Vonk,et al.  The use of referential expressions in structuring discourse , 1992 .

[13]  Eugene J. Dawydiak,et al.  Linguistic focus and good-enough representations: An application of the change-detection paradigm , 2004, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[14]  C. Clifton,et al.  The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .

[15]  A. J. Sanford,et al.  Notes on Plural Reference and the Scenario-Mapping Principle in Comprehension , 1995 .

[16]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[17]  Karl G. D. Bailey,et al.  Good-Enough Representations in Language Comprehension , 2002 .