Bursty research topic detection from scholarly data using dynamic Co-word networks: A preliminary investigation

Discovering emerging research topics from scholarly data is crucial to facilitate the understanding of trends and history of a target field. In a traditional science mapping approach, a co-word network, which shows the co-occurrence relationship between words, is depicted using a set of papers published in each of time periods. To identify bursty research topics in dynamic co-word networks, as a preliminary investigation, this paper proposes to introduce a scheme that identifies sudden increase in frequency of each word pair. Specifically, we first apply a burst detection model to a time-series of edge weights in the networks, and then reconstruct a network that consists of bursty word co-occurrences for each time period. To show the effectiveness of the proposed framework, we present a case study on conference papers in the fields of information retrieval, data mining, and WWW. The results of the experiments demonstrate that our method can reflect the research trend as compared with original co-word networks.

[1]  Wei Lu,et al.  Analyzing evolution of research topics with NEViewer: a new method based on dynamic co-word networks , 2014, Scientometrics.

[2]  Min Song,et al.  Analyzing topic evolution in bioinformatics: investigation of dynamics of the field with conference data in DBLP , 2014, Scientometrics.

[3]  Xiang Ji,et al.  Topic evolution and social interactions: how authors effect research , 2006, CIKM '06.

[4]  James Caverlee,et al.  PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  Brian Sloan,et al.  European research policy and bibliometric indicators, 1990–2005 , 2010, Scientometrics.

[6]  Qi He,et al.  Using Burstiness to Improve Clustering of Topics in News Streams , 2007, Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2007).

[7]  C. López-Pujalte,et al.  An overview of animal science research 1945-2011 through science mapping analysis. , 2015, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[8]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Mining Online Social Data for Detecting Social Network Mental Disorders , 2016, WWW.

[9]  Hideaki Takeda,et al.  Interdisciplinary Collaborator Recommendation Based on Research Content Similarity , 2017, IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Michael Ley,et al.  DBLP - Some Lessons Learned , 2009, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[11]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[12]  Weimao Ke,et al.  Studying the emerging global brain: Analyzing and visualizing the impact of co-authorship teams , 2005, Complex..

[13]  Hideaki Takeda,et al.  Topic Representation of Researchers' Interests in a Large-Scale Academic Database and Its Application to Author Disambiguation , 2015, IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst..

[14]  John D. Lafferty,et al.  Dynamic topic models , 2006, ICML.

[15]  Qingqi Hong,et al.  Topic evolution based on LDA and HMM and its application in stem cell research , 2014, J. Inf. Sci..