Increasing student confidence and motivation in a project-based Machine Construction and Mechatronics course

This paper describes an exercise project implemented in a 7th semester mechatronics course for mechanical engineers. Its intention is to teach technical know-how, theoretical understanding, practical experience and to increase confidence in the students. This is achieved by encouraging exploration, practical work and to let the students’ experience achievement in a new subject early in the semester. The project spanned over 4 four weeks and the task was to build an Arduino based robot that reacts on input from minimum two sensors. Previous years‘ exercise routine has been a teacher driven activity that left little creative freedom for the students. However, by adopting ideas from both project-based learning (PBL) and design thinking (DT) the focus has changed. Creative confidence or creative self-efficacy is one of the most important aspects for the students to develop, along with a good understanding of the theory. As an experiment, we incorporated these elements in the exercise routine of the course. The intent was to increase the students’ confidence in the theoretical elements of the course and in their abilities to solve relevant problems. There were 71 students in the course with a gender distribution of 59 male and 12 female. Measurements were done using a questionnaire (n=43) answered just after the project was finished, 36 male and 7 female. The results presented in this paper are based on dichotomous items from the questionnaire. The descriptive results show an increase of motivation for learning mechatronics (88.4%), increased confidence in translating theory to practice (79.1%) and high satisfaction on individual performance in the project (82.9%). This indicates that the project was successful. The complete dataset and the exercise project is discussed further in the full paper.

[1]  Moti Frank,et al.  Implementing the Project-Based Learning Approach in an Academic Engineering Course , 2003 .

[2]  John W. Thomas,et al.  A REVIEW OF RESEARCH ON PROJECT-BASED LEARNING , 2000 .

[3]  Roger Hadgraft,et al.  Engineering Education and the Development of Expertise , 2011 .

[4]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[5]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  Paper Robot: A Design Activity to Increase Beginner’s Prototyping Confidence with Microcontrollers , 2015 .

[6]  M. Jollands,et al.  Project-based learning as a contributing factor to graduates’ work readiness , 2012 .

[7]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project‐Oriented Capstone Courses , 1997 .

[8]  Ronald A. Beghetto,et al.  Creative Self-Efficacy: Correlates in Middle and Secondary Students , 2006 .

[9]  Maryam Khanbaghi,et al.  A competition-based approach for undergraduate mechatronics education using the arduino platform , 2014, Fourth Interdisciplinary Engineering Design Education Conference.

[10]  Trevor Davies,et al.  Confidence! Its Role in the Creative Teaching and Learning of Design and Technology , 2000 .

[11]  Marsha C. Lovett,et al.  How learning works , 2010 .

[12]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[13]  C. Meinel,et al.  Design Thinking: An Educational Model , 2010 .

[14]  P. Christensen,et al.  Problem-oriented and project-based learning (POPBL) as an innovative learning strategy development in engineering education , 2008 .

[15]  P. Pintrich.  A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. , 2003 .

[16]  Martin Lehmann,et al.  Problem-oriented and project-based learning (POPBL) as an innovative learning strategy for sustainable development in engineering education , 2008 .

[17]  P H Abelson,et al.  Engineering education. , 1985, Science.

[18]  C. Meinel,et al.  Design Thinking: An Educational Model towards Creative Confidence , 2010 .

[19]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[20]  Daniel D. Frey,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2006 .