User satisfaction with system,decision process,and outcome in GDSS based meeting: an experimental investigation

Performance of groups using group decision support systems (GDSS) has been an issue debated over the last two decades. Yet, there is need for more focused research on subjective variables such as the satisfaction of team members with the experience of using a GDSS. This research focuses on different types of user satisfaction in GDSS based meetings: system satisfaction, process satisfaction, and outcome satisfaction; and explores interrelationships among them. The findings from a laboratory experiment demonstrate that group members¿ satisfaction with system impacts the satisfaction with decision process and outcome. Satisfaction with decision outcome is also influenced by satisfaction with decision making process. Another interesting set of findings is the relationships between performance of groups members engaged in GDSS based meetings and their satisfaction with system, process, and outcome. Decision time has negative effect on system satisfaction and positive effect on process satisfaction. Thoroughness of decision making has positive effect on outcome satisfaction. The findings of the research have major implications for planners and facilitators of GDSS based meetings.

[1]  Dimensions of satisfaction in teleconferencing: an exploratory analysis , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[2]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Getting a Clue , 1996 .

[3]  Bertrand Belzile,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, par Richard M. Cyert et James G. March, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 pages. , 1964 .

[4]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[5]  Kishore Sengupta,et al.  Cognitive Feedback in GDSS: Improving Control and Convergence , 1993, MIS Q..

[6]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Affective Reward and the Adoption of Group Support Systems: Productivity Is Not Always Enough , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Blake Ives,et al.  The measurement of user information satisfaction , 1983, CACM.

[8]  J. Nunnally Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[9]  Uday S. Murthy,et al.  Decision making performance of interacting groups: an experimental investigation of the effects of task type and communication mode , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[10]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  User satisfaction with computer-mediated communication systems , 1990 .

[11]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  An empirical study of task type and communication medium in GDSS , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[12]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Group Support Systems: A Descriptive Evaluation of Case and Field Studies , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Beth H. Jones,et al.  Impact of Communication Medium and Computer Support on Group Perceptions and Performance: A Comparison of Face-to-Face and Dispersed Meetings , 1993, MIS Q..

[14]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Stakeholder identification and assumption surfacing in small groups: an experimental study , 1989, [1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track.

[15]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[16]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Kate M. Kaiser,et al.  Using a voice-synchronous GDSS in dispersed locations: a preliminary analysis of participant satisfaction , 1991, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[18]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  An Approximate Measure of Value , 1954, Oper. Res..

[19]  Bolanle A. Olaniran,et al.  Group Performance in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Communication Media , 1994 .

[20]  Wei Huang,et al.  Why does a GSS fail to enhance group consensus and satisfaction? An investigation from an influence process perspective , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[21]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[22]  Bruce A. Reinig,et al.  Toward an Understanding of Satisfaction with the Process and Outcomes of Teamwork , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  Devil's Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry Effects on Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1995 .

[24]  P Iz,et al.  An interactive group decision aid for multiobjective problems: An empirical assessment , 1990 .

[25]  William R. King,et al.  The Development of a Measure for End-User Computing Support , 1994 .

[26]  Sammy W. Pearson,et al.  Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .

[27]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  A theory and measurement of meeting satisfaction , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[28]  R. F. Powers,et al.  MisProject Management: Myths, Opinions, and Reality , 1973 .

[29]  James D. McKeen,et al.  Enhancing Computer-Mediated Communication: An experimental investigation into the use of a Group Decision Support System for face-to-face versus remote meetings , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[30]  Minder Chen,et al.  Integrating group support systems, joint application development, and computer-aided software engineering for requirements specification , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[31]  J. McGrath Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[32]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[33]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision Processes , 1976 .

[34]  K R MacCrimmon,et al.  Decisionmaking among Multiple-Attribute Alternatives: A Survey and Consolidated Approach , 1968 .