Assessment of soil spatial variability at multiple scales

Abstract Quantification of soil spatial variability across multiple scales is important in ecological modeling, environmental prediction, precision agriculture, and natural resources management. This study investigates the variability of soil map units and soil properties at multiple scales using two case studies, and demonstrates that soil spatial variability is a function of map scale, spatial location, and specific soil property. In the first case study, the variability of soil components within a map unit, termed map unit purity, was examined at three orders of soil surveys in the Backswamp Watershed in South Carolina. Soil maps of Order I (1:7920), Order II (1:24,000) and Order IV (1:250,000) were independently obtained and examined in a Geographic Information System (GIS). The results showed that the area-weighted mean purity P m for the Order II soil map when compared to the Order I delineations was 51–99% for soil taxonomic units (soil series to order) and 65–85% for soil properties important for land management in the area (texture, structure, surface thickness, hydrologic group, and drainage class). Corresponding values of P m for the Order IV map were 24–81% and 60–90% when compared to the Order II delineations. In the second case study, 324 soil samples were collected across the Minnesota River Basin using a nested hierarchical sampling design that allowed for variability assessment at multiple scales through a hierarchical analysis of variance. A-horizon thickness, depth to calcium carbonate, and surface soil pH values were summarized by soil regions, hillslope positions, clusters, and point scales. The majority of the variability (over 50% in most cases) for all three soil properties was at the local point scale, suggesting that careful examination of short-range soil property variability should not be overlooked. Possible causes of variability ranged from climate at the basin scale to localized effects of differential infiltration and runoff caused by the differences in landscape positions and soil characteristics. We recommend a hierarchical sampling approach similar to the one used in this study to inventory soil spatial variability at multiple scales so that an understanding could be developed not only for soil property variability across the landscape, but also for determining at what scale the variability is most likely to occur.

[1]  L. Wilding,et al.  The Need to Quantify Spatial Variability , 2015 .

[2]  John S. Jacob,et al.  Quantifying Map Unit Composition for Quality Control in Soil Survey , 2015 .

[3]  D. P. Franzmeier,et al.  Saturation, Aeration, and Color Patterns in a Toposequence of Soils in North-central Indiana , 1986 .

[4]  T. Fenton,et al.  Saturated Zones and Soil Morphology in a Mollisol Catena of Central Iowa , 1994 .

[5]  E. Jong,et al.  Regional and catenary variations in properties of Borolls of southern Saskatchewan, Canada. , 1990 .

[6]  Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,et al.  Modelling soil variation: past, present, and future , 2001 .

[7]  W. Edmonds,et al.  Variance and Scale Influences on Classifying and Interpreting Soil Map Units1 , 1985 .

[8]  M. E. Austin.  Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States (exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii) , 1965 .

[9]  P. A. Burrough,et al.  Multiscale sources of spatial variation in soil. I: The application of fractal concepts to nested levels of soil variation , 1983 .

[10]  A. P. Schwab,et al.  Spatial Variability of Nitrogen Mineralization at the Field Scale , 1997 .

[11]  A. McBratney,et al.  Soil spatial variability , 2000 .

[12]  Achim Dobermann,et al.  Scale-dependent correlations among soil properties in two tropical lowland rice fields , 1997 .

[13]  James C. Bell,et al.  Quantitative Soil‐Landscape Modeling for Estimating the Areal Extent of Hydromorphic Soils , 1997 .

[14]  L. Wilding,et al.  Variation of Soil Morphological Properties Within Miami, Celina, and Crosby Mapping Units in West-Central Ohio 1 , 1965 .

[15]  G. G. Pohlman.  Soil Science Society of America , 1940 .

[16]  P. A. Burrough,et al.  Multiscale sources of spatial variation in soil. II. A non‐Brownian fractal model and its application in soil survey , 1983 .

[17]  D. Mulla,et al.  Soil sampling and interpolation techniques for mapping spatial variability of soil properties. , 1997 .

[18]  J. Bouma,et al.  Land evaluation at different scales: you pay for what you get! , 1987 .

[19]  William U. Reybold,et al.  Soil geographic data bases , 1989 .

[20]  L. Wilding,et al.  Spatial variability: its documentation, accommodation and implication to soil surveys , 1985 .

[21]  M. G. Jarvis,et al.  VARIABILITY IN THREE AREAS OF THE DENCHWORTH SOIL MAP UNIT , 1976 .

[22]  A. G. Hornsby,et al.  Accounting for variability within map units when linking a pesticide fate model to soil survey , 1993 .

[23]  Margaret A. Oliver,et al.  Combining Nested and Linear Sampling for Determining the Scale and Form of Spatial Variation of Regionalized Variables , 2010 .

[24]  S. Nortcliff,et al.  SOIL VARIABILITY AND RECONNAISSANCE SOIL MAPPING. A STATISTICAL STUDY IN NORFOLK , 1978 .

[25]  I. Ohlsson.  Book reviewSite-specific management for agricultural systems: P.C. Robert, R.H. Rust and W.E. Larson (Editors). American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 1995. ISBN 0-89118-127-X, Paperback, 993 pp., US$ 39 , 1996 .

[26]  A. Stein,et al.  Spatial variability of soil actual and potential acidity in the mangrove agroecosystem of West Africa , 1996 .

[27]  J. Dijkerman,et al.  Pedology as a science: The role of data, models and theories in the study of natural soil systems , 1974 .

[28]  Gary A. Peterson,et al.  Soil Attribute Prediction Using Terrain Analysis , 1993 .

[29]  K. Juracek,et al.  Spatial and statistical differences between 1:250,000- and 1:24,000-scale digital soil databases , 2002 .

[30]  Richard Webster,et al.  Soil classification and survey studies at Ginninderra , 1976 .

[31]  D. R. Upchurch,et al.  Statistical Procedures for Specific Objectives , 2015 .

[32]  M. Mausbach,et al.  Spatial variabilities of soils and landforms , 1991 .

[33]  T. Fenton.  Quantitative Modeling of Soil-Forming Processes , 1995 .

[34]  L. Gaston,et al.  Spatial Variability of Morphological Properties at a Florida Flatwoods Site , 1990 .

[35]  L. Wilding,et al.  Variation of Soil Properties within Mapping Units of Soils with Contrasting Substrata in Northwestern Ohio1 , 1969 .

[36]  J. Bouma,et al.  Use of Soil Survey Data for Regional Soil Water Simulation Models1 , 1985 .

[37]  M. H. Stolt,et al.  Soil-Landscape Relationships in Virginia: I. Soil Variability and Parent Material Uniformity , 1993 .

[38]  R. Webster,et al.  Statistical Methods in Soil and Land Resource Survey. , 1990 .

[39]  W. Youden,et al.  Selection of Efficient Methods for Soil Sampling1 , 1938 .

[40]  Hans Th. Riezebos.  Application of nested analysis of variance in mapping procedures for land evaluation , 1989 .

[41]  D. J. Brus,et al.  Random sampling or geostatistical modelling? Choosing between design-based and model-based sampling strategies for soil (with discussion) , 1997 .

[42]  D. Anderson,et al.  A landscape-scale study of soil quality in three prairie farming systems , 1997 .