Robotic etiquette: Results from user studies involving a fetch and carry task

This paper presents results, outcomes and conclusions from a series of Human Robot Interaction (HRI) trials which investigated how a robot should approach a human in a fetch and carry task. Two pilot trials were carried out, aiding the development of a main HRI trial with four different approach contexts under controlled experimental conditions. The findings from the pilot trials were confirmed and expanded upon. Most subjects disliked a frontal approach when seated. In general, seated humans do not like to be approached by a robot directly from the front even when seated behind a table. A frontal approach is more acceptable when a human is standing in an open area. Most subjects preferred to be approached from either the left or right side, with a small overall preference for a right approach by the robot. However, this is not a strong preference and it may be disregarded if it is more physically convenient to approach from a left front direction. Handedness and occupation were not related to these preferences. Subjects do not usually like the robot to move or approach from directly behind them, preferring the robot to be in view even if this means the robot taking a physically non-optimum path. The subjects for the main HRI trials had no previous experience of interacting with robots. Future research aims are outlined and include the necessity of carrying out longitudinal trials to see if these findings hold over a longer period of exposure to robots.

[1]  David Lee,et al.  Exploratory studies on social spaces between humans and a mechanical-looking robot , 2006, Connect. Sci..

[2]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  A study of a single robot interacting with groups of children in a rotation game scenario , 2005, 2005 International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Hardware companions?: what online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship , 2003, CHI '03.

[4]  E. Hall The hidden dimension: an anthropologist examines man's use of space in public and private , 1969 .

[5]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Methodological Issues in HRI: A Comparison of Live and Video-Based Methods in Robot to Human Approach Direction Trials , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[6]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  What is a robot companion - friend, assistant or butler? , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[7]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  Realizing Audio-Visually Triggered ELIZA-Like Non-verbal Behaviors , 2002, PRICAI.

[8]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Empirical results from using a comfort level device in human-robot interaction studies , 2006, HRI '06.

[10]  Rachid Alami,et al.  How may I serve you?: a robot companion approaching a seated person in a helping context , 2006, HRI '06.

[11]  David Lee,et al.  The influence of subjects' personality traits on personal spatial zones in a human-robot interaction experiment , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[12]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Designing sociable robots , 2002 .

[13]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Design spaces and niche spaces of believable social robots , 2002, Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[14]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[15]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  'Doing the right thing wrong' - Personality and tolerance to uncomfortable robot approaches , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[16]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[17]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  How might people interact with agents , 1994, CACM.

[18]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Humanoids and personal robots: Design and experiments , 2001, J. Field Robotics.

[19]  Anders Green,et al.  Social and collaborative aspects of interaction with a service robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[20]  D. Christopher Dryer,et al.  Getting Personal with Computers: How to Design Personalities for Agents , 1999, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[21]  David Lee,et al.  Close encounters: spatial distances between people and a robot of mechanistic appearance , 2005, 5th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2005..

[22]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Is someone watching me? - consideration of social facilitation effects in human-robot interaction experiments , 2005, 2005 International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation.

[23]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Whose Job Is It Anyway? A Study of Human-Robot Interaction in a Collaborative Task , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[24]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  Comparing human robot interaction scenarios using live and video based methods: towards a novel methodological approach , 2006, 9th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, 2006..

[25]  Reid G. Simmons,et al.  Socially distributed perception , 2006, HRI '06.