Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] N Segnan,et al. Inter-observer and intra-observer variability of mammogram interpretation: a field study. , 1992, European journal of cancer.
[2] B. Monsees,et al. The Mammography Quality Standards Act. An overview of the regulations and guidance. , 2000, Radiologic clinics of North America.
[3] K. Kerlikowske,et al. Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretation. , 1996, JAMA.
[4] S. Taplin,et al. Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[5] L. Liberman,et al. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.
[6] K. Larsen,et al. Interpreting Parameters in the Logistic Regression Model with Random Effects , 2000, Biometrics.
[7] K. Kerlikowske,et al. Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[8] J. Elmore,et al. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.
[9] E A Sickles,et al. Quality assurance. How to audit your own mammography practice. , 1992, Radiologic clinics of North America.
[10] C L Robertson,et al. A private breast imaging practice: medical audit of 25,788 screening and 1,077 diagnostic examinations. , 1993, Radiology.
[11] C J Baines,et al. The role of the reference radiologist. Estimates of inter-observer agreement and potential delay in cancer detection in the national breast screening study. , 1990, Investigative radiology.
[12] S J Schnitt,et al. Interobserver Reproducibility in the Diagnosis of Ductal Proliferative Breast Lesions Using Standardized Criteria , 1992, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[13] C. Rutter,et al. Assessing mammographers' accuracy. A comparison of clinical and test performance. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[14] S L Zeger,et al. Multivariate Continuation Ratio Models: Connections and Caveats , 2000, Biometrics.
[15] Craig A. Beam,et al. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.
[16] T. Eberlein,et al. Biopsy of occult breast lesions. Analysis of 1261 abnormalities. , 1990, JAMA.
[17] E A Sickles,et al. Initial versus subsequent screening mammography: comparison of findings and their prognostic significance. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[18] G O Barnett,et al. The application of computer-based medical-record systems in ambulatory practice. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.
[19] R. J. Brenner,et al. Mammographic changes after excisional breast biopsy for benign disease. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[20] J. Elmore,et al. A bibliography of publications on observer variability (final installment). , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[21] T. Eberlein,et al. Biopsy of Occult Breast Lesions and Professional Liability-Reply , 1990 .
[22] G.O. Barnett,et al. COSTAR—A computer-based medical information system for ambulatory care , 1979, Proceedings of the IEEE.
[23] Michael P. Jones. Indicator and stratification methods for missing explanatory variables in multiple linear regression , 1996 .
[24] R. Bird,et al. Low-cost screening mammography: report on finances and review of 21,716 consecutive cases. , 1989, Radiology.
[25] P. Rheinstein,et al. The Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992. , 1994, American family physician.
[26] C. Beam,et al. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.
[27] R. Smith,et al. The mammography audit: a primer for the mammography quality standards act (MQSA). , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[28] Jo M. Kendrick,et al. Quality Determinants of Mammography, Clinical Practice Guideline , 1995 .
[29] C J Baines,et al. Menstrual cycle variation in mammographic breast density: so who cares? , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[30] P. Vineis,et al. Inter-Observer Variability in the Interpretation of Mammograms , 1988, Tumori.
[31] P. Diggle. Analysis of Longitudinal Data , 1995 .
[32] E A Sickles,et al. Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[33] A R Feinstein,et al. A bibliography of publications on observer variability. , 1985, Journal of chronic diseases.
[34] A. Gelfand,et al. Predicting the cumulative risk of false-positive mammograms. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[35] J. Elmore,et al. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.
[36] W W Hauck,et al. A consequence of omitted covariates when estimating odds ratios. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[37] Roger W. Jelliffe,et al. COSTAR-A Computer-Based Medical Information System for Ambulatory Care , 1979 .
[38] L. Tabár,et al. Significant reduction in advanced breast cancer. Results of the first seven years of mammography screening in Kopparberg, Sweden. , 1985, Diagnostic imaging in clinical medicine.
[39] F. Houn,et al. The Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992. History and philosophy. , 1995, Radiologic clinics of North America.
[40] W Vach,et al. Biased estimation of the odds ratio in case-control studies due to the use of ad hoc methods of correcting for missing values for confounding variables. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.
[41] Marydale Debor,et al. Quality determinants of mammography , 1993 .