Competitor analysis in construction bidding

Bidding strategies vary from contractor to contractor, each of which will have different degrees of sensitivity towards the factors affecting their bidding decisions. A competitor analysis using a linear mixed model is proposed for use by contractors as part of a more informed approach in identifying key competitors, and as a basis for formulating bidding strategies. The competitiveness between bids is examined according to: (i) project size, (ii) work sector; (iii) work nature; and (iv) number of bidders. The model was tested empirically by application to a bidding dataset obtained from a large Hong Kong contractor. Allowing for different degrees of sensitivity towards the four bidding variables across competing contractors (i.e. with the model parameters that varied across competing contractors), the results indicate that competitiveness in bidding of this contractor is generally greater than the majority of its competitors.

[1]  Aminah Robinson Fayek,et al.  A survey of the bidding practices of Canadian civil engineering construction contractors , 1999 .

[2]  Goran Runeson,et al.  An analysis of the accuracy of estimating and the distribution of tenders , 1988 .

[3]  Martin Skitmore,et al.  The effect of contract type and size on competitiveness in bidding , 1997 .

[4]  A Merna,et al.  BID EVALUATION FOR UK PUBLIC SECTOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS. , 1990 .

[5]  M. Skitmore.  The construction contract bidder homogeneity assumption: An empirical test , 1991 .

[6]  Dipak C. Jain,et al.  A Random-Coefficients Logit Brand-Choice Model Applied to Panel Data , 1994 .

[7]  Cheng Hsiao,et al.  Analysis of Panel Data , 1987 .

[8]  R. M. Skitmore,et al.  Prequalification and c-competitiveness , 1993 .

[9]  Martin Skitmore,et al.  Changes in profit as market conditions change: An historical study of a building firm , 1996 .

[10]  Robert I. Carr,et al.  Bidding Strategy Using Multiple Regression , 1978 .

[11]  Martin Skitmore,et al.  Identifying non-competitive bids in construction contract auctions , 2002 .

[12]  Richard de Neufville,et al.  Bidding Models: Effects of Bidders' Risk Aversion , 1977 .

[13]  Derek S. Drew,et al.  Applying a random coefficients logistic model to contractors' decision to bid , 2007 .

[14]  Lee Kiang Quah.  Comparative variability in tender bids for refurbishment and new build work , 1992 .

[15]  J. Ware,et al.  Applied Longitudinal Analysis , 2004 .

[16]  J. Ware,et al.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data. , 1982, Biometrics.

[17]  R. Fellows,et al.  An examination of the importance of resource considerations when contractors make project selection decisions , 1992 .

[18]  Derek S. Drew,et al.  Heterogeneous Approach to Modeling Contractors' Decision-to-Bid Strategies , 2008 .

[19]  A. Shash.  Factors considered in tendering decisions by top UK contractors , 1993 .

[20]  Derek S. Drew,et al.  The effect of experience on contractors' competitiveness in recurrent bidding , 2002 .

[21]  Ana Ivelisse Avilés,et al.  Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data , 2001, Technometrics.

[22]  C. M. Tam,et al.  Construction firms at the crossroads in Hong Kong: Going insolvency or seeking opportunity , 2005 .

[23]  Martin Skitmore,et al.  The effect of client and type and size of construction work on a contractor's bidding strategy , 2001 .

[24]  Irtishad Ahmad,et al.  Questionnaire Survey on Bidding in Construction , 1988 .

[25]  Alberto Fernández,et al.  Causes of Subcontracting: Evidence from Panel Data on Construction Firms , 2000 .

[26]  Derek S. Drew,et al.  Modeling the Heterogeneity in Contractors’ Mark-Up Behavior , 2010 .