A post-contingency power flow emulator for generalized probabilistic risks assessment of power grids

Risk-based power dispatch has been proposed as a viable alternative to Security-Constrained Dispatch to reduce power grid costs and help to better understand of prominent hazards. In contrast to classical approaches, risk-based frameworks assign different weights to different contingencies, quantifying both their likelihood occurrence and severity. This leads to an economically profitable operational schedule by exploiting the trade-off between grid risks and costs. However, relevant sources of uncertainty are often neglected due to issues related to the computational cost of the analysis. In this work, we present an efficient risk assessment frameworks for power grids. The approach is based on the Line-Outage Distribution Factors for the severity assessment of post-contingency scenarios. The proposed emulator is embedded within a generalized uncertainty quantification framework to quantify: (1) The effect of imprecision on the estimation of the risk index; (2) The effect of inherent variability, aleatory uncertainty, in environmental-operational variables. The computational cost and accuracy of the proposed risk model are discussed in comparison to traditional approaches. The applicability of the proposed framework to real size grids is exemplified by several case studies.

[1]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Risk assessment and risk-cost optimization of distributed power generation systems considering extreme weather conditions , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  M. Beer,et al.  The Bhattacharyya distance: Enriching the P-box in stochastic sensitivity analysis , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[3]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[4]  Zhao Yang Dong,et al.  A flexible framework of line power flow estimation for high-order contingency analysis , 2015 .

[5]  J.D. McCalley,et al.  Power System Risk Assessment and Control in a Multiobjective Framework , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  L. Bertling,et al.  Probabilistic security assessment for power system operations , 2004, IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004..

[7]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis in the context of imprecise probabilities (p-boxes) using sparse polynomial chaos expansions , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  Hao Zhang,et al.  Interval importance sampling method for finite element-based structural reliability assessment under parameter uncertainties , 2012 .

[9]  Sébastien Destercke,et al.  Computing expectations with continuous p-boxes: Univariate case , 2009, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[10]  V. Kreinovich,et al.  Imprecise probabilities in engineering analyses , 2013 .

[11]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Direct Calculation of Line Outage Distribution Factors , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  James D. McCalley,et al.  Online risk-based security assessment , 2002 .

[13]  Marco de Angelis,et al.  Uncertainty Management in Multidisciplinary Design of Critical Safety Systems , 2015, J. Aerosp. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Tazid Ali,et al.  Modeling Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Using Double Monte Carlo Method , 2012 .

[15]  Edoardo Patelli,et al.  Assessment of power grid vulnerabilities accounting for stochastic loads and model imprecision , 2018, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems.

[16]  Scott Ferson,et al.  Sensitivity analysis using probability bounding , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Kendra L. Van Buren,et al.  Robust Decision Making Applied to the NASA Multidisciplinary Uncertainty Quantification Challenge Problem , 2014, J. Aerosp. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Hybrid Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of the Model of a Twin-Jet Aircraft , 2015, J. Aerosp. Inf. Syst..

[19]  P. Pruvot,et al.  Cyclic security analysis for security constrained optimal power flow , 1997 .

[20]  R. Belmans,et al.  Usefulness of DC power flow for active power flow analysis , 2005, IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2005.

[21]  B. Sudret,et al.  Structural reliability analysis for p-boxes using multi-level meta-models , 2017, 1705.03947.

[22]  Marco de Angelis,et al.  OpenCossan: an efficient open tool for dealing with epistemic and aleatory uncertainties , 2014 .

[23]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  Probability Bounds Analysis as a General Approach to Sensitivity Analysis in Decision Making under Uncertainty , 2007 .

[24]  Yakov Ben-Haim,et al.  Uncertainty, probability and information-gaps , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[25]  J.D. McCalley,et al.  Identifying high risk N-k contingencies for online security assessment , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[26]  Jorge E. Hurtado,et al.  Tighter bounds on the probability of failure than those provided by random set theory , 2017 .

[27]  Jim W. Hall,et al.  Uncertainty-based sensitivity indices for imprecise probability distributions , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[28]  Robert C. Williamson,et al.  Probabilistic arithmetic. I. Numerical methods for calculating convolutions and dependency bounds , 1990, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[29]  Deqiang Gan,et al.  Stability-constrained optimal power flow , 2000 .

[30]  Scott Ferson,et al.  Constructing Probability Boxes and Dempster-Shafer Structures , 2003 .

[31]  Yong Jiang,et al.  Computation of Contingency Probabilities for Electric Transmission Decision Problems , 2005, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on, Intelligent Systems Application to Power Systems.

[32]  Christophe Simon,et al.  Hybrid computation of uncertainty in reliability analysis with p-box and evidential networks , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[33]  Jian Li,et al.  AC power flow importance measures considering multi-element failures , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[34]  Edoardo Patelli,et al.  Imprecise probabilistic framework for power grids risk assessment and sensitivity analysis , 2016 .

[35]  Chun-Chang Liu,et al.  Improvements on the line outage distribution factor for power system security analysis , 1993 .

[36]  Edoardo Patelli,et al.  Do we have enough data? Robust reliability via uncertainty quantification , 2018 .

[37]  Michael Oberguggenberger,et al.  Classical and imprecise probability methods for sensitivity analysis in engineering: A case study , 2009, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[38]  Edoardo Patelli,et al.  Effect of load-generation variability on power grid cascading failures , 2018 .

[39]  Jie Niu,et al.  A multiscale finite element model validation method of composite cable-stayed bridge based on Probability Box theory , 2016 .

[40]  Jonathan Sadeghi,et al.  Analytic Probabilistic Safety Analysis under Severe Uncertainty , 2020 .

[41]  Enrico Zio,et al.  A power-flow emulator approach for resilience assessment of repairable power grids subject to weather-induced failures and data deficiency , 2018 .

[42]  Z. Qiu,et al.  The static displacement and the stress analysis of structures with bounded uncertainties using the vertex solution theorem , 2007 .

[43]  Minghai Liu,et al.  Generalized Line Outage Distribution Factors , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[44]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  The IEEE Reliability Test System-1996. A report prepared by the Reliability Test System Task Force of the Application of Probability Methods Subcommittee , 1999 .

[45]  R D Zimmerman,et al.  MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[46]  Seyed Hossein Hosseinian,et al.  Introducing a Novel DC Power Flow Method With Reactive Power Considerations , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[47]  Nima Amjady,et al.  Security constrained optimal power flow considering detailed generator model by a new robust differe , 2011 .