Prediction of clinical outcome and biological characterization of neuroblastoma by expression profiling

Neuroblastoma is a common childhood tumor comprising cases with rapid disease progression as well as spontaneous regression. Although numerous prognostic factors have been identified, risk evaluation in individual patients remains difficult. To define a reliable prognostic predictor and gene signatures characteristic of biological subgroups, we performed mRNA expression profiling of 68 neuroblastomas of all stages. Expression data were analysed using support vector machines (SVM-rbf), prediction analysis of microarrays (PAM), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) algorithms and multiple decision trees. SVM-rbf performed best of all methods, and predicted recurrence of neuroblastoma with an accuracy of 85% (sensitivity 77%, specificity 94%). PAM identified a classifier of 39 genes reliably predicting outcome with an accuracy of 80%. In comparison, conventional risk stratification based on stage, age and MYCN-status only reached a predictive accuracy of 64%. Kaplan–Meier analysis using the PAM classifier indicated a 5-year survival of 20 versus 78% for patients with unfavorably versus favorably predicted neuroblastomas, respectively (P=0.0001). Significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) identified additional genes differentially expressed among subgroups. MYCN-amplification and high expression of NTRK1/TrkA demonstrated a strong association with specific gene expression patterns. Our data suggest that microarray-derived data in addition to traditional clinical factors will be useful for risk assessment and defining biological properties of neuroblastoma.

[1]  Holger Christiansen,et al.  Loss of a FYN-regulated differentiation and growth arrest pathway in advanced stage neuroblastoma. , 2002, Cancer cell.

[2]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[3]  K K Matthay,et al.  Molecular biology of neuroblastoma. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Predictive ability of DNA microarrays for cancer outcomes and correlates: an empirical assessment , 2003, The Lancet.

[5]  R. Hanada,et al.  Spontaneous regression of localized neuroblastoma detected by mass screening. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  J. Shay,et al.  Differential gene expression profiles between neuroblastomas with high telomerase activity and low telomerase activity. , 2003, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[7]  H. Varmus,et al.  Amplification of N-myc in untreated human neuroblastomas correlates with advanced disease stage. , 1984, Science.

[8]  T. Poggio,et al.  Prediction of central nervous system embryonal tumour outcome based on gene expression , 2002, Nature.

[9]  F. Berthold,et al.  Neuroblastoma screening at one year of age. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  R. Eils,et al.  Acute myeloid leukemias with reciprocal rearrangements can be distinguished by specific gene expression profiles , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Diagnosis of multiple cancer types by shrunken centroids of gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Yudong D. He,et al.  A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast Cancer , 2002 .

[13]  F. Speleman,et al.  Gain of chromosome arm 17q and adverse outcome in patients with neuroblastoma. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Rogier Versteeg,et al.  The N-myc and c-myc downstream pathways include the chromosome 17q genes nm23-H1 and nm23-H2 , 2002, Oncogene.

[16]  M. Radmacher,et al.  Pitfalls in the use of DNA microarray data for diagnostic and prognostic classification. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  Alberto Maria Segre,et al.  Programs for Machine Learning , 1994 .

[18]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 3rd Edition , 1999 .

[19]  Wan Ariffin Bin Abdullah,et al.  Med Pediatr Oncol , 1999 .

[20]  K K Matthay,et al.  Treatment of High-Risk Neuroblastoma with Intensive Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation, and 13-cis-Retinoic Acid , 1999 .

[21]  S. Ishii,et al.  Expression profiling using a tumor-specific cDNA microarray predicts the prognosis of intermediate risk neuroblastomas. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[22]  S. Sugano,et al.  Expression profiling and characterization of 4200 genes cloned from primary neuroblastomas: identification of 305 genes differentially expressed between favorable and unfavorable subsets , 2003, Oncogene.

[23]  F. Berthold,et al.  Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging and response to treatment. , 1993, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[24]  M. Kok,et al.  CHD5, a new member of the chromodomain gene family, is preferentially expressed in the nervous system , 2003, Oncogene.

[25]  E. Hiyama,et al.  Expression profiling of favorable and unfavorable neuroblastomas , 2003, Pediatric Surgery International.

[26]  J. Mesirov,et al.  Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. , 1999, Science.