Handling Implication and Universal Quantification Constraints in FLUX
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Michael Thielscher,et al. From Situation Calculus to Fluent Calculus: State Update Axioms as a Solution to the Inferential Frame Problem , 1999, Artif. Intell..
[2] Thom W. Frühwirth,et al. Theory and Practice of Constraint Handling Rules , 1998, J. Log. Program..
[3] Nicholas R. Jennings,et al. Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages: A Survey , 1995, ECAI Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages.
[4] John McCarthy,et al. SOME PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS FROM THE STANDPOINT OF ARTI CIAL INTELLIGENCE , 1987 .
[5] Michael Thielscher,et al. Under Consideration for Publication in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming Flux: a Logic Programming Method for Reasoning Agents , 2003 .
[6] Mark Witkowski,et al. High-Level Robot Control through Logic , 2000, ATAL.
[7] Krzysztof R. Apt,et al. Logic Programming , 1990, Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, Volume B: Formal Models and Sematics.
[8] Pascal Van Hentenryck. Constraint satisfaction in logic programming , 1989, Logic programming.
[9] John McCarthy,et al. Programs with common sense , 1960 .
[10] Richard Fikes,et al. STRIPS: A New Approach to the Application of Theorem Proving to Problem Solving , 1971, IJCAI.
[11] Michael Thielscher. Reasoning about Actions with CHRs and Finite Domain Constraints , 2002, ICLP.
[12] Ray Reiter,et al. On knowledge-based programming with sensing in the situation calculus , 2001, ACM Trans. Comput. Log..
[13] Michael Thielscher. Pushing the Envelope: Programming Reasoning Agents , 2002 .