A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Ahlgren,et al. Late Results of Activator-Treatment: A cephalometric study , 1976, British journal of orthodontics.
[2] J. Trayfoot,et al. Angle class 11 division 1 malocclusions treated by the Andresen method. An analysis of 17 cases. , 1968, British dental journal.
[3] H Pancherz,et al. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. , 1982, American journal of orthodontics.
[4] A. Björk. The use of metallic implants in the study of facial growth in children: method and application. , 1968, American journal of physical anthropology.
[5] R. W. Reey,et al. The passive activator: case selection, treatment response, and corrective mechanics. , 1978, American journal of orthodontics.
[6] G. Korkhaus. Present orthodontic thought in Germany: Experiences with the Norwegian method of functional orthopedics in the treatment of distoclusion☆ , 1960 .
[7] Arne Bjöek. The principle of the Andresen method of orthodontic treatment, a discussion based on cephalometric x-ray analysis of treated cases , 1951 .
[8] C. Meach. A cephalometric comparison of bony profile changes in Class II, division 1 patients treated with extraoral force and functional jaw orthopedics. , 1966, American journal of orthodontics.
[9] P. Freunthaller. Cephalometric observation in Class II, Division I malocclusions treated with the activator. , 1967, The Angle orthodontist.
[10] K. Vargervik,et al. Morphogenetic response to activator treatment. , 1971, American journal of orthodontics.
[11] Birdsall Holly Sr Broadbent,et al. Bolton standards of dentofacial developmental growth , 1975 .
[12] C. Steiner. Cephalometrics for you and me , 1953 .
[13] H. Pancherz. The effect of continuous bite jumping on the dentofacial complex: a follow-up study after Herbst appliance treatment of class II malocclusions. , 1981, European journal of orthodontics.
[14] L. Wieslander,et al. The effect of activator treatment on class II malocclusions. , 1979, American journal of orthodontics.
[15] H. Luder. Effects of activator treatment--evidence for the occurrence of two different types of reaction. , 1981, European journal of orthodontics.
[16] G. Korkhaus. Present orthodontic thought in Germany , 1960 .
[17] H. Pancherz. Treatment of class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation. , 1979, American journal of orthodontics.
[18] A. M. Cohen. A Study of Class II Division 1 Malocclusions Treated by the Andresen Appliance , 1981, British journal of orthodontics.
[19] S. Jakobsson,et al. Cephalometric evaluation of treatment effect on Class II, Division I malocclusions. , 1967, American journal of orthodontics.
[20] W. Downs,et al. The role of cephalometrics in orthodontic case analysis and diagnosis , 1952 .