A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment.

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate cephalometrically the mechanism of anteroposterior occlusal changes in activator treatment. The analysis used made it possible to relate alterations in the occlusion to sagittal skeletal and dental changes in the maxilla and mandible. The sample consisted of thirty Class II, Division 1 malocclusion cases treated successfully with activators during an average time period of 32 months. Before- and after-treatment head films in centric occlusion were analyzed. The occlusal line (OL) and occlusal line perpendicular (OLp) through sella were used for reference. Linear measurements were performed parallel to OL. The following results were found: (1) The improvement in occlusal relationships in the molar and incisor segments was about equally a result of skeletal and dental changes. (2) Overjet correction averaging 5.0 mm was a result of 2.4 mm more mandibular growth than maxillary growth, a 2.5 mm distal movement of the maxillary incisors, and a 0.1 mm mesial movement of the mandibular incisors. (3) Class II molar correction averaging 5.1 mm was a result of 2.4 mm more mandibular growth than maxillary growth, a 0.4 mm distal movement of the maxillary molars, and a 2.3 mm mesial movement of the mandibular molars. (4) When the findings were compared with longitudinal records of persons with normal occlusion (Bolton standards), activator treatment seemed to inhibit maxillary growth, move the maxillary incisors and molars distally, and move the mandibular incisors and molars mesially. Mandibular growth appeared not to be affected by activator treatment.

[1]  J. Ahlgren,et al.  Late Results of Activator-Treatment: A cephalometric study , 1976, British journal of orthodontics.

[2]  J. Trayfoot,et al.  Angle class 11 division 1 malocclusions treated by the Andresen method. An analysis of 17 cases. , 1968, British dental journal.

[3]  H Pancherz,et al.  The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. , 1982, American journal of orthodontics.

[4]  A. Björk The use of metallic implants in the study of facial growth in children: method and application. , 1968, American journal of physical anthropology.

[5]  R. W. Reey,et al.  The passive activator: case selection, treatment response, and corrective mechanics. , 1978, American journal of orthodontics.

[6]  G. Korkhaus Present orthodontic thought in Germany: Experiences with the Norwegian method of functional orthopedics in the treatment of distoclusion☆ , 1960 .

[7]  Arne Bjöek The principle of the Andresen method of orthodontic treatment, a discussion based on cephalometric x-ray analysis of treated cases , 1951 .

[8]  C. Meach A cephalometric comparison of bony profile changes in Class II, division 1 patients treated with extraoral force and functional jaw orthopedics. , 1966, American journal of orthodontics.

[9]  P. Freunthaller Cephalometric observation in Class II, Division I malocclusions treated with the activator. , 1967, The Angle orthodontist.

[10]  K. Vargervik,et al.  Morphogenetic response to activator treatment. , 1971, American journal of orthodontics.

[11]  Birdsall Holly Sr Broadbent,et al.  Bolton standards of dentofacial developmental growth , 1975 .

[12]  C. Steiner Cephalometrics for you and me , 1953 .

[13]  H. Pancherz The effect of continuous bite jumping on the dentofacial complex: a follow-up study after Herbst appliance treatment of class II malocclusions. , 1981, European journal of orthodontics.

[14]  L. Wieslander,et al.  The effect of activator treatment on class II malocclusions. , 1979, American journal of orthodontics.

[15]  H. Luder Effects of activator treatment--evidence for the occurrence of two different types of reaction. , 1981, European journal of orthodontics.

[16]  G. Korkhaus Present orthodontic thought in Germany , 1960 .

[17]  H. Pancherz Treatment of class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation. , 1979, American journal of orthodontics.

[18]  A. M. Cohen A Study of Class II Division 1 Malocclusions Treated by the Andresen Appliance , 1981, British journal of orthodontics.

[19]  S. Jakobsson,et al.  Cephalometric evaluation of treatment effect on Class II, Division I malocclusions. , 1967, American journal of orthodontics.

[20]  W. Downs,et al.  The role of cephalometrics in orthodontic case analysis and diagnosis , 1952 .