T  2* measurement during first‐pass contrast‐enhanced cardiac perfusion imaging

First‐pass contrast‐enhanced (CE) myocardial perfusion imaging will experience T  2* effects at peak concentrations of contrast agent. A reduction in the signal intensity of left ventricular (LV) blood due to T  2* losses may effect estimates of the arterial input function (AIF) used for quantitative perfusion measurement. Imaging artifacts may also result from T  2* losses as well as off‐resonance due to the bolus susceptibility. We hypothesized that T  2* losses would not be significant for measurement of the AIF in full‐dose studies using a short echo time (TE = 0.6 ms). The purpose of this study was to directly measure T  2* in the LV cavity during first‐pass perfusion. For single‐dose Gd‐DTPA (0.1 mmol/kg at 5 ml/s), the LV blood pool T  2* had a mean value of 9 ms (N = 10) at peak enhancement. Distortion of the AIF due to T  2* signal intensity loss will be less than 10% using TE = 0.6 ms. Magn Reson Med, 2006. Published 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  D. Pennell,et al.  Optimization of the arterial input function for myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  Peter Kellman,et al.  Image reconstruction in SNR units: A general method for SNR measurement † , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  P. Kellman,et al.  Quantitative myocardial perfusion analysis with a dual‐bolus contrast‐enhanced first‐pass MRI technique in humans , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  N. Wilke,et al.  Analysis of myocardial perfusion MRI , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  Leon Axel,et al.  B0 and B1‐insensitive uniform T1‐weighting for quantitative, first‐pass myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging , 2005 .

[6]  F H Epstein,et al.  Adaptive sensitivity encoding incorporating temporal filtering (TSENSE) † , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Accurate assessment of the arterial input function during high‐dose myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  N. Rofsky,et al.  Combined T2* and T1 measurements for improved perfusion and permeability studies in high field using dynamic contrast enhancement , 2006, European Radiology.

[9]  R. Balaban,et al.  Absolute myocardial perfusion in canines measured by using dual-bolus first-pass MR imaging. , 2004, Radiology.

[10]  Leon Axel,et al.  B(0) and B(1)-insensitive uniform T(1)-weighting for quantitative, first-pass myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  L. Axel,et al.  Multislice, dual‐imaging sequence for increasing the dynamic range of the contrast‐enhanced blood signal and CNR of myocardial enhancement at 3T , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  R. Wilson,et al.  Magnetic resonance quantification of the myocardial perfusion reserve with a Fermi function model for constrained deconvolution. , 1998, Medical physics.

[13]  E R McVeigh,et al.  In vivo measurement of T*2 and field inhomogeneity maps in the human heart at 1.5 T , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  D. Pennell,et al.  A single breath‐hold multiecho T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance technique for diagnosis of myocardial iron overload , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.