Orthographic depth and the interaction of visual and auditory processing in word recognition

We studied the influence of word frequency and orthographic depth on the interaction of ortho-graphic and phonetic information in word perception. Native speakers of English and Serbo-Croatian were presented with simultaneous printed and spoken verbal stimuli and had to decide whether they were equivalent. Decision reaction time was measured in three experimental conditions: Clear print and clear speech, degraded print and clear speech, and clear print and degraded speech. Within each language, the effects of visual and auditory degradation were measured, relative to the undegraded presentation. Both effects of degradation were much stronger in English than in Serbo-Croatian. Moreover, they were the same for high- and low-frequency words in both languages. These results can be accounted for by a parallel interactive processing model that assumes lateral connections between the orthographic and phonological systems at all of their levels. The structure of these lateral connections is independent of word frequency and is determined by the relationship between spelling and phonology in the language: simple isomorphic connections between graphemes and phonemes in Serbo-Croatian, but more complex, many-to-one, connections in English.

[1]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[4]  M T Turvey,et al.  Lexical decision in a phonologically shallow orthography , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[5]  G. C. Orden,et al.  Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  D. Balota,et al.  The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? ☆ , 1985 .

[7]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[8]  K. T. Spoehr,et al.  The role of orthographic and phonotactic rules in perceiving letter patterns. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Kathryn T. Spoehr,et al.  Phonological encoding in visual word recognition , 1978 .

[10]  L. Katz,et al.  Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: a multilingual comparison. , 1987 .

[11]  M T Turvey,et al.  Rapid naming is affected by association but not by syntax , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Mark S. Seidenberg The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems , 1985, Cognition.

[13]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Orthographic and phonological activation in auditory and visual word recognition , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Thomas H. Killion,et al.  Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. , 1977 .

[15]  Derek Besner,et al.  Reading for Meaning: The Effects of Concurrent Articulation* , 1981 .

[16]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[17]  L. Katz,et al.  Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: a multilingual comparison. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  G. C. Orden A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading , 1987 .

[19]  R. Burchfield Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[20]  Word recognition in Serbo-Croatian is phonologically analytic. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Word recognition in Serbo-Croatian is phonologically analytic. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  L. Katz,et al.  Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.

[24]  Derek Besner,et al.  Basic processes in reading: Two phonological codes. , 1982 .

[25]  P. Denes On the Motor Theory of Speech Perception , 1965 .

[26]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[27]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition , 1984 .

[28]  M. Schroeder Reference Signal for Signal Quality Studies , 1968 .

[29]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[30]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.