Patterning of the mesoderm in Xenopus: dose-dependent and synergistic effects of Brachyury and Pintallavis.

Widespread expression of the DNA-binding protein Brachyury in Xenopus animal caps causes ectopic mesoderm formation. In this paper, we first show that two types of mesoderm are induced by different concentrations of Brachyury. Animal pole explants from embryos injected with low doses of Xbra RNA differentiate into vesicles containing mesothelial smooth muscle and mesenchyme. At higher concentrations somitic muscle is formed. The transition from smooth muscle formation to that of somitic muscle occurs over a two-fold increase in Brachyury concentration. Brachyury is required for differentiation of notochord in mouse and fish embryos, but even the highest concentrations of Brachyury do not induce this tissue in Xenopus animal caps. Co-expression of Brachyury with the secreted glycoprotein noggin does cause notochord formation, but it is difficult to understand the molecular basis of this phenomenon without knowing more about the noggin signal transduction pathway. To overcome this difficulty, we have now tested mesoderm-specific transcription factors for the ability to synergize with Brachyury. We find that co-expression of Pintallavis, but not goosecoid, with Brachyury causes formation of dorsal mesoderm, including notochord. Furthermore, the effect of Pintallavis, like that of Brachyury, is dose-dependent: a two-fold increase in Pintallavis RNA causes a transition from ventral mesoderm formation to that of muscle, and a further two-fold increase induces notochord and neural tissue. These results suggest that Pintallavis cooperates with Brachyury to pattern the mesoderm in Xenopus.

[1]  J. Rossant,et al.  HNF-3β is essential for node and notochord formation in mouse development , 1994, Cell.

[2]  Thomas M. Jessell,et al.  The winged-helix transcription factor HNF-3β is required for notochord development in the mouse embryo , 1994, Cell.

[3]  Douglas A. Melton,et al.  Mesodermal patterning by an inducer gradient depends on secondary cell–cell communication , 1994, Current Biology.

[4]  M. Mercola,et al.  Morphological differences in Xenopus embryonic mesodermal cells are specified as an early response to distinct threshold concentrations of activin. , 1994, Development.

[5]  J. Smith,et al.  Slow emergence of a multithreshold response to activin requires cell-contact-dependent sharpening but not prepattern. , 1994, Development.

[6]  E M De Robertis,et al.  Expression of zebrafish goosecoid and no tail gene products in wild-type and mutant no tail embryos. , 1994, Development.

[7]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  no tail (ntl) is the zebrafish homologue of the mouse T (Brachyury) gene. , 1994, Development.

[8]  C. Niehrs,et al.  Mesodermal patterning by a gradient of the vertebrate homeobox gene goosecoid. , 1994, Science.

[9]  J. Slack.  Inducing factors in Xenopus early embryos , 1994, Current Biology.

[10]  James C. Smith,et al.  Specification of mesodermal pattern in Xenopus laevis by interactions between Brachyury, noggin and Xwnt‐8. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[11]  J C Smith,et al.  Mesoderm‐inducing factors in early vertebrate development. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[12]  P. Gruss,et al.  Altered Pax gene expression in murine notochord mutants: the notochord is required to initiate and maintain ventral identity in the somite , 1993, Mechanisms of Development.

[13]  A. Colman,et al.  Secretion and mesoderm‐inducing activity of the TGF‐beta‐related domain of Xenopus Vg1. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[14]  T. Jessell,et al.  Ectopic neural expression of a floor plate marker in frog embryos injected with the midline transcription factor Pintallavis. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  J. E. Howard,et al.  Analysis of gastrulation: different types of gastrulation movement are induced by different mesoderm-inducing factors in Xenopus laevis , 1993, Mechanisms of Development.

[16]  D. Melton,et al.  Processed Vg1 protein is an axial mesoderm inducer in xenopus , 1993, Cell.

[17]  B. Herrmann,et al.  The Brachyury gene encodes a novel DNA binding protein. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[18]  G. von Dassow,et al.  Induction of the Xenopus organizer: expression and regulation of Xnot, a novel FGF and activin-regulated homeo box gene. , 1993, Genes & development.

[19]  Ken W. Y. Cho,et al.  The homeobox gene goosecoid controls cell migration in Xenopus embryos , 1993, Cell.

[20]  B. Herrmann,et al.  Rescue of the tail defect of Brachyury mice. , 1993, Genes & development.

[21]  J. Smith,et al.  Responses of embryonic xenopus cells to activin and FGF are separated by multiple dose thresholds and correspond to distinct axes of the mesoderm , 1992, Cell.

[22]  William C. Smith,et al.  Expression cloning of noggin, a new dorsalizing factor localized to the Spemann organizer in Xenopus embryos , 1992, Cell.

[23]  M. Levine,et al.  dorsal-twist interactions establish snail expression in the presumptive mesoderm of the Drosophila embryo. , 1992, Genes & development.

[24]  W. Knöchel,et al.  Activin A induced expression of a fork head related gene in posterior chordamesoderm (notochord) of Xenopus laevis embryos , 1992, Mechanisms of Development.

[25]  J. Thiery,et al.  Ventrolateral regionalization of Xenopus laevis mesoderm is characterized by the expression of alpha-smooth muscle actin. , 1992, Development.

[26]  J. Smith,et al.  Ectopic mesoderm formation in Xenopus embryos caused by widespread expression of a Brachyury homologue , 1992, Nature.

[27]  B. Hogan,et al.  DVR-4 (bone morphogenetic protein-4) as a posterior-ventralizing factor in Xenopus mesoderm induction. , 1992, Development.

[28]  J. Smith,et al.  Bone morphogenetic protein 4: a ventralizing factor in early Xenopus development. , 1992, Development.

[29]  M. Jamrich,et al.  A novel, activin-inducible, blastopore lip-specific gene of Xenopus laevis contains a fork head DNA-binding domain. , 1992, Genes & development.

[30]  Carmen R. Domingo,et al.  Pintallavis, a gene expressed in the organizer and midline cells of frog embryos: involvement in the development of the neural axis. , 1992 .

[31]  P. Good,et al.  The LIM domain-containing homeo box gene Xlim-1 is expressed specifically in the organizer region of Xenopus gastrula embryos. , 1992, Genes & development.

[32]  Ken W. Y. Cho,et al.  Molecular nature of Spemann's organizer: the role of the Xenopus homeobox gene goosecoid , 1991, Cell.

[33]  J. Smith,et al.  Expression of a xenopus homolog of Brachyury (T) is an immediate-early response to mesoderm induction , 1991, Cell.

[34]  J. Vaughan,et al.  Activins are expressed early in Xenopus embryogenesis and can induce axial mesoderm and anterior structures , 1990, Cell.

[35]  E. D. De Robertis,et al.  Differential activation of Xenopus homeo box genes by mesoderm-inducing growth factors and retinoic acid. , 1990, Genes & development.

[36]  K. O. Yanagisawa.  Does the T gene determine the anteroposterior axis of a mouse embryo? , 1990, Idengaku zasshi.

[37]  J. Smith,et al.  Graded changes in dose of a Xenopus activin A homologue elicit stepwise transitions in embryonic cell fate , 1990, Nature.

[38]  G. Eichele,et al.  Polarizing activity and retinoid synthesis in the floor plate of the neural tube , 1990, Nature.

[39]  K. V. Nimmen,et al.  Activin-like factor from a Xenopus laevis cell line responsible for mesoderm induction , 1990, Nature.

[40]  K. Van Nimmen,et al.  Identification of a potent Xenopus mesoderm-inducing factor as a homologue of activin A , 1990, Nature.

[41]  A. Poustka,et al.  Cloning of the T gene required in mesoderm formation in the mouse , 1990, Nature.

[42]  K. Struhl,et al.  The gradient morphogen bicoid is a concentration-dependent transcriptional activator , 1989, Cell.

[43]  Wolfgang Driever,et al.  The bicoid protein is a positive regulator of hunchback transcription in the early Drosophila embryo , 1989, Nature.

[44]  H. Shin,et al.  The antimorphic nature of the Tc allele at the mouse T locus. , 1988, Genetics.

[45]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Synergistic induction of mesoderm by FGF and TGF-β and the identification of an mRNA coding for FGF in the early xenopus embryo , 1987, Cell.

[46]  James C. Smith,et al.  Gastrulation movements provide an early marker of mesoderm induction in Xenopus laevis , 1987 .

[47]  J. Slack,et al.  Mesoderm induction in early Xenopus embryos by heparin-binding growth factors , 1987, Nature.

[48]  J. Gurdon,et al.  Cell type-specific activation of actin genes in the early amphibian embryo , 1984, Nature.

[49]  D. Melton,et al.  Functional messenger RNAs are produced by SP6 in vitro transcription of cloned cDNAs. , 1984, Nucleic acids research.

[50]  J. Slack.  Regional biosynthetic markers in the early amphibian embryo. , 1984, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[51]  J. Brockes,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies identify blastemal cells derived from dedifferentiating muscle in newt limb regeneration , 1984, Nature.

[52]  J C Smith,et al.  Dorsalization and neural induction: properties of the organizer in Xenopus laevis. , 1983, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[53]  P. Chesley.  Development of the short‐tailed mutant in the house mouse , 1935 .

[54]  B. Herrmann,et al.  Immunohistochemical analysis of the Brachyury protein in wild-type and mutant mouse embryos. , 1994, Developmental biology.

[55]  I. Dawid,et al.  Differential induction of regulatory genes during mesoderm formation in Xenopus laevis embryos. , 1993, Developmental genetics.

[56]  R. Harland.  In situ hybridization: an improved whole-mount method for Xenopus embryos. , 1991, Methods in cell biology.

[57]  J. Cooke,et al.  The biological effects of XTC-MIF: quantitative comparison with Xenopus bFGF. , 1990, Development.