Scientific research in the Indian subcontinent: selected trends and indicators 1973–2007 comparing Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka with India, the local giant

As part of a research program to analyse research in Bangladesh we provide a comparison between research indicators related to India, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. In this investigation we make use of Web of Science (WoS) data as well as Scopus data (using the SCImago website). Special attention is given to collaboration data and to the evolution of country h-indices. A comparison based on relative quality indicators shows that Sri Lanka is the best performer among these four countries. Such a result agrees with the ranking of these countries according to the United Nations’ Human Development Index (HDI).

[1]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[2]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Definitions of time series in citation analysis with special attention to the h-index , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[3]  R. H. W. Johnston Science in India , 1984, Nature.

[4]  R. Sadana,et al.  Importance of health research in South Asia , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  The unification of addresses in scientific publications , 1990 .

[6]  Bertrand Meyer The unspoken revolution in software engineering , 2006, Computer.

[7]  D. King The scientific impact of nations , 2004, Nature.

[8]  A. Kinney National scientific facilities and their science impact on nonbiomedical research , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Science in India. A bibliometric study of national and institutional research performance in 1991-2006 , 2008 .

[10]  Nan Ma,et al.  A comparative study of research performance in computer science , 2004, Scientometrics.

[11]  Xia Gao,et al.  A scale-independent analysis of the performance of the Chinese innovation system , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[12]  Jean-François Molinari,et al.  A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions , 2008, Scientometrics.

[13]  Peder Olesen Larsen,et al.  Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies , 2005, Scientometrics.

[14]  Grupo Scimago Asia vista con el SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) , 2008 .