Does Diversity Affect Group Efficacy?

This study examined the relation between racioethnic diversity and group efficacy (assessed as group outcome efficacy and group potency). Social cohesion was hypothesized to moderate this relationship. The authors also predicted that the interactive effect of racioethnic diversity and social cohesion on group efficacy would be mediated by task interdependence. The sample consisted of 42 student project groups. Data were gathered at the completion of the groups’ projects. The results indicate support for the hypotheses that racioethnic diversity is positively related to group efficacy and that the effect of racioethnic diversity on group outcome efficacy is enhanced by social cohesion. There was also some support for the mediating role of task interdependence.

[1]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[2]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[3]  J. Hackman,et al.  Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration , 1975 .

[4]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[5]  C. Gibson.  Do they do what they Believe they can? Group Efficacy and Group Effectiveness Across Tasks and Cultures , 1999 .

[6]  R. Wageman.  Interdependence and Group Effectiveness , 1995 .

[7]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. , 1991 .

[8]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The effects of departmental demography on turnover: The case of a university. , 1983 .

[9]  Warren E. Watson,et al.  Cultural diversity''s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diver , 1993 .

[10]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Psychomotor abilities via touch‐panel testing: Measurement innovations, construct, and criterion validity , 1999 .

[11]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[12]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and Malleability , 1992 .

[13]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Understanding groups in organizations. , 1987 .

[14]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[15]  C. Gersick.  MARKING TIME: PREDICTABLE TRANSITIONS IN TASK GROUPS , 1989 .

[16]  Paul R. Yost,et al.  Potency in groups: articulating a construct. , 1993, The British journal of social psychology.

[17]  G. Johns,et al.  Interactive effects of absence culture salience and group cohesiveness: A multi‐level and cross‐level analysis of work absenteeism in the Chinese context , 2000 .

[18]  Claus W. Langfred.  Is Group Cohesiveness a Double-Edged Sword? , 1998 .

[19]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  L. H. Pelled.  Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory , 1996 .

[21]  R. Saavedra,et al.  Complex interdependence in task-performing groups , 1993 .

[22]  B. Lawrence.  The Black Box of Organizational Demography , 1997 .

[23]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  Allan Bird,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL DEMOGRAPHY IN JAPANESE FIRMS: GROUP HETEROGENEITY, INDIVIDUAL DISSIMILARITY, AND TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM TURNOVER , 1993 .

[25]  Gregory E. Prussia,et al.  A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. , 1996 .

[26]  C. M. Riordan,et al.  Demographic diversity and employee attitudes : An empirical examination of relational demography within work units , 1997 .

[27]  Terry C. Blum,et al.  Employee satisfaction in work groups with different gender composition , 1997 .

[28]  S. Jackson.  Diversity in the Workplace: Human Resources Initiatives , 1992 .

[29]  Barbara S. Lawrence,et al.  Perspective---The Black Box of Organizational Demography , 1997 .

[30]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Creating high performance organizations : practices and results of employee involvement and Total Quality Management in Fortune 1000 companies , 1995 .

[31]  Charles C. Snow,et al.  Characteristics of Managerial Careers in the 21st century , 1996 .

[32]  S. Carless,et al.  The Measurement of Cohesion in Work Teams , 2000 .

[33]  Michelle A. Marks,et al.  A test of the impact of collective efficacy in routine and novel performance environments , 1999 .

[34]  Philip Bobko,et al.  Self-efficacy beliefs: Comparison of five measures. , 1994 .

[35]  James A. Pharmer,et al.  When Member Homogeneity is Needed in Work Teams , 2000 .

[36]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  EAST MEETS WEST MEETS MIDEAST: FURTHER EXPLORATIONS OF COLLECTIVISTIC AND INDIVIDUALISTIC WORK GROUPS. , 1991 .

[37]  L. Festinger.  Informal social communication. , 1950, Psychological review.

[38]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Generalizing From Laboratory to Field Settings. , 1987 .

[39]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Team Structure and Performance: Assessing the Mediating Role of Intrateam Process and the Moderating Role of Task Type , 2000 .

[40]  C. Gersick,et al.  Habitual routines in task-performing groups. , 1990, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[41]  Poppy Lauretta McLeod,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF ETHNIC DIVERSITY ON IDEA GENERATION IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1992 .

[42]  Lawrence R. James,et al.  Personality, affect, and behavior in groups revisited: Comment on aggregation, levels of analysis, and a recent application of within and between analysis. , 1993 .

[43]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. , 1998 .

[44]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[45]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[46]  S. Stewman.  Organizational demography. , 1988, Annual review of sociology.

[47]  Nathan Bennett,et al.  Does Work Group Cohesiveness Affect Individuals' Performance and Organizational Commitment? , 1998 .

[48]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[49]  A. Carrón,et al.  The Development of an Instrument to Assess Cohesion in Sport Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire , 1985 .

[50]  K. Klein,et al.  Levels Issues in Theory Development, Data Collection, and Analysis , 1994 .

[51]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[52]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. , 1989 .

[53]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[54]  Christine M. Riordan.  ADVANCING RELATIONAL DEMOGRAPHY THEORY: A CONSTRUCT VALIDITY STUDY OF THREE MEASURES OF DEMOGRAPHIC SIMILARITY. , 1997 .

[55]  A. Tsui,et al.  Beyond Simple Demographic Effects: The Importance of Relational Demography in Superior-Subordinate Dyads , 1989 .

[56]  A V Carron,et al.  The measurement of cohesion in sports teams: the Group Environment Questionnaire. , 1989, Canadian journal of sport sciences = Journal canadien des sciences du sport.

[57]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The Effects of Departmental Demography on Turnover. , 1982 .

[58]  S. Jackson,et al.  Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. , 1991 .

[59]  Kevin S. Spink,et al.  Group cohesion and collective efficacy of volleyball teams. , 1990 .

[60]  J. McGrath.  Social Psychology: A Brief Introduction , 1964 .

[61]  H. N. Fullerton.  Labor force 2006: slowing down and changing composition. , 1997 .

[62]  Freda Kemp.  Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 2003 .

[63]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .