Effects of Stimulation Rate on Speech Recognition with Cochlear Implants
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M F Dorman,et al. The Identification of Consonants and Vowels by Cochlear Implant Patients Using a 6‐Channel Continuous Interleaved Sampling Processor and by Normal‐Hearing Subjects Using Simulations of Processors with Two to Nine Channels , 1998, Ear and hearing.
[2] W. Dobelle,et al. Auditory Prostheses Research with Multiple Channel Intracochlear Stimulation in Man , 1978, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.
[3] J. Hillenbrand,et al. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] P J Blamey,et al. Psychophysical studies for two multiple-channel cochlear implant patients. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] M. Dorman,et al. Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] M. Dorman,et al. The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] R. Plomp. The Role of Modulation in Hearing , 1983 .
[8] G. Clark,et al. Psychophysical studies evaluating the feasibility of a speech processing strategy for a multiple-channel cochlear implant. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] M F Dorman,et al. Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for normal-hearing listeners and patients with cochlear implants. , 1997, The American journal of otology.
[10] N. Viemeister. Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] J. T Rubinstein,et al. Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation , 1999, Hearing Research.
[12] E. Rouiller,et al. Effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in an animal model of cochlear implants. , 1997, The American journal of otology.
[13] F B Simmons,et al. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. , 1966, Archives of otolaryngology.
[14] G. A. Miller,et al. Erratum: An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 27, 339 (1955)] , 1955 .
[15] E. Evans,et al. Enhancement of vowel coding for cochlear implants by addition of noise , 1996, Nature Medicine.
[16] Q J Fu,et al. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] W Baumgartner,et al. Optimization of channel number and stimulation rate for the fast continuous interleaved sampling strategy in the COMBI 40+. , 1997, The American journal of otology.
[18] S. Rosen. Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[19] D T Lawson,et al. Temporal representations with cochlear implants. , 1997, The American journal of otology.
[20] Bertrand Delgutte,et al. Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] R V Shannon,et al. Consonant recordings for speech testing. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] R V Shannon,et al. Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[23] G M Clark,et al. An acoustic model of a multiple-channel cochlear implant. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[24] F. J. Hill,et al. Speech recognition as a function of channel capacity in a discrete set of channels. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] R. Shannon. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics , 1983, Hearing Research.
[26] Jan Kiefer,et al. Optimized Speech Understanding with the Continuous Interleaved Sampling Speech Coding Strategy in Patients with Cochlear Implants: Effect of Variations in Stimulation Rate and Number of Channels , 2000, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.
[27] Dirk Van Compernolle,et al. Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[28] Astrid van Wieringen,et al. Temporal pitch mechanisms in acoustic and electric hearing. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[29] M F Dorman,et al. The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6-20 channels. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] Bryan E Pfingst,et al. Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: implications for cochlear prostheses. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] Mark E. Robert,et al. Noise Enhances Modulation Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Listeners: Stochastic Resonance in a Prosthetic Sensory System? , 2001, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
[32] D. Fabry,et al. Detection and recognition of stop consonants by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[33] Margaret W Skinner,et al. Effects of Stimulation Rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE Speech Coding Strategy , 2002, Ear and hearing.
[34] D J Van Tasell,et al. Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[35] K. Plant,et al. Speech Perception as a Function of Electrical Stimulation Rate: Using the Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant System , 2000, Ear and hearing.
[36] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[37] G M Clark,et al. Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[38] R V Shannon,et al. Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.
[39] Bertrand Delgutte,et al. Improved neural representation of vowels in electric stimulation using desynchronizing pulse trains. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[40] R V Shannon,et al. Effects of amplitude nonlinearity on phoneme recognition by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[41] B. Delgutte,et al. Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: modulated and unmodulated pulse trains. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[42] G. A. Miller,et al. An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .
[43] IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measurements , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics.
[44] E. M. Burns,et al. Played-again SAM: Further observations on the pitch of amplitude-modulated noise , 1981 .
[45] F. Zeng,et al. Speech recognition with altered spectral distribution of envelope cues. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[46] Bertrand Delgutte,et al. Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[47] R. Shannon,et al. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[48] B. Wilson,et al. Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses , 2001 .
[49] R. Shannon,et al. Effect of stimulation rate on phoneme recognition by nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.