Low Variance Estimation of Backscatter Quantitative Ultrasound Parameters Using Dynamic Programming

One of the main limitations of ultrasound imaging is that image quality and interpretation depend on the skill of the user and the experience of the clinician. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) methods provide objective, system-independent estimates of tissue properties, such as acoustic attenuation and backscattering properties of tissue, which are valuable as objective tools for both diagnosis and intervention. Accurate and precise estimation of these properties requires correct compensation for intervening tissue attenuation. Prior attempts to estimate intervening-tissue attenuation based on minimizing cost functions that compared backscattered echo data to models have resulted in limited precision and accuracy. To overcome these limitations, in this paper, we incorporate the prior information of piecewise continuity of QUS parameters as a regularization term into our cost function. We further propose to calculate this cost function using dynamic programming (DP), a computationally efficient optimization algorithm that finds the global optimum. Our results on tissue-mimicking phantoms show that DP substantially outperforms a published least squares method in terms of both estimation bias and variance.

[1]  Guy Cloutier,et al.  Simultaneous estimation of attenuation and structure parameters of aggregated red blood cells from backscatter measurements. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Ernest J. Feleppa,et al.  Differentiation of metastatic from benign lymph nodes by spectrum analysis in vitro , 1997, 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.97CH36118).

[3]  Timothy J Hall,et al.  Simultaneous backscatter and attenuation estimation using a least squares method with constraints. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  Goutam Ghoshal,et al.  Comparison of Ultrasound Attenuation and Backscatter Estimates in Layered Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms among Three Clinical Scanners , 2012, Ultrasonic imaging.

[5]  K J Parker,et al.  Scattering and reflection identification in H-scan images , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Katsunori Mizuno,et al.  Determining attenuation properties of interfering fast and slow ultrasonic waves in cancellous bone. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Christopher Zach,et al.  A dynamic programming approach for fast and robust object pose recognition from range images , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[8]  Timothy J. Hall,et al.  Ultrasound Attenuation Measurements Using a Reference Phantom with Sound Speed Mismatch , 2011, Ultrasonic imaging.

[9]  Gregory D. Hager,et al.  Ultrasound Elastography: A Dynamic Programming Approach , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Timothy J Hall,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of In Vivo Breast Masses Using Ultrasound Attenuation and Backscatter , 2013, Ultrasonic imaging.

[11]  Ronen Eldan,et al.  Bandit Smooth Convex Optimization: Improving the Bias-Variance Tradeoff , 2015, NIPS.

[12]  Jean-Gabriel Minonzio,et al.  A review of basic to clinical studies of quantitative ultrasound of cortical bone , 2015 .

[13]  Elie Bienenstock,et al.  Neural Networks and the Bias/Variance Dilemma , 1992, Neural Computation.

[14]  Timothy J. Hall,et al.  Task-Oriented Comparison of Power Spectral Density Estimation Methods for Quantifying Acoustic Attenuation in Diagnostic Ultrasound Using a Reference Phantom Method , 2013, Ultrasonic imaging (Print).

[15]  Tomy Varghese,et al.  Scatterer number density considerations in reference phantom-based attenuation estimation. , 2014, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  David Mitton,et al.  Relationships between cortical bone quality biomarkers: Stiffness, toughness, microstructure, mineralization, cross-links and collagen , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS).

[17]  Timothy A Bigelow,et al.  Estimation of total attenuation and scatterer size from backscattered ultrasound waveforms. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  L. X. Yao,et al.  Backscatter Coefficient Measurements Using a Reference Phantom to Extract Depth-Dependent Instrumentation Factors , 1990, Ultrasonic imaging.

[19]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Temporal Hierarchical Adaptive Texture CRF for Automatic Detection of Gadolinium-Enhancing Multiple Sclerosis Lesions in Brain MRI , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Guy Cloutier,et al.  Ultrasound characterization of red blood cell aggregation with intervening attenuating tissue-mimicking phantoms. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Jonathan Mamou,et al.  Review of Quantitative Ultrasound: Envelope Statistics and Backscatter Coefficient Imaging and Contributions to Diagnostic Ultrasound , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[22]  Timothy J Hall,et al.  Acoustic Properties of Breast Fat , 2015, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[23]  Tian Liu,et al.  Ultrasonic tissue characterization using 2-D spectrum analysis and its application in ocular tumor diagnosis. , 2004, Medical physics.

[24]  E J Feleppa,et al.  Differentiation of breast tumors by ultrasonic tissue characterization , 1993, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[25]  T. Hall,et al.  Characterising the microstructure of random media using ultrasound. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Roberto J. Lavarello,et al.  Attenuation Coefficient Estimation of the Healthy Human Thyroid In Vivo , 2015 .

[27]  Jingfeng Jiang,et al.  6F-3 A Regularized Real-Time Motion Tracking Algorithm Using Dynamic Programming for Ultrasonic Strain Imaging , 2006, 2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[28]  Timothy A Bigelow,et al.  Signal processing strategies that improve performance and understanding of the quantitative ultrasound SPECTRAL FIT algorithm. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  E. Madsen,et al.  Tests of backscatter coefficient measurement using broadband pulses , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[30]  E. Madsen,et al.  Nonlinearity parameter for tissue-mimicking materials. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[31]  Kevin J Parker,et al.  H-scan analysis of thyroid lesions , 2018, Journal of medical imaging.

[32]  E. Feleppa,et al.  Statistical framework for ultrasonic spectral parameter imaging. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[33]  H. Ermert,et al.  An ultrasound research interface for a clinical system , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[34]  Pascal Laugier,et al.  Inverse problems in cancellous bone: estimation of the ultrasonic properties of fast and slow waves using Bayesian probability theory. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  K J Parker,et al.  Interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic attenuation and speed measurements. , 1986, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[36]  Roberto Lavarello,et al.  Regularized Spectral Log Difference Technique for Ultrasonic Attenuation Imaging , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[37]  T. Hall,et al.  Renal Ultrasound Using Parametric Imaging Techniques to Detect Changes in Microstructure and Function , 1993, Investigative radiology.