Mode of death in heart failure: findings from the ATLAS trial

Objective: To investigate markers that predict modes of death in patients with chronic heart failure. Design: Randomised, double blind, three period, comparative, parallel group study (ATLAS, assessment of treatment with lisinopril and survival). Patients: 3164 patients with mild, moderate, or severe chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association functional class II–IV). Interventions: High dose (32.5 or 35 mg) or low dose (2.5 or 5 mg) lisinopril once daily for a median of 46 months. Main outcome measures: All cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, sudden death, and chronic heart failure death related to prognostic factors using competing risks analysis. Mode of death was classified by trialists and by an independent end point committee. Results: Age, male sex, pre-existing ischaemic heart disease, increasing heart rate, creatinine concentration, and certain drugs taken at randomisation were markers of increased risk of all cause mortality and cardiovascular death. There were risk markers for sudden death that were different from the risk markers for death from chronic heart failure. Low systolic blood pressure at baseline, raised creatinine, reduced serum sodium or haemoglobin, and increased heart rate were associated with chronic heart failure death. Use of β blockers or antiarrhythmic agents (mainly amiodarone) was associated with a reduced risk of sudden death, whereas long acting nitrates and previous use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors were markers for increased risk. Conclusions: The use of competing risks analysis on the data from the ATLAS study has identified variables associated with certain modes of death in heart failure patients. This approach to analysing outcomes may make it possible to predict which patients might benefit most from particular therapeutic interventions.

[1]  P. Poole‐Wilson,et al.  Toleration of high doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with chronic heart failure: results from the ATLAS trial. The Assessment of Treatment with Lisinopril and Survival. , 2001, Archives of internal medicine.

[2]  J. Cleland,et al.  Clinical trials update: IMPROVEMENT‐HF, COPERNICUS, MUSTIC, ASPECT‐II, APRICOT and HEART , 2000, European journal of heart failure.

[3]  P. Poole‐Wilson,et al.  Efficacy and safety of high-dose lisinopril in chronic heart failure patients at high cardiovascular risk, including those with diabetes mellitus. Results from the ATLAS trial. , 2000, European heart journal.

[4]  P. Poole‐Wilson,et al.  Acute coronary findings at autopsy in heart failure patients with sudden death: results from the assessment of treatment with lisinopril and survival (ATLAS) trial. , 2000, Circulation.

[5]  D. Hall The aspirin-angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor tradeoff: to halve and halve not. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  Salim Yusuf,et al.  Long-term ACE-inhibitor therapy in patients with heart failure or left-ventricular dysfunction: a systematic overview of data from individual patients , 2000, The Lancet.

[7]  S G Thompson,et al.  Survival of patients with a new diagnosis of heart failure: a population based study , 2000, Heart.

[8]  J. Le Heuzey,et al.  Predictors of medical events in patients enrolled in the cardiac insufficiency bisoprolol study (CIBIS): a study of the interactions between beta-blocker therapy and occurrence of critical events using analysis of competitive risks. , 2000, American heart journal.

[9]  J. Cleland,et al.  Is the prognosis of heart failure improving? , 2000, European journal of heart failure.

[10]  M. Lauer,et al.  Ventilatory and heart rate responses to exercise : better predictors of heart failure mortality than peak oxygen consumption. , 1999, Circulation.

[11]  P A Poole-Wilson,et al.  Comparative effects of low and high doses of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril, on morbidity and mortality in chronic heart failure. ATLAS Study Group. , 1999, Circulation.

[12]  J. Cleland,et al.  The LIDO, HOPE, MOXCON and WASH studies , 1999 .

[13]  Y. Rosenberg,et al.  In-hospital versus out-of-hospital presentation of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias predicts survival: results from the AVID Registry. Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  G. Pontone,et al.  Aspirin worsens exercise performance and pulmonary gas exchange in patients with heart failure who are taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. , 1999, American heart journal.

[15]  U. Goldbourt,et al.  Aspirin and mortality in patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a cohort study of 11,575 patients with coronary artery disease. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  J. Cleland,et al.  Sudden death in heart failure: vascular or electrical? , 1999, European journal of heart failure.

[17]  K. Song,et al.  Interaction of ACE Inhibitors and Aspirin in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure , 1999, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[18]  P. Poole‐Wilson,et al.  Baseline clinical characteristics of patients recruited into the assessment of treatment with lisinopril and survival study , 1999, European journal of heart failure.

[19]  M. Komajda,et al.  Risk stratification in chronic heart failure. , 1998, European heart journal.

[20]  M. Gheorghiade,et al.  Amiodarone therapy in chronic heart failure and myocardial infarction: a review of the mortality trials with special attention to STAT-CHF and the GESICA trials. Grupo de Estudio de la Sobrevida en la Insuficiencia Cardiaca en Argentina. , 1997, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[21]  S. Kayser Clinical trials update. , 1997, Progress in cardiovascular nursing.

[22]  A. Hall,et al.  Effect of ramipril on morbidity and mode of death among survivors of acute myocardial infarction with clinical evidence of heart failure. A report from the AIRE Study Investigators. , 1997, European heart journal.

[23]  A. Hall,et al.  Mode of death in chronic heart failure. A request and proposition for more accurate classification. , 1996, European heart journal.

[24]  David J. Weatherall,et al.  Oxford textbook of medicine , 1996 .

[25]  S. Nitter‐Hauge,et al.  Risk Factors for Early and Late Mortality in Surgical Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease , 1995, Cardiovascular surgery.

[26]  J. Cohn,et al.  Interobserver discordance in the classification of mechanisms of death in studies of heart failure. , 1995, Journal of cardiac failure.

[27]  J P Klein,et al.  Statistical methods for dependent competing risks , 1995, Lifetime data analysis.

[28]  J. Cleland The clinical course of heart failure and its modification by ACE inhibitors: insights from recent clinical trials. , 1994, European heart journal.

[29]  G. Murray,et al.  Effect of ramipril on mortality and morbidity of survivors of acute myocardial infarction with clinical evidence of heart failure. The Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE) Study Investigators , 1993 .

[30]  Therapy Study Investigators Effect of ramipril on mortality and morbidity of survivors of acute myocardial infarction with clinical evidence of heart failure , 1993, The Lancet.

[31]  D. DeMets,et al.  Effect of oral milrinone on mortality in severe chronic heart failure. The PROMISE Study Research Group. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  G. Naccarelli,et al.  A critical appraisal of the cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial (CAST). , 1991, Applied cardiopulmonary pathophysiology : ACP.