Shortcut in DIC error assessment induced by image interpolation used for subpixel shifting

In order to characterize errors of Digital Image Correlation (DIC) algorithms, sets of virtual images are often generated from a reference image by in-plane sub-pixel translations. This leads to the determination of the well-known S-shaped bias error curves and their corresponding random error curves. As images are usually shifted by using interpolation schemes similar to those used in DIC algorithms, the question of the possible bias in the quantification of measurement uncertainties of DIC softwares is raised and constitutes the main problematic of this paper. In this collaborative work, synthetic numerically shifted images are built from two methods: one based on interpolations of the reference image and the other based on the transformation of an analytic texture function. Images are analyzed using an in-house subset-based DIC software and results are compared and discussed. The effect of image noise is also highlighted. The main result is that the a priori choices to numerically shift the reference image modify DIC results and may lead to wrong conclusions in terms of DIC error assessment

[1]  Yong Su,et al.  Experimental analysis of image noise and interpolation bias in digital image correlation , 2016 .

[2]  Bing Pan,et al.  Comparison of subset-based local and FE-based global digital image correlation: Theoretical error analysis and validation , 2016 .

[3]  S. Choi,et al.  Measurement of deformations on concrete subjected to compression using image correlation , 1997 .

[4]  Antonio Baldi,et al.  A posteriori compensation of the systematic error due to polynomial interpolation in digital image correlation , 2013 .

[5]  W. F. Ranson,et al.  Determination of displacements using an improved digital correlation method , 1983, Image Vis. Comput..

[6]  G. Vendroux,et al.  Submicron deformation field measurements: Part 1. Developing a digital scanning tunneling microscope , 1998 .

[7]  Jean-José Orteu,et al.  Assessment of Digital Image Correlation Measurement Accuracy in the Ultimate Error Regime: Main Results of a Collaborative Benchmark , 2013 .

[8]  M. A. Sutton,et al.  Systematic errors in digital image correlation caused by intensity interpolation , 2000 .

[9]  Qingchuan Zhang,et al.  Theoretical estimation of systematic errors in local deformation measurements using digital image correlation , 2017 .

[10]  H. Haddadi,et al.  Use of rigid-body motion for the investigation and estimation of the measurement errors related to digital image correlation technique , 2008 .

[11]  Jarmo T. Alander,et al.  Deformation image generation for testing a strain measurement algorithm , 2008 .

[12]  Maurice Whelan,et al.  Calibration and evaluation of optical systems for full-field strain measurement , 2007 .

[13]  Stéphane Roux,et al.  Stress intensity factor measurements from digital image correlation: post-processing and integrated approaches , 2006 .

[14]  B. Wattrisse,et al.  Analysis of strain localization during tensile tests by digital image correlation , 2001 .

[15]  Dimitri Debruyne,et al.  Assessment of measuring errors in DIC using deformation fields generated by plastic FEA , 2009 .

[16]  M. Sutton,et al.  Effects of subpixel image restoration on digital correlation error estimates , 1988 .

[17]  Yong Su,et al.  Quality assessment of speckle patterns for DIC by consideration of both systematic errors and random errors , 2016 .

[18]  Pascal Doumalin,et al.  Strain Measurement by Digital Image Correlation: Influence of Two Types of Speckle Patterns Made from Rigid or Deformable Marks , 2012 .

[19]  W. F. Ranson,et al.  Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics , 1985 .

[20]  Lei Xiong,et al.  Performance of iterative gradient-based algorithms with different intensity change models in digital image correlation , 2012 .

[21]  M. Grédiac,et al.  Assessment of Digital Image Correlation Measurement Errors: Methodology and Results , 2009 .

[22]  W. Peters,et al.  Digital Imaging Techniques In Experimental Stress Analysis , 1982 .

[23]  Wilfried Philips,et al.  Evaluation of digital image correlation techniques using realistic ground truth speckle images , 2010 .

[24]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Uncertainty quantification in DIC with Kriging regression , 2016 .

[25]  Michael A. Sutton,et al.  Metrology in a scanning electron microscope: theoretical developments and experimental validation , 2006 .

[26]  M. Sutton,et al.  Gaussian Pre-Filtering for Uncertainty Minimization in Digital Image Correlation Using Numerically-Designed Speckle Patterns , 2015 .

[27]  Hugh A. Bruck,et al.  A new method for characterizing nonlinearity in scanning probe microscopes using digital image correlation , 2005 .

[28]  Sven Bossuyt,et al.  Quality assessment of speckle patterns for digital image correlation , 2006 .

[29]  Phillip L. Reu,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Methods for Exact Subpixel Shifting , 2011 .

[30]  Huimin Xie,et al.  Mean intensity gradient: An effective global parameter for quality assessment of the speckle patterns used in digital image correlation , 2010 .

[31]  Peng Zhou,et al.  Subpixel displacement and deformation gradient measurement using digital image/speckle correlation (DISC) , 2001 .