Hybrid fuzzy MADM ranking procedure for better alternative discrimination

In this paper, we propose a hybrid fuzzy decision making approach, combining elements of fuzzy-ELECTRE and Fuzzy-TOPSIS, towards a new ranking procedure. The main objective of FETOPSIS is to offer rankings with good alternative discriminatory power to decision makers (DMs). This research work was motivated by a real case study in which multiple attribute decision making techniques were used to select the best set of investment projects for the industrial restructuring of a small oil company in Brazil. After the application of Fuzzy-TOPSIS and ELECTRE II, the obtained rankings were quite deceptive from the DMs' point of view, either to very close scores or by the excess of indifferences among alternatives. Our developed approach uses the closeness coefficients to rank the alternatives, following Fuzzy-TOPSIS, however they are computed over the normalized fuzzy concordance and discordance indexes based on the ELECTRE family. Extensive computational experiments were performed to evaluate our method. The good results obtained by FETOPSIS in the experiments, both in terms of alternative discriminatory power of rankings, and eliminating ranking reversal cases, gave us the confidence to apply the method in the real case. The DMs praised the developed approach, since the obtained rankings were more discriminatory in the alternatives than both Fuzzy-TOPSIS and ELECTRE II, making it possible to select with confidence a set of suited alternatives. HighlightsA new MADM approach, combining ELECTRE and TOPSIS elements, was introduced.We addressed the gap in the ELECTRE literature about ranking reversals.We performed an in-depth analysis of an ELECTRE based method.The developed approach improved the discrimination of alternatives.Preferred scores by DMs were obtained in a real-world application.

[1]  Babak Daneshvar Rouyendegh,et al.  Selecting the Best Project Using the Fuzzy ELECTRE Method , 2012 .

[2]  Caroline M. Eastman,et al.  Review: Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic: Theory and applications : Arnold Kaufmann and Madan M. Gupta, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1985 , 1987, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[3]  David L. Olson,et al.  Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models , 2004, Math. Comput. Model..

[4]  A. Kaufmann,et al.  Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic : theory and applications , 1986 .

[5]  Drakoulis Martakos,et al.  In-depth analysis and simulation study of an innovative fuzzy approach for ranking alternatives in multiple attribute decision making problems based on TOPSIS , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[6]  Kaveh Khalili Damghani,et al.  Application of a fuzzy TOPSIS method base on modified preference ratio and fuzzy distance measurement in assessment of traffic police centers performance , 2010, Appl. Soft Comput..

[7]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[8]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management , 2006 .

[10]  R. K. Singh,et al.  A fuzzy TOPSIS based approach for e-sourcing , 2011, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[11]  John W. Fowler,et al.  A hybrid approach using the analytic hierarchy process and integer programming to screen weapon systems projects , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[12]  Cheng-Wei Lin,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation , 2005 .

[13]  A. Zandi,et al.  Extension of Fuzzy ELECTRE based on VIKOR method , 2013, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[14]  Hsu-Shih Shih,et al.  Incremental analysis for MCDM with an application to group TOPSIS , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple attribute decision making : an introduction , 1995 .

[16]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking and outranking methods , 2010 .

[17]  A. Hatami-Marbini,et al.  An Extension of the Electre I Method for Group Decision-Making Under a Fuzzy Environment , 2011 .

[18]  Jun Guo,et al.  Rank B2C e-commerce websites in e-alliance based on AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  B. Roy The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods , 1991 .

[20]  Serhat Burmaoglu,et al.  A fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach for professional selection , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  J. Siskos A way to deal with fuzzy preferences in multi-criteria decision problems , 1982 .

[22]  Anjali Awasthi,et al.  Application of fuzzy TOPSIS in evaluating sustainable transportation systems , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[23]  Emel Kizilkaya Aydogan,et al.  Performance measurement model for Turkish aviation firms using the rough-AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[24]  W. Cook,et al.  A multiple criteria decision model with ordinal preference data , 1991 .

[25]  Chia-Chi Sun,et al.  A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Stelios H. Zanakis,et al.  Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  An integrated fuzzy AHP-ELECTRE methodology for environmental impact assessment , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[28]  E. Triantaphyllou,et al.  Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods , 2008 .

[29]  Dae-Ho Byun,et al.  The AHP approach for selecting an automobile purchase model , 2001, Inf. Manag..