The effects of indicating rear-end collision risk via variable message signs on traffic behaviour

Abstract Research on the effects of safety messages on driving behaviour remains relatively scant. The present study aims to manipulate drivers’ risk perception by displaying messages containing risk level information, and measure the behavioural implications. Using proximal safety indicators (i.e. rear-end collision risk index), the risk level in each 5 min time interval was determined by traffic conditions in the previous 5 min interval based on a linguistic scale of “low”, “medium” and “high” risk. The risk level was displayed on Variable Message Signs (VMS) and changes in risk perception indicators (i.e. speed, time to collision and safety margin) were compared with null messages, while keeping other conditions similar in terms of driving lane and time (day/night). The experimental data set including about 43,000 vehicles was obtained by inductive loop detectors at one freeway site over two days. The control sample, where null messages were displayed, included about 40,000 vehicles and was also obtained at the same location using the same method on two different days. Results suggest that the same message may evoke opposite effects in different situations. Risky behavioural adaptations were observed under low and medium risk messages during night time. The effects of high risk messages, however, were consistently related to safe adaptations. The effects of messaging on rear-end conflicts were significant only in the fast lane at night time. The results could be used in regulating the activation algorithm for safety messages in real time VMS.

[1]  Juha Luoma,et al.  Effects of variable message signs for slippery road conditions on reported driver behaviour , 2000 .

[2]  G J Wilde,et al.  Risk homeostasis theory: an overview , 1998, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[3]  Nick Hounsell,et al.  Driver response to variable message sign information in London , 2002 .

[4]  Amir Reza Mamdoohi,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Safety Performance Indicators Based on Inductive Loop Detector Data , 2014 .

[5]  L. Robertson,et al.  For and against , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Impact of traveler advisory systems on driving speed: some new evidence , 2004 .

[7]  Tom Heijer,et al.  Proposed safety criteria for traffic control on motorways , 1997 .

[8]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Questionnaire surveys to evaluate user response to variable message signs in an urban network , 2007 .

[9]  René van Paassen,et al.  Design of a Haptic Gas Pedal for Active Car-Following Support , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[10]  Jorge Ramos,et al.  Content of Variable Message Signs and On-Line Driver Behavior , 2000 .

[11]  Kim S. Sankey,et al.  Relationships between young drivers' personality characteristics, risk perceptions, and driving behaviour. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Seri Park,et al.  A method for identifying rear-end collision risks using inductive loop detectors. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  S. Emerson,et al.  AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). 2001. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Fourth Edition. Washington, D.C. , 2007 .

[14]  Nedal T. Ratrout,et al.  Effectiveness of Newly Introduced Variable Message Signs in Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia , 2014 .

[15]  Gerald J.S. Wilde,et al.  The Theory of Risk Homeostasis: Implications for Safety and Health , 1982 .

[16]  Rhonda Young,et al.  Impact of Dynamic Message Signs on Speeds Observed on a Rural Interstate , 2014 .

[17]  Risto Kulmala,et al.  Effects of variable message signs for slippery road conditions on driving speed and headways , 2000 .

[18]  Markus Popkema,et al.  Modifying behavior by smart design , 2006 .

[19]  Rvd Horst,et al.  TIME-TO-COLLISION AS A CUE FOR DECISION-MAKING IN BRAKING , 1991 .

[20]  Lijun Sun,et al.  Empirical Analysis and Modeling of Drivers’ Response to Variable Message Signs in Shanghai, China , 2011 .

[21]  Fridulv Sagberg,et al.  Effects of route guidance variable message signs (VMS) on driver behaviour , 2007 .

[22]  Peter Bonsall,et al.  Driver response to variable message signs: a stated preference investigation , 1997 .

[23]  T Assum,et al.  Risk compensation--the case of road lighting. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Yunpeng Wang,et al.  A Car-Following Model Based on Quantified Homeostatic Risk Perception , 2013 .

[25]  Guangquan Lu,et al.  Quantitative indicator of homeostatic risk perception in car following , 2012 .

[26]  Ali S Al-Ghamdi,et al.  Experimental evaluation of fog warning system. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  Baher Abdulhai,et al.  Impacts on Traffic Diversion Rates of Changed Message on Changeable Message Sign , 2008 .

[28]  Rune Elvik,et al.  The Handbook of Road Safety Measures , 2009 .

[29]  Xuedong Yan,et al.  Effectiveness of variable message signs on driving behavior based on a driving simulation experiment , 2014 .

[30]  Richard Tay,et al.  Effectiveness of Road Safety Messages on Variable Message Signs , 2010 .

[31]  Torbjørn Rundmo,et al.  Cross-cultural comparisons of traffic safety, risk perception, attitudes and behaviour , 2009 .