Speech identification based on temporal fine structure cues.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Les E. Atlas,et al. Coherent envelope detection for modulation filtering of speech , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..
[2] Brian C J Moore,et al. Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[3] Herman J. M. Steeneken,et al. Phoneme-group specific octave-band weights in predicting speech intelligibility , 2002, Speech Commun..
[4] Michael K. Qin,et al. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] S. Rosen. Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[6] J. L. Flanagan,et al. Parametric coding of speech spectra , 1980 .
[7] A. Oxenham,et al. The relationship between frequency selectivity and pitch discrimination: effects of stimulus level. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] G. A. Miller,et al. An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .
[9] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Contribution of frequency modulation to speech recognition in noise. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] Herman J. M. Steeneken,et al. Mutual dependence of the octave-band weights in predicting speech intelligibility , 1999, Speech Commun..
[11] Stanley Sheft,et al. Envelope Processing and Sound-Source Perception , 2008 .
[12] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Encoding frequency Modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[13] N. Viemeister. Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] Zachary M. Smith,et al. Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception , 2002, Nature.
[15] S. Bacon,et al. Psychophysical measures of auditory nonlinearities as a function of frequency in individuals with normal hearing. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] T. Irino,et al. A time-domain, level-dependent auditory filter: The gammachirp , 1997 .
[17] Frédéric Berthommier,et al. Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise , 2006, Hearing Research.
[18] S Rosen,et al. Auditory filter bandwidths as a function of level at low frequencies (125 Hz-1 kHz) , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] Jong Ho Won,et al. Effects of Temporal Fine Structure on the Lateralization of Speech and on Speech Understanding in Noise , 2007, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
[20] B. Moore,et al. Frequency selectivity as a function of level and frequency measured with uniformly exciting notched noise. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] Hideki Kawahara,et al. YIN, a fundamental frequency estimator for speech and music. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] O Ghitza,et al. On the upper cutoff frequency of the auditory critical-band envelope detectors in the context of speech perception. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] Christian Lorenzi,et al. The ability of listeners to use recovered envelope cues from speech fine structure. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[24] R V Shannon,et al. Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.
[25] J. C. Steinberg,et al. Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds , 1945 .
[26] W. S. Rhode. Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] D D Dirks,et al. Application of the Articulation Index and the Speech Transmission Index to the recognition of speech by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[28] G. Stickney,et al. On the dichotomy in auditory perception between temporal envelope and fine structure cues. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[29] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[30] J. L. Flanagan,et al. PHASE VOCODER , 2008 .
[31] Peggy B Nelson,et al. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] C. Turner,et al. Frequency-weighting functions for broadband speech as estimated by a correlational method. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] Bryan E Pfingst,et al. Relative importance of temporal envelope and fine structure in lexical-tone perception. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[34] Michael Weir,et al. Auditory abilities of experienced signal analysts , 2001 .
[35] Lloyd A. Jeffress. Beating sinusoids and pitch changes. , 1968 .
[36] D. Pisoni,et al. Speech perception without traditional speech cues. , 1981, Science.
[37] A. Papoulis,et al. Random modulation: A review , 1983 .
[38] Brian R Glasberg,et al. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.
[39] Bryan E Pfingst,et al. Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[40] P. Loughlin,et al. On the amplitude‐ and frequency‐modulation decomposition of signals , 1996 .
[41] B. Moore,et al. Quantifying the effects of fast-acting compression on the envelope of speech. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[42] Christian Lorenzi,et al. Effects of periodic interruptions on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine-structure or envelope cues. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[43] R Drullman,et al. Temporal envelope and fine structure cues for speech intelligibility. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[44] P E Rubin,et al. On the perception of speech from time-varying acoustic information: Contributions of amplitude variation , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.
[45] C D Geisler,et al. Auditory nerve fiber response to wide-band noise and tone combinations. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.
[46] Roy D. Patterson,et al. A Dynamic Compressive Gammachirp Auditory Filterbank , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.
[47] Michael K. Qin,et al. Effects of introducing unprocessed low-frequency information on the reception of envelope-vocoder processed speech. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.