Phase I and II pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

The purpose of this phase I and II study was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of bortezomib in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. This was a dose‐escalation study designed to determine the recommended dose for Japanese patients (phase I) and to investigate the antitumor activity and safety (phase II) of bortezomib administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 21 days. Thirty‐four patients were enrolled. A dose‐limiting toxicity was febrile neutropenia, which occurred in one of six patients in the highest‐dose cohort in phase I and led to the selection of 1.3 mg/m2 as the recommended dose. Adverse events ≥ grade 3 were rare except for hematological toxicities, although there was one fatal case of interstitial lung disease. The overall response rate was 30% (95% confidence interval, 16–49%). Pharmacokinetic evaluation showed a biexponential decline, characterized by a rapid distribution followed by a longer elimination, after dose administration, whereas the area under the concentration–time curve increased proportionately with the dose. Bortezomib was effective in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. A favorable tolerability profile was also seen, although the potential for pulmonary toxicity should be monitored closely. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of bortezomib in the present study warrant further investigations, including more relevant administration schedules. (Cancer Sci 2008; 99: 140–144)

[1]  Hartmut Goldschmidt,et al.  Bortezomib or high-dose dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  R. Millikan,et al.  Phase I trial of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors with observations in androgen-independent prostate cancer. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Bart Barlogie,et al.  A phase 2 study of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  G. Morgan,et al.  High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  P. Elliott,et al.  Proteasome inhibition measurements: clinical application. , 2000, Clinical chemistry.

[6]  S. Jagannath,et al.  CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING DISEASE RESPONSE AND PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA TREATED BY HIGH‐DOSE THERAPY AND HAEMOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION , 1998, British journal of haematology.

[7]  Oken Management of Myeloma: Current and Future Approaches. , 1998, Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center.

[8]  J. Rossi,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation and Chemotherapy in Multiple Myeloma , 1996 .

[9]  M. Oken Standard treatment of multiple myeloma. , 1994, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[10]  A. Paccagnella,et al.  Second and third responses to the same induction regimen in relapsing patients with multiple myeloma , 1991, Cancer.

[11]  A. Buzaid,et al.  Management of refractory myeloma: a review. , 1988, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  B. Barlogie,et al.  High-dose glucocorticoid treatment of resistant myeloma. , 1986, Annals of internal medicine.

[13]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Effective treatment of advanced multiple myeloma refractory to alkylating agents. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.