Difference test sensitivity: Cognitive contrast effects
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G. Milliken,et al. PREDICTING INTERSTIMULUS INTERVALS BETWEEN SAMPLES FOR CAPSAICIN‐CONTAINING SALSA WITH A RANGE OF HEAT LEVELS , 2005 .
[2] Z. Vickers,et al. The effectiveness of palate cleansing strategies for evaluating the bitterness of caffeine in cream cheese , 2004 .
[3] D. Ennis,et al. The multiple dual-pair method , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.
[4] Edgar Chambers,et al. Effects of interstimulus rinsing and time on measurements of capsaicin heat in tomato salsa , 1999 .
[5] Jean-Marc Sieffermann,et al. TASTE DISCRIMINATION BY THE 3‐AFC METHOD: TESTING SENSITIVITY PREDICTIONS REGARDING PARTICULAR TASTING SEQUENCES BASED ON THE SEQUENTIAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS MODEL , 1999 .
[6] John M. Ennis,et al. Thurstonian models for variants of the method of tetrads , 1998 .
[7] Michael O'Mahony,et al. SENSORY DIFFERENCE TESTS: THURSTONIAN AND SSA PREDICTIONS FOR VANILLA FLAVORED YOGURTS , 1997 .
[8] M. O'Mahony,et al. BEER BITTERNESS DETECTION: TESTING THURSTONIAN AND SEQUENTIAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS MODELS FOR TRIAD AND TETRAD METHODS , 1995 .
[9] D. Ennis,et al. Triadic discrimination testing: refinement of Thurstonian and sequential sensitivity analysis approaches. , 1994, Chemical senses.
[10] Daniel M. Ennis,et al. THE POWER OF SENSORY DISCRIMINATION METHODS , 1993 .
[11] F. Gregory Ashby,et al. The relative sensitivities of same-different and identification judgment models to perceptual dependence , 1993 .
[12] D. Ennis,et al. Probabilistic psychophysics with noisy stimuli , 1992 .
[13] Kenneth Mullen,et al. A simple multivariate probabilistic model for preferential and triadic choices , 1991 .
[14] K Mullen,et al. Models for the duo-trio and triangular methods. , 1988, Biometrics.
[15] Kenneth Mullen,et al. A multidimensional stochastic theory of similiarity , 1988 .
[16] Kenneth Mullen,et al. Variants of the method of triads: Utridimensional Thurstonian models , 1988 .
[17] Michael O'Mahony,et al. Tasting successive salt and water stimuli: the roles of adaptation, variability in physical signal strength, learning, supra- and subadapting signal detectability , 1987 .
[18] D. Ennis,et al. Theoretical aspects of sensory discrimination , 1986 .
[19] M. O'Mahony,et al. Effectiveness of Sensory Difference Tests: Sequential Sensitivity Analysis for Liquid Food Stimuli , 1986 .
[20] Kenneth Mullen,et al. A multivariate model for discrimination methods , 1986 .
[21] D. Ennis,et al. The effect of dimensionality on results from the triangular method , 1985 .
[22] J. Frijters,et al. Expanded tables for conversion of a proportion of correct responses (P') to the measure of sensory difference (d') for the triangular method and the 3-altern , 1982 .
[23] Roger Ratcliff,et al. A revised table of d’ for M-alternative forced choice , 1979 .
[24] L. Bartoshuk,et al. The psychophysics of taste. , 1978, The American journal of clinical nutrition.
[25] M. O'Mahony,et al. WHAT SENSATION SIGNALS THE SALT TASTE THRESHOLD , 1976 .
[26] L. Bartoshuk. NaCl thresholds in man: thresholds for water taste or NaCl taste? , 1974, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.
[27] C. Pfaffmann,et al. Taste of Sodium Chloride Solutions after Adaptation to Sodium Chloride: Implications for the "Water Taste" , 1964, Science.