Influence of the noise and artefact in automatically analysed long term electrocardiograms on different methods for time-domain measurement of heart rate variability
暂无分享,去创建一个
M. Malik | R. Xia | J. Poloniecki | O. Odemuyiwa | T. Farrell | A. Staunton | A.J. Camm
[1] A J Camm,et al. Significance of long term components of heart rate variability for the further prognosis after acute myocardial infarction. , 1990, Cardiovascular research.
[2] J. Miller,et al. Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.
[3] A J Camm,et al. Prognostic value of reduced heart rate variability after myocardial infarction: clinical evaluation of a new analysis method. , 1991, British heart journal.
[4] A. Camm,et al. Heart rate variability in relation to prognosis after myocardial infarction: selection of optimal processing techniques. , 1989, European heart journal.
[5] D. Ewing,et al. New method for assessing cardiac parasympathetic activity using 24 hour electrocardiograms. , 1984, British heart journal.
[6] M Malik,et al. Circadian rhythm of heart rate variability after acute myocardial infarction and its influence on the prognostic value of heart rate variability. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.
[7] O Odemuyiwa,et al. Comparison of the predictive characteristics of heart rate variability index and left ventricular ejection fraction for all-cause mortality, arrhythmic events and sudden death after acute myocardial infarction. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.
[8] J. Fleiss,et al. Components of heart rate variability measured during healing of acute myocardial infarction. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.