Influence of the noise and artefact in automatically analysed long term electrocardiograms on different methods for time-domain measurement of heart rate variability

The authors evaluated the effects of the misrecognition artefact of automatic electrocardiogram (ECG) recognition on four methods for time-domain heart rate variability measurement which have been previously shown to provide clinically relevant prognostic data in survivors of acute myocardial infarction. Ambulatory long-term ECGs were recorded in 182 survivors of the acute phase of myocardial infarction, and these ECGs were analyzed in two ways: automatically and with visual checks and manual editing of the computerized recognition. Correlation coefficients were calculated for the two sets of results of each method. The precision with which patient stratification based on the manually validated data was reproduced with the automatically obtained data was also assessed for each method. The results shows that two methods were less influenced by errors in automatic recognition of long-term ECG than were the other two methods.<<ETX>>

[1]  A J Camm,et al.  Significance of long term components of heart rate variability for the further prognosis after acute myocardial infarction. , 1990, Cardiovascular research.

[2]  J. Miller,et al.  Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  A J Camm,et al.  Prognostic value of reduced heart rate variability after myocardial infarction: clinical evaluation of a new analysis method. , 1991, British heart journal.

[4]  A. Camm,et al.  Heart rate variability in relation to prognosis after myocardial infarction: selection of optimal processing techniques. , 1989, European heart journal.

[5]  D. Ewing,et al.  New method for assessing cardiac parasympathetic activity using 24 hour electrocardiograms. , 1984, British heart journal.

[6]  M Malik,et al.  Circadian rhythm of heart rate variability after acute myocardial infarction and its influence on the prognostic value of heart rate variability. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  O Odemuyiwa,et al.  Comparison of the predictive characteristics of heart rate variability index and left ventricular ejection fraction for all-cause mortality, arrhythmic events and sudden death after acute myocardial infarction. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Components of heart rate variability measured during healing of acute myocardial infarction. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.