The Food Searching Behaviour of Two European Thrushes. Ii: the Adaptiveness of the Search Patterns

1) This study describes the searching behaviour of two thrushes foraging for both naturally occurring and artificial foods. I have paid particular attention to temporal and spatial changes in searching behaviour and have attempted to answer the question of whether the changes in searching behaviour were adaptive ones. 2) When thrushes captured an earthworm and continued searching, they showed a net change in patterning of the twelve turns following capture so that they probably searched the area surrounding the capture point more thoroughly than an area covering the same number of moves units before capture (Figs 4, 5; Table 1). This confirms N. TINBERGEN'S (1967) hypothesis that path changes sometimes follow prey capture in bird predators. Since earthworms on the study meadow were aggregated in distribution, the net change in path may have been of adaptive value to the thrushes, by concentrating their search where further prey items were most likely to occur. It was not, however, possible to relate the increased searching effort quantitatively to the size of the earthworm aggregates. (3) The thrushes were then presented with populations of cryptically-coloured artificial prey in random, regular and aggregated distributions at each of two densities (Fig. 7). The movements of the thrushes (mainly blackbirds) feeding on these prey were recorded as described by SMITH (1974). (4) The overall distribution of the search paths of the thrushes showed a correspondence with the distributions of the artificial food populations (Fig. 9). The thrushes made larger turns and showed less tendency to alternate left and right turns at the higher density (Tables 8, 11), thus helping them to maintain their search paths within the smaller confines of the high density populations. (5) The capture rates of the thrushes at the two prey densities were roughly proportional to the differences in prey density (Table 4). Although there were suggestions of differing capture rates, unforeseen errors in experimental procedure did not allow firm conclusions on the effects of thrush predation on the different prey distributions within each density. (6) The presentation of the cryptic artificial prey led to an increase in the average length of moves made by blackbirds (Fig. 10; Table 5). Further increases in move length followed the cutting of the grass on the study meadow (Fig. 13) and the introduction of more conspicuous artificial prey (Figs 11, 12). It is suggested that the increases in move lengths were an adaptive reaction by the blackbirds to increases in prey detectability. (7) Captures of single artificial prey were preceded by larger than average turns and were followed by larger than average turns in the opposite direction (Table 9). (8) The presentation of the artificial food led to an overall increase in the speed of movement of the blackbirds (Table 10). (9) After the capture of prey in the low density random and aggregated populations thrushes showed a net tendency to concentrate their searching in the area surrounding the site of prey capture (Fig. 16; Table 12), similar to that shown after the capture of earthworms. This was not shown after the capture of regularly distributed prey (Figs 16, 17 ; Table 12), nor was it clearly shown after the capture of prey in the high density random and aggregated distributions (Fig. 17; Table 12). (10) The overall speed of movement was greater over the ten moves preceding capture than over the ten moves following capture in the low density regular distribution (Table 13). (11) The changes in searching behaviour following capture are discussed with reference to N. TINBERGEN'S (1967) hypothesis that predators select for 'spacing out' in prey. (12) A method is presented which allowed the measurement of the wild blackbirds' abilities to detect the artificial prey supplied (Figs 18-20). The 'risk' to the artificial prey was high when the blackbirds were within 20 cm of the prey, but fell to near zero at a distance of 120 cm. (Fig. 21). The square root of the risk was linearly related to the distance between predator and prey (Fig. 22). The measures of the detection ability of the blackbirds are discussed in relation to their movement patterns. (13) The results are discussed in light of the general problem of whether predatory animals show adaptive flexibility in response to spatial and temporal variations in food supply. I have argued that at least some aspects of the thrushes' behaviour provide evidence for such flexibility. I have emphasised that the basic 'unpredictability' of the environment, which generates the need for behavioural plasticity, also makes it unrealistic to expect to find predators making optimally adapted responses to all variations in the environment.

[1]  C. A. Fleschner Studies on searching capacity of the larvae of three predators of the citrus red mite , 1950 .

[2]  B. Clarke,et al.  Evidence for Apostatic Selection by Wild Passerines , 1968, Nature.

[3]  G. Orians,et al.  Overlap in Foods and Foraging of Four Species of Blackbirds in the Potholes of Central Washington , 1969 .

[4]  C. Banks The behaviour of individual coccinellid larvae on plants , 1957 .

[5]  H. S. Horn,et al.  The Adaptive Significance of Colonial Nesting in the Brewer's Blackbird (Euphagus Cyanocephalus) , 1968 .

[6]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[7]  J. Allen Evidence for Stabilizing and Apostatic Selection by Wild Blackbirds , 1972, Nature.

[8]  J. Laing Host-Finding by Insect Parasites , 1938 .

[9]  T. Royama Factors Governing the Hunting Behaviour and Selection of Food by the Great Tit (Parus major L.) , 1970 .

[10]  R. Holmes Feeding Ecology of the Red‐Backed Sandpiper (Calidris Alpina) in Arctic Alaska , 1966 .

[11]  I. Vine,et al.  Risk of visual detection and pursuitby a predator and the selective advantage of flocking behaviour. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  F. Olson The Survival Value of Fish Schooling , 1964 .

[13]  Gillian M. Morrell,et al.  Experiments On Mimicry: I. the Response of Wild Birds To Artificial Prey , 1970 .

[14]  G. Williams Adaptation and Natural Selection. (Book Reviews: Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought) , 2018 .

[15]  R. K. Murton The Significance of a Specific Search Image in the Feeding Behaviour of the Wood-Pigeon , 1971 .

[16]  J. Krebs Territory and breeding density in the Great Tit , 1971 .

[17]  R. Paine,et al.  Trophic Relationships of 8 Sympatric Predatory Gastropods , 1963 .

[18]  R. Andrew The Aggressive and Courtship Behaviour of Certain Emberizines , 1956 .

[19]  Robert H. Riffenburgh,et al.  Fish Schooling: A Possible Factor in Reducing Predation , 1960 .

[20]  L. Tinbergen The Natural Control of Insects in Pinewoods , 1960 .

[21]  Hugh A Ford,et al.  The degree of mimetic protection gained by new partial mimics , 1971, Heredity.

[22]  George C. Williams,et al.  Adaptation and Natural Selection , 2018 .

[23]  V. S. Ivlev,et al.  Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes , 1962 .

[24]  R. C. Lasiewski,et al.  A Re-Examination of the Relation between Standard Metabolic Rate and Body Weight in Birds , 1967 .

[25]  C. S. Holling The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density , 1966 .

[26]  C. S. Holling,et al.  The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. , 1965 .

[27]  James Smith,et al.  The Food Searching Behaviour of Two European Thrushes , 1974 .

[28]  R. Dawkins,et al.  The hunting behaviour of individual great tits in relation to spatial variations in their food density , 1971 .

[29]  I. J. Patterson Timing and spacing of broods in the black-headed gull , 2008 .

[30]  H. Kruuk,et al.  COMPARATIVE NOTES ON PREDATION BY LION, LEOPARD, CHEETAH AND WILD DOG IN THE SERENGETI AREA, EAST AFRICA , 1967 .

[31]  W. Hamilton Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  M. Hassell,et al.  EVALUATION OF PARASITE OR PREDATOR RESPONSES , 1966 .

[33]  L. Tinbergen The natural control of insects in pinewoods. I. Factors influencing the intensity of predation by songbirds , 1960 .

[34]  J. Beukema Predation by the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.): the influence of hunger and experience. , 1968, Behaviour.

[35]  A. Dixon AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE SEARCHING BEHAVIOUR OF THE PREDATORY COCCINELLID BEETLE ADALIA DECEMPUNCTATA (L.) , 1959 .