Evidence-based cosmology and galactic rotation curves

A bijective analysis is confirming, the expansion of universal space has never been directly observed, and this assumption is unproven thus far. The measurement of the gravitational redshift, which was confirmed using the Mossbauer experiment, proves only the gravitational redshift and nothing more because there is no causality between the gravitational redshift and hypothetical expansion. Thus, even if the universal space is assumed to expand, the gravitational redshift cannot be assumed to be proof of the expansion. In addition, the Doppler effect was never observed in an expanding space; thus, the claim that the cosmological redshift is partially caused by the Doppler effect, which is caused by the expansion of space, is an unproven assumption. Furthermore, the discovery of cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation simply proves that the radiation is emitted by the entire universal space, but does not prove the existence of a recombination period. In evidence-based cosmology, every element in the model has a corresponding element in physical reality that is observed and measured. The evidence-based cosmology model is related to the real universe by a bijective function of set theory. Supermassive black holes in the centre of galaxies are rejuvenating systems of the universe. They rotate their local superfluid space which is the physical origin of galactic rotation curves.

[1]  Amrit Šorli ‎ Irrefutable Proof of The Non-Existence of a ‎Gravitational ‎Singularity at The Centre of a ‎Black Hole , 2023, International Journal of Fundamental Physical Sciences.

[2]  A. Šorli,et al.  Time as the result of the observer’s measurement , 2021, Physics Essays.

[3]  A. Šorli,et al.  Time-Invariant Superfluid Quantum Space as the Unified Field Theory , 2021 .

[4]  H. Traunmüller Does standard cosmology really predict the cosmic microwave background? , 2021, F1000Research.

[5]  H. Traunmüller Does standard cosmology really predict the cosmic microwave background? , 2020, F1000Research.

[6]  Y. Sanejouand A framework for the next generation of stationary cosmological models , 2020, International Journal of Modern Physics D.

[7]  R. Nemmen,et al.  Jet efficiencies and black hole spins in jetted quasars , 2020, 2005.00381.

[8]  D. Fiscaletti,et al.  Searching for an adequate relation between time and entanglement , 2017 .

[9]  M. Cluver,et al.  Discovery of a supercluster in the Zone of Avoidance in Vela , 2016, 1611.04615.

[10]  H. Ferreira Quantum field theory on rotating black hole spacetimes , 2015, 1509.07683.

[11]  Y. Hoffman,et al.  The Laniakea supercluster of galaxies , 2014, Nature.

[12]  M. Dopita,et al.  Shapley supercluster survey: galaxy evolution from filaments to cluster cores , 2014, 1407.4628.

[13]  Julian Barbour,et al.  The Nature of Time , 2009, 0903.3489.

[14]  C. Rovelli,et al.  Relational Quantum Mechanics , 2006 .

[15]  P. González-Díaz On the wave function of the universe , 1985 .

[16]  J. Draper History or the conflict between religion and science , 1975 .

[17]  J. P. Kelly The Great Design , 1936 .

[18]  F. Zwicky ON THE REDSHIFT OF SPECTRAL LINES THROUGH INTERSTELLAR SPACE. , 1929, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  A. Šorli,et al.  Dark energy, superfluid space, ether, and missing dark matter , 2023, Advanced Studies in Theoretical Physics.

[20]  D. Fiscaletti,et al.  Eternal universe in dynamic equilibrium , 2022, Physics Essays.

[21]  A. Šorli,et al.  Physical origin of the relative rate of clocks in GPS and errors of relative motion concept , 2022, Advanced Studies in Theoretical Physics.

[22]  A. Šorli,et al.  Back to the stationary cosmology , 2022, Advanced Studies in Theoretical Physics.

[23]  Paul J Steinhardl The inflation debate. , 2011, Scientific American.

[24]  J. Narlikar Alternative ideas in cosmology , 2005 .