Determining digital hemispherical photograph exposure for leaf area index estimation

A correct exposure is of crucial importance for accurate retrieval of canopy parameters using hemispherical photograph techniques. Digital hemispherical photographs were collected under different sky brightness conditions using a Nikon CoolPix 4500 camera with an FC-E8 fish-eye lens for canopies of different species and openness. Different exposure schemes were employedto investigatethe effects ofphotographic exposure ontheestimations ofthe effective leaf area index(Le)and gap fraction. The contrast between the sky and foliage under each exposure scheme was calculated to determine the correct exposure under different weather conditions. The results demonstrated that digital hemispherical photographs taken with automatic exposure are not reliable, causing Le underestimations by 16‐71% for medium and high density canopies (Le = 3.2‐4.8) and corresponding gap fraction overestimations by 18‐72%. While for open canopies with Le < 1.26, Le was overestimated by 11‐29%, and the corresponding gap fraction was underestimated by 4‐28%. Studies showed that increasing one stop of exposure results in 3‐28% differences inLe for canopies with different openness. Based on the analysis, we determined the optimum exposure and developed a protocol for acquiring digital hemispherical photographs. The protocol requires first measuring reference exposure for the open sky using a built-in camera light meter, and then take photographs inside the canopy using the same camera with two stops of more exposure than the reference exposure in order to make the sky appear white and consequently also maximize the contrast between theskyandfoliage.Thisprotocol isapplicablefordifferentskybrightnessandfordifferentcanopyopenness.Indensecanopies,this procedure requires much less exposure than automatic exposure, but in very open canopies, this procedure requires more exposure than automatic exposure. Using the exposure determined with this procedure rather than the automatic exposure, the comparison of Le values from the LAI-2000 and digital photographs is greatly improved, with R 2 increasing from 0.77 to 0.95, and RMSE

[1]  Craig Macfarlane,et al.  Photographic exposure affects indirect estimation of leaf area in plantations of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. , 2000 .

[2]  J. Chen.  Optically-based methods for measuring seasonal variation of leaf area index in boreal conifer stands , 1996 .

[3]  M. Battaglia,et al.  Prediction of leaf area index in eucalypt plantations: effects of water stress and temperature , 1998 .

[4]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Direct and Indirect Estimation of Leaf Area Index, fAPAR, and Net Primary Production of Terrestrial Ecosystems , 1999 .

[5]  J. Ross.  The radiation regime and architecture of plant stands , 1981, Tasks for vegetation sciences 3.

[6]  Jing M. Chen,et al.  Daily canopy photosynthesis model through temporal and spatial scaling for remote sensing applications , 1999 .

[7]  Sylvain G. Leblanc,et al.  A practical scheme for correcting multiple scattering effects on optical LAI measurements , 2001 .

[8]  Jing Chen,et al.  Net primary productivity following forest fire for Canadian ecoregions , 2000 .

[9]  D. Clark,et al.  Long-term study of solar radiation regimes in a tropical wet forest using quantum sensors and hemispherical photography , 1993 .

[10]  M. Gilabert,et al.  A comparison of direct and indirect methods for measuring leaf and surface areas of individual bushes , 1995 .

[11]  T. Spies,et al.  Using hemispherical photography for estimating photosynthetic photon flux density under canopies and in gaps in Douglas-fir forests of the Pacific Northwest , 1994 .

[12]  J. Chen,et al.  Defining leaf area index for non‐flat leaves , 1992 .

[13]  L. Olsson,et al.  Evaluation of forest-canopy photographs with diode-array scanner OSIRIS , 1982 .

[14]  Richard A. Fournier,et al.  Modelling light obstruction in three conifer forests using hemispherical photography and fine tree architecture , 1996 .

[15]  M. Weissa,et al.  Review of methods for in situ leaf area index ( LAI ) determination Part II . Estimation of LAI , errors and sampling , 2003 .

[16]  K. Blennow.  Sky View Factors from High-Resolution Scanned Fish-eye Lens Photographic Negatives , 1995 .

[17]  S. Running,et al.  Generalization of a forest ecosystem process model for other biomes, Biome-BGC, and an application for global-scale models. Scaling processes between leaf and landscape levels , 1993 .

[18]  Sven Wagner,et al.  Calibration of grey values of hemispherical photographs for image analysis , 1998 .

[19]  G. Russell,et al.  Leaf area index estimates obtained for clumped canopies using hemispherical photography , 1999 .

[20]  S. T. Gower,et al.  A comparison of optical and direct methods for estimating foliage surface area index in forests , 1994 .

[21]  P. R. van Gardingen,et al.  FOREST FIRE SMOKE AND A TEST OF HEMISPHERICAL PHOTOGRAPHY FOR PREDICTING UNDERSTOREY LIGHT IN BORNEAN TROPICAL RAIN FOREST , 1999 .

[22]  Sven Wagner,et al.  Relative radiance measurements and zenith angle dependent segmentation in hemispherical photography , 2001 .

[23]  Tiit Nilson,et al.  Inversion of gap frequency data in forest stands , 1999 .

[24]  P. Reich,et al.  Evaluation of several measures of canopy openness as predictors of photosynthetic photon flux density in deeply shaded conifer-dominated forest understory , 1999 .

[25]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Simulating forest productivity and surface-atmosphere carbon exchange in the BOREAS study region. , 1997, Tree physiology.

[26]  A. Lang,et al.  Comparative analysis of two indirect methods of measuring leaf area index as applied to minimal and spur pruned grape vines , 1994 .

[27]  D. Clark,et al.  Evaluation of digital and film hemispherical photography and spherical densiometry for measuring forest light environments. , 2000 .

[28]  Jing M. Chen,et al.  Canopy architecture and remote sensing of the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by boreal conifer forests , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[29]  Michael Nobis,et al.  Automatic thresholding for hemispherical canopy-photographs based on edge detection , 2005 .

[30]  J. Chen,et al.  Evaluation of hemispherical photography for determining plant area index and geometry of a forest stand , 1991 .

[31]  S. Gerstl,et al.  Nonlinear spectral mixing models for vegetative and soil surfaces , 1994 .

[32]  J. Norman,et al.  Instrument for Indirect Measurement of Canopy Architecture , 1991 .

[33]  Sylvain G. Leblanc,et al.  Methodology comparison for canopy structure parameters extraction from digital hemispherical photography in boreal forests , 2005 .

[34]  R. Samson,et al.  A comparison of optical and direct methods for monitoring the seasonal dynamics of leaf area index in deciduous forests. , 2001 .

[35]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination Part I. Theories, sensors and hemispherical photography , 2004 .

[36]  Photochemische Untersuchungen , 2022 .

[37]  J. Chen,et al.  A process-based boreal ecosystem productivity simulator using remote sensing inputs , 1997 .

[38]  R. Hall,et al.  A comparison of digital and film fisheye photography for analysis of forest canopy structure and gap light transmission , 2001 .

[39]  JASON R. ROXBURGH,et al.  USES AND LIMITATIONS OF HEMISPHERICAL PHOTOGRAPHY FOR ESTIMATING FOREST LIGHT ENVIRONMENTS , 2004 .

[40]  S. Hale,et al.  Comparison of film and digital hemispherical photography across a wide range of canopy densities , 2002 .

[41]  M. Kalacska,et al.  Calibration and assessment of seasonal changes in leaf area index of a tropical dry forest in different stages of succession. , 2005, Tree physiology.

[42]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Leaf area index of boreal forests: theory, techniques, and measurements , 1997 .

[43]  Josef Cihlar,et al.  Net primary productivity mapped for Canada at 1-km resolution , 2002 .