Super Nested Arrays: Linear Sparse Arrays With Reduced Mutual Coupling—Part I: Fundamentals

In array processing, mutual coupling between sensors has an adverse effect on the estimation of parameters (e.g., DOA). While there are methods to counteract this through appropriate modeling and calibration, they are usually computationally expensive, and sensitive to model mismatch. On the other hand, sparse arrays, such as nested arrays, coprime arrays, and minimum redundancy arrays (MRAs), have reduced mutual coupling compared to uniform linear arrays (ULAs). With <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$N$</tex-math></inline-formula> denoting the number of sensors, these sparse arrays offer <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$O({N}^{2})$</tex-math></inline-formula> freedoms for source estimation because their difference coarrays have <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX"> $O({N}^{2})$</tex-math></inline-formula>-long ULA segments. But these well-known sparse arrays have disadvantages: MRAs do not have simple closed-form expressions for the array geometry; coprime arrays have holes in the coarray; and nested arrays contain a dense ULA in the physical array, resulting in significantly higher mutual coupling than coprime arrays and MRAs. This paper introduces a new array called the super nested array, which has all the good properties of the nested array, and at the same time achieves reduced mutual coupling. There is a systematic procedure to determine sensor locations. For fixed <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$N$</tex-math></inline-formula>, the super nested array has the same physical aperture, and the same hole-free coarray as does the nested array. But the number of sensor pairs with small separations (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\lambda /2,2\times \lambda /2$</tex-math></inline-formula>, etc.) is significantly reduced. Many theoretical properties are proved and simulations are included to demonstrate the superior performance of these arrays. In the companion paper, a further extension called the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$Q$</tex-math></inline-formula>th-order super nested array is developed, which further reduces mutual coupling.

[1]  R. Bansal,et al.  Antenna theory; analysis and design , 1984, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[2]  Xu Xu,et al.  DOA Estimation for Uniform Linear Array with Mutual Coupling , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[3]  David G. Long,et al.  Array signal processing , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[4]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Sparse Sensing With Co-Prime Samplers and Arrays , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[5]  Petre Stoica,et al.  MUSIC, maximum likelihood, and Cramer-Rao bound , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[6]  Fabrizio Sellone,et al.  A Novel Online Mutual Coupling Compensation Algorithm for Uniform and Linear Arrays , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[7]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Nested Arrays: A Novel Approach to Array Processing With Enhanced Degrees of Freedom , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[8]  Hon Tat Hui,et al.  Mutual Coupling Compensation for Direction-of-Arrival Estimations Using the Receiving-Mutual-Impedance Method , 2010 .

[9]  M. Ishiguro Minimum redundancy linear arrays for a large number of antennas , 1980 .

[10]  P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Coprime sampling and the music algorithm , 2011, 2011 Digital Signal Processing and Signal Processing Education Meeting (DSP/SPE).

[11]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Super Nested Arrays: Linear Sparse Arrays With Reduced Mutual Coupling—Part II: High-Order Extensions , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  L. Godara Application of antenna arrays to mobile communications. II. Beam-forming and direction-of-arrival considerations , 1997, Proc. IEEE.

[13]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Direct-MUSIC on sparse arrays , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Signal Processing and Communications (SPCOM).

[14]  John R. Buck,et al.  Extending coprime sensor arrays to achieve the peak side lobe height of a full uniform linear array , 2014, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[15]  Luxi Yang,et al.  Blind Calibration and DOA Estimation With Uniform Circular Arrays in the Presence of Mutual Coupling , 2006, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[16]  H. Hui Improved Compensation for the Mutual Coupling Effect in a Dipole Array for Direction Finding , 2022 .

[17]  Douglas A. Gray,et al.  Positive-definite Toeplitz completion in DOA estimation for nonuniform linear antenna arrays. II. Partially augmentable arrays , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[18]  Hon Tat Hui,et al.  Decoupling Methods for the Mutual Coupling Effect in Antenna Arrays : A Review , 2007 .

[19]  Yimin Zhang,et al.  Generalized Coprime Array Configurations for Direction-of-Arrival Estimation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[20]  Harry L. Van Trees,et al.  Optimum Array Processing: Part IV of Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory , 2002 .

[21]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Correlation-aware techniques for sparse support recovery , 2012, 2012 IEEE Statistical Signal Processing Workshop (SSP).

[22]  E. HOWARD,et al.  Mutual Impedance of Unequal Length Antennas in Echelon * , 2000 .

[23]  M. Skolnik,et al.  Introduction to Radar Systems , 2021, Advances in Adaptive Radar Detection and Range Estimation.

[24]  Dean Zhao,et al.  A Sparse Representation Method for DOA Estimation With Unknown Mutual Coupling , 2012, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[25]  Moeness G. Amin,et al.  DOA estimation with co-prime arrays in the presence of mutual coupling , 2015, 2015 23rd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[26]  T. Minimum-Redundancy Linear Arrays , 2022 .

[27]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Remarks on the Spatial Smoothing Step in Coarray MUSIC , 2015, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[28]  C. Burrus,et al.  Array Signal Processing , 1989 .

[29]  Benjamin Friedlander A sensitivity analysis of the MUSIC algorithm , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[30]  Tariq S. Durrani,et al.  Temporal and spatial sampling influence on the estimates of superimposed narrowband signals: when less can mean more , 1996, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[31]  Alexei Gorokhov,et al.  Positive-definite Toeplitz completion in DOA estimation for nonuniform linear antenna arrays. II. Partially augmentable arrays , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[32]  S. Haykin,et al.  Nonredundant arrays , 1986, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[33]  I. S. Gál On the Representation of 1, 2, . . . , N by Differences , 2004 .

[34]  Anthony J. Weiss,et al.  Direction Finding In The Presence Of Mutual Coupling , 1991, Twenty-Second Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[35]  Thomas Svantesson,et al.  Modeling and estimation of mutual coupling in a uniform linear array of dipoles , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No.99CH36258).

[36]  E. Friel,et al.  Mutual coupling effects and their reduction in wideband direction of arrival estimation , 1994 .

[37]  T. Svantesson,et al.  Mutual coupling compensation using subspace fitting , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop. SAM 2000 (Cat. No.00EX410).

[38]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Direction of Arrival Estimation Using Co-Prime Arrays: A Super Resolution Viewpoint , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.