Integrating MRI and MRSI Information into TRUS-Guided Robotic Prostate Biopsy

The development of prostate biopsy robotics can make biopsies both automatic and accurate. However, intervention from urologists is still needed to define the location of biopsy cores. With the aid of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) diagnosis information obtained pre-operationally, it is possible to guide the biopsy needle towards those sites where cancer is suspected, thereby achieving higher detection rates. In this paper, a deformable image registration method is presented for the purpose of merging MRI/MRSI and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images. Given the poor quality of ultrasound (US) images and the deformation occurring across modalites, a thin-plate spline transformation is used to match the prostate surfaces and thereafter their volumes. A deformable prostate phantom that simulates the condition in humans was also set up for validation purposes. Fifteen fiducial markers were implanted inside the phantom prostate to act as the reference of "ground truth." The phantom study shows that our method can achieve an accuracy around 1.28 ± 0.50 mm, with voxel dimensions of 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 mm3. This result is promising since none of the knowledge about the interior prostate is utilized in the algorithm. Experimental results on patient data are also presented.

[1]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Deformable image registration for the use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in prostate treatment planning. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Snakes: Active contour models , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[3]  Charles R. Meyer,et al.  Demonstration of accuracy and clinical versatility of mutual information for automatic multimodality image fusion using affine and thin-plate spline warped geometric deformations , 1997, Medical Image Anal..

[4]  David L. Wilson,et al.  Automatic MR volume registration and its evaluation for the pelvis and prostate. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Optimized prostate biopsy via a statistical atlas of cancer spatial distribution , 2004, Medical Image Anal..

[6]  P L Roberson,et al.  Impact of ultrasound and computed tomography prostate volume registration on evaluation of permanent prostate implants. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  M. Terris,et al.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[8]  S L Schoeppel,et al.  Treatment planning issues related to prostate movement in response to differential filling of the rectum and bladder. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  M van Herk,et al.  Quantification of organ motion during conformal radiotherapy of the prostate by three dimensional image registration. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Jonathan S. Lewin,et al.  Slice-to-volume registration and its potential application to interventional MRI-guided radio-frequency thermal ablation of prostate cancer , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  S. Pathak,et al.  Ultrasonography and fluoroscopic fusion for prostate brachytherapy dosimetry. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  M. Zaider,et al.  Treatment planning for prostate implants using magnetic-resonance spectroscopy imaging. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Spatial Transformation and Registration of Brain Images Using Elastically Deformable Models , 1997, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[14]  David L Wilson,et al.  A comparative study of warping and rigid body registration for the prostate and pelvic MR volumes. , 2003, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[15]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2005 , 2005, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[16]  J. Roy,et al.  Prostate gland motion and deformation caused by needle placement during brachytherapy. , 2002, Brachytherapy.

[17]  L. Holmberg,et al.  The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. , 1997, Urology.

[18]  Simon R. Arridge,et al.  A survey of hierarchical non-linear medical image registration , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[19]  G E Hanks,et al.  Initial clinical assessment of CT-MRI image fusion software in localization of the prostate for 3D conformal radiation therapy. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  A. D'Amico,et al.  Evaluation of three-dimensional finite element-based deformable registration of pre- and intraoperative prostate imaging. , 2001, Medical physics.

[21]  David L Wilson,et al.  Automatic registration of MR and SPECT images for treatment planning in prostate cancer. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[22]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[23]  A L Boyer,et al.  An image correlation procedure for digitally reconstructed radiographs and electronic portal images. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  Peter Stanwell,et al.  Detection of prostate cancer by magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy in vivo , 2003, ANZ journal of surgery.

[25]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  W S Ng,et al.  Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for the detection of tumor foci in men with prior negative transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[27]  Nobuhiko Hata,et al.  Quantitative MR imaging assessment of prostate gland deformation before and during MR imaging-guided brachytherapy. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[28]  T Haycocks,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the radiation treatment planning of localized prostate cancer using intra-prostatic fiducial markers for computed tomography co-registration. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[29]  K. Badani,et al.  Prospective evaluation of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging to detect tumor foci in men with prior negative prostastic biopsy: a pilot study. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[30]  Marco Zaider,et al.  Towards integrating functional imaging in the treatment of prostate cancer with radiation: the registration of the MR spectroscopy imaging to ultrasound/CT images and its implementation in treatment planning. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..