Breast vibro-acoustography: initial experience in benign lesions

BackgroundVibro-acoustography (VA) is a newly developed imaging technology that is based on low-frequency vibrations induced in the object by the radiation force of ultrasound. VA is sensitive to the dynamic characteristics of tissue. Here, we evaluate the performance of VA in identifying benign lesions and compare the results to those of mammography.MethodsAn integrated mammography-VA system designed for in vivo breast imaging was tested on a group of female volunteers, age ≥ 18 years, with suspected breast lesions based on clinical examination. A set of VA scans was acquired after each corresponding mammography. Most lesions were classified as benign based on their histological results. However, in 4 cases, initial diagnosis based on clinical imaging determined that the lesions were cysts. These cysts were aspirated with needle aspiration and disappeared completely under direct ultrasound visualization. Therefore, no biopsies were performed on these cases and lesions were classified as benign based on clinical findings per clinical standards. To define the VA characteristics of benign breast masses, we adopted the features that are normally attributed to such masses in mammography. In a blinded assessment, three radiologists evaluated the VA images independently. The diagnostic accuracy of VA for detection of benign lesions was assessed by comparing the reviewers’ evaluations with clinical data.ResultsOut of a total 29 benign lesions in the group, the reviewers were able to locate all lesions on VA images and mammography, 100% with (95% confidence interval (CI): 88% to 100%). Two reviewers were also able to correctly classify 83% (95% CI: 65% to 92%), and the third reviewer 86% (95% CI: 65% to 95%) of lesions, as benign on VA images and 86% (95% CI: 69% to 95%) on mammography.ConclusionsThe results suggest that the mammographic characteristics of benign lesion may also be used to identify such lesions in VA. Furthermore, the results show the ability of VA to detect benign breast abnormalities with a performance comparable to mammography. Therefore, the VA technology has the potential to be utilized as a complementary tool for breast imaging applications. Additional studies are needed to compare the capabilities of VA and traditional ultrasound imaging.

[1]  Mostafa Fatemi,et al.  A Review of Vibro-acoustography and its Applications in Medicine. , 2011, Current medical imaging reviews.

[2]  V Shane Pankratz,et al.  Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  James F. Greenleaf,et al.  Performance of vibro-acoustography in detecting microcalcifications in excised human breast tissue: a study of 74 tissue samples , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Yan Song,et al.  Preliminary results of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) ultrasound imaging of breast lesions. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  James F. Greenleaf,et al.  Implementation of vibro-acoustography on a clinical ultrasound system , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[6]  Richard G Barr,et al.  Effects of Precompression on Elasticity Imaging of the Breast , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[7]  R. Ehman,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography: A review , 2010, Clinical anatomy.

[8]  James F. Greenleaf,et al.  Imaging and Evaluating the Elastic Properties of Biological Tissues , 2000 .

[9]  Enzo Galligioni,et al.  Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up. , 2011, European journal of cancer.

[10]  V. Shane Pankratz,et al.  Mammographic Breast Density as a General Marker of Breast Cancer Risk , 2007, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[11]  Min Bai,et al.  Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Technology , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[12]  W. Berg,et al.  Cystic lesions of the breast: sonographic-pathologic correlation. , 2003, Radiology.

[13]  E. Beckjord,et al.  Diagnostic Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy , 2009, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[14]  Etta D Pisano,et al.  Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. , 2012, JAMA.

[15]  L. Liberman,et al.  Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[16]  Eun-Kyung Kim,et al.  Probably benign breast lesions on ultrasonography: A retrospective review of ultrasonographic features and clinical factors affecting the BI-RADS categorization , 2010, Acta radiologica.

[17]  Richard G Barr,et al.  Real-Time Ultrasound Elasticity of the Breast: Initial Clinical Results , 2010, Ultrasound quarterly.

[18]  J F Greenleaf,et al.  Probing the dynamics of tissue at low frequencies with the radiation force of ultrasound. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Mostafa Fatemi,et al.  Breast vibro-acoustography: initial results show promise , 2012, Breast Cancer Research.

[20]  E A Sickles,et al.  Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound: A retrospective review , 1996, Cancer.

[21]  Jean B. Cormack,et al.  Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. , 2008, JAMA.

[22]  David O. Cosgrove,et al.  Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible , 2011, European Radiology.

[23]  M. Fink,et al.  Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[24]  G. Trahey,et al.  Shear-wave generation using acoustic radiation force: in vivo and ex vivo results. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[25]  James F. Greenleaf,et al.  Vibro-acoustic tissue mammography , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.

[27]  P. Langenberg,et al.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  E. Pisano,et al.  American College of Radiology Imaging Network , 2002 .

[29]  V. Muglia,et al.  Breast ultrasound diagnostic performance and outcomes for mass lesions using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 0 mammogram , 2011, Clinics.

[30]  Mathias Fink,et al.  Imaging of complex media with acoustic and seismic waves , 2002 .

[31]  J F Greenleaf,et al.  Vibro-acoustography: an imaging modality based on ultrasound-stimulated acoustic emission. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Hui-Xiong Xu,et al.  Diagnostic Value of Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification for Breast Lesions with Different Size , 2014, BioMed research international.

[33]  E. Conant,et al.  A Review of Breast Ultrasound , 2006, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

[34]  Mostafa Fatemi,et al.  Thermal safety of vibro-acoustography using a confocal transducer. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[35]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Two-view versus single-view shear-wave elastography: comparison of observer performance in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses. , 2014, Radiology.

[36]  J. Greenleaf,et al.  Ultrasound-stimulated vibro-acoustic spectrography. , 1998, Science.

[37]  Mostafa Fatemi,et al.  Application of Vibro‐acoustography for Detection of Calcified Arteries in Breast Tissue , 2004, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[38]  K. Brandt,et al.  Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[39]  James F. Greenleaf,et al.  Imaging mass lesions by vibro-acoustography: modeling and experiments , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[40]  Sharon Bond,et al.  Screening With Ultrasound at Time of Mammography Improves Disease Detection in Women at Higher Risk for Breast Cancer, but False Positives Increase , 2008 .

[41]  A. Stavros,et al.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. , 1995, Radiology.

[42]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  MR elastography of breast lesions: Understanding the solid/liquid duality can improve the specificity of contrast‐enhanced MR mammography , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[43]  Carolyn Mies,et al.  Posterior Acoustic Shadowing in Benign Breast Lesions , 2004, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[44]  Navin Parekh,et al.  Effects of mammographic density and benign breast disease on breast cancer risk (United States) , 2001, Cancer Causes & Control.

[45]  Mostafa Fatemi,et al.  Preliminary in vivo breast vibro-acoustography results with a quasi-2-d array transducer: a step forward. , 2014, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[46]  A. Sattar,et al.  Addition of shear-wave elastography during second-look MR imaging-directed breast US: effect on lesion detection and biopsy targeting. , 2014, Radiology.

[47]  E A Sickles,et al.  Benign breast lesions: ultrasound detection and diagnosis. , 1984, Radiology.

[48]  B. Garra,et al.  Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. , 1997, Radiology.

[49]  Mostafa Fatemi,et al.  Potential Applications of Vibro-acoustography in Breast Imaging , 2005, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[50]  Armando Manduca,et al.  Imaging elastic properties of biological tissues by low-frequency harmonic vibration , 2003, Proc. IEEE.

[51]  Mostafa Fatemi,et al.  Critical issues in breast imaging by vibro-acoustography. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[52]  D. Noh,et al.  Clinical application of shear wave elastography (SWE) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast diseases , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[53]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Sonoelastographic Strain Index for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Nonpalpable Breast Masses , 2010, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[54]  James F. Greenleaf,et al.  Imaging the Viscoelastic Properties of Tissue , 2002 .