Realistic acoustic prediction models to efficiently design higher layer protocols in underwater wireless sensor networks

The study of Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks (UWSNs) as a research field has grown significantly in recent years offering a multitude of proposals for resolving the communication between nodes and protocols for information exchange networks. Acoustics has been used by nature for many millennia to communicate in underwater environments as a language; dolphins and whales for instance are able to use it for sending information between their groups. Wireless sensor networks have been proposed for their deployment in underwater environments where many applications, such as aquiculture, pollution monitoring, offshore exploration, etc., would benefit from this technology. Despite having a very similar functionality, Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks exhibit several architectural differences with respect to the terrestrial ones, which are mainly due to transmission medium characteristics (sea water) and the signal employed to transmit data (acoustic ultrasound signals). Then, the design of appropriate network architecture for UWSNs is seriously hardened by the conditions of the communication system and, as a consequence, what is valid for terrestrial WSNs is perhaps not valid for UWSNs. So, a general review of the overall network architecture is required in order to supply an appropriate network service for the demanding applications in such an unfriendly submarine communication environment. Propagation conditions in an underwater acoustic channel are known to vary in time, causing the received signal strength to deviate from the nominal value predicted by a Deterministic Propagation Model (DPM). To facilitate large-scale system design under such conditions (e.g. power allocation), we develop a Statistical Propagation Model (SPM) in which the transmission loss is treated as a random variable. By repetitive computation of an acoustic field using a ray tracing tool (DPM) for a set of varying environmental conditions (surface height, wave activity, small displacements of a transmitter and a receiver around nominal locations), an ensemble of transmission losses is compiled which is then used to infer the statistical model parameters. A reasonable agreement is found with log-normal distribution, whose mean obeys a log-distance increase, and whose variance appears to be constant for a certain range of inter-node distances in a given deployment location. A statistical prediction model is deemed useful for higher-level system planning where simulation is needed to assess the performance of candidate network protocols under various resource allocation policies, i.e. to determine the transmitting power and bandwidth allocation necessary to achieve a desired level of performance (connectivity, throughput, reliability, etc.).

[1]  Roberto Petroccia,et al.  Performance evaluation of underwater MAC protocols: From simulation to at-sea testing , 2011, OCEANS 2011 IEEE - Spain.

[2]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  State of the art in protocol research for underwater acoustic sensor networks , 2006, MOCO.

[3]  Sergio M. Jesus,et al.  Doppler domain decomposition of the underwater acoustic channel response , 2011, OCEANS 2011 IEEE - Spain.

[4]  P. Karn,et al.  MACA-a New Channel Access Method for Packet Radio , 1990 .

[5]  J. Bellingham,et al.  Autonomous Oceanographic Sampling Networks , 1993 .

[6]  J. A. Catipovic,et al.  Phase-coherent digital communications for underwater acoustic channels , 1994 .

[7]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  On the impact of the environment on MAC and routing in shallow water scenarios , 2011, OCEANS 2011 IEEE - Spain.

[8]  J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves,et al.  Floor acquisition multiple access (FAMA) for packet-radio networks , 1995, SIGCOMM '95.

[9]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  World ocean simulation system (WOSS): a simulation tool for underwater networks with realistic propagation modeling , 2009, WUWNet.

[10]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  Modeling the underwater acoustic channel in ns2 , 2007, Valuetools 2007.

[11]  Andrew S. Tanenbaum,et al.  Computer networks (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[12]  Leonardo Badia,et al.  A study of incremental redundancy hybrid ARQ over Markov channel models derived from experimental data , 2010, WUWNet.

[13]  Robert J. Urick,et al.  Principles of underwater sound , 1975 .

[14]  M. Porter,et al.  Gaussian beam tracing for computing ocean acoustic fields , 1987 .

[15]  J. G. Proakis,et al.  Direct sequence spread spectrum based modem for under water acoustic communication and channel measurements , 1999, Oceans '99. MTS/IEEE. Riding the Crest into the 21st Century. Conference and Exhibition. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37008).

[17]  Peng Xie,et al.  VBF: Vector-Based Forwarding Protocol for Underwater Sensor Networks , 2006, Networking.

[18]  W.-B. Yang,et al.  Characterization and Modeling of Underwater Acoustic Communications Channels for Frequency-Shift-Keying Signals , 2006, OCEANS 2006.

[19]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Performance of adaptive MC-CDMA detectors in rapidly fading Rayleigh channels , 2003, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun..

[20]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Distance aware collision avoidance protocol for ad-hoc underwater acoustic sensor networks , 2007, IEEE Communications Letters.

[21]  J. Gibson,et al.  Incorporating Realistic Acoustic Propagation Models in Simulation of Underwater Acoustic Networks: A Statistical Approach , 2006, OCEANS 2006.

[22]  Jun-Hong Cui,et al.  DBR: Depth-Based Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks , 2008, Networking.

[23]  Kee Chaing Chua,et al.  Aloha-Based MAC Protocols with Collision Avoidance for Underwater Acoustic Networks , 2007, IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[24]  Kevin B. Smith CONVERGENCE, STABILITY, AND VARIABILITY OF SHALLOW WATER ACOUSTIC PREDICTIONS USING A SPLIT-STEP FOURIER PARABOLIC EQUATION MODEL , 2001 .

[25]  V. S. Vladimirov,et al.  Equations of mathematical physics , 1972 .

[26]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Wireless sensor networks: a survey , 2002, Comput. Networks.

[27]  Norman M. Abramson,et al.  Development of the ALOHANET , 1985, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[28]  Joseph A. Rice,et al.  A Discovery Process for Initializing Underwater Acoustic Networks , 2010, 2010 Fourth International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications.

[29]  William G Van Dorn,et al.  Oceanography and Seamanship , 1974 .

[30]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  A performance comparison of MAC protocols for underwater networks using a realistic channel simulator , 2009, OCEANS 2009.

[31]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Analysis of the impact of channel estimation errors on the performance of a decision-feedback equalizer in fading multipath channels , 1995, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[32]  J. Trumpf,et al.  Visible Spectrum Optical Communication and Distance Sensing for Underwater Applications , 2004 .

[33]  Vaduvur Bharghavan,et al.  MACAW: a media access protocol for wireless LAN's , 1994, SIGCOMM 1994.

[34]  Pekka Lilja,et al.  Simulating devices with adaptive antenna arrays using OPNET integrated with MATLAB , 2009, PM2HW2N '09.

[35]  Brian Neil Levine,et al.  A survey of practical issues in underwater networks , 2006, MOCO.

[36]  Rodney F. W. Coates,et al.  Underwater Acoustic Systems , 1990 .

[37]  Yuan Li,et al.  Research challenges and applications for underwater sensor networking , 2006, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2006. WCNC 2006..

[38]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Focused beam routing protocol for underwater acoustic networks , 2008, Underwater Networks.

[39]  Lee Freitag,et al.  HIGH-RATE PHASE COHERENT ACOUSTIC COMMUNICATION: A REVIEW OF A DECADE O F RESEARCH AND A PER SPECTIVE ON FUTURE CHALLENGES , 2004 .

[40]  Lee Freitag,et al.  From underwater simulation to at-sea testing using the ns-2 network simulator , 2011, OCEANS 2011 IEEE - Spain.

[41]  Seung-Geun Kim,et al.  Characterization of underwater acoustic channel using slowly moving transmitter in shallow water , 2011, OCEANS 2011 IEEE - Spain.

[42]  Jiejun Kong,et al.  The challenges of building mobile underwater wireless networks for aquatic applications , 2006, IEEE Network.

[43]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  Multi-cluster protocol for ad hoc mobile underwater acoustic networks , 2003, Oceans 2003. Celebrating the Past ... Teaming Toward the Future (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37492).

[44]  S. M. Jesus,et al.  Probe timing optimization for time-reversal underwater communications , 2011, OCEANS 2011 IEEE - Spain.

[45]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  Slotted FAMA: a MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks , 2006, OCEANS 2006 - Asia Pacific.

[46]  Michael B. Porter,et al.  Computational Ocean Acoustics , 1994 .

[47]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges , 2005, Ad Hoc Networks.

[48]  S. Rosenbush,et al.  Sin cables, sin normas y a bajo precio , 2004 .