[The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies].
暂无分享,去创建一个
Douglas G Altman | Peter C Gøtzsche | Matthias Egger | Stuart J Pocock | Erik von Elm | Jan P Vandenbroucke | S. Pocock | D. Altman | J. Vandenbroucke | E. von Elm | P. Gøtzsche | M. Egger
[1] What is newsworthy? , 1996, The Lancet.
[2] V. McCormack,et al. Issues in the reporting of epidemiological studies: a survey of recent practice , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[3] D. Moher,et al. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. , 2001, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.
[4] A. Dobson,et al. RE: “QUALITY OF REPORTING OF OBSERVATIONAL LONGITUDINAL RESEARCH” , 2005 .
[5] Douglas G Altman,et al. Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. , 2001, BMJ.
[6] David L Schriger,et al. Suggestions for improving the reporting of clinical research: the role of narrative. , 2005, Annals of emergency medicine.
[7] D. Moher,et al. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review , 2006, The Medical journal of Australia.
[8] Paul Glasziou,et al. Assessing the quality of research , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[9] S. Pocock,et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration , 2007, Epidemiology.
[10] David Moher,et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. , 2003, Clinical chemistry.
[11] D. Moher,et al. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials , 2001, The Lancet.
[12] A. Ormerod. CONSORT your submissions: an update for authors. , 2001 .
[13] John P.A. Ioannidis,et al. Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.
[14] G. Smith,et al. Meta-analysis Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies , 1998, BMJ.
[15] I. Olkin,et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement , 1999, The Lancet.
[16] J. Ioannidis,et al. Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[17] Paolo Vineis,et al. A road map for efficient and reliable human genome epidemiology , 2006, Nature Genetics.
[18] M. Hotopf,et al. Bias in psychiatric case–control studies , 2007, British Journal of Psychiatry.
[19] S. Pocock,et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies , 2007, The Lancet.
[20] J. Higgins,et al. Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. , 2007, International journal of epidemiology.
[21] David Moher,et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. , 2004, Family practice.
[22] A R Feinstein,et al. Clinical epidemiological quality in molecular genetic research: the need for methodological standards. , 1999, JAMA.
[23] David Moher,et al. Reporting Randomized, Controlled Trials of Herbal Interventions: An Elaborated CONSORT Statement , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[24] D. Moher,et al. Opportunities and challenges for improving the quality of reporting clinical research: CONSORT and beyond , 2004, Canadian Medical Association Journal.
[25] M Egger,et al. Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials. , 2001, JAMA.
[26] D. Rennie. CONSORT revised--improving the reporting of randomized trials. , 2001, JAMA.
[27] N. Black. Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care , 1996, BMJ.