Parsing in a Dynamical System: An Attractor-based Account of the Interaction of Lexical and Structural Constraints in Sentence Processing
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. H. Kawamoto. Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distributed processing account. , 1993 .
[2] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[3] M K Tanenhaus,et al. A constraint-based lexicalist account of the subject/object attachment preference , 1994, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[4] B. MacWhinney,et al. The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. , 1992 .
[5] Susan M. Garnsey,et al. Evidence for the immediate use of verb control information in sentence processing , 1990 .
[6] K. Rayner,et al. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.
[7] Bradley L. Pritchett. Grammatical Competence and Parsing Performance , 1992 .
[8] Fernando J. Pineda. Recurrent backpropagation networks , 1995 .
[9] Christopher T. Kello,et al. Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[10] D C Plaut,et al. Simulating brain damage. , 1993, Scientific American.
[11] Yves Chauvin,et al. Backpropagation: theory, architectures, and applications , 1995 .
[12] Lyn Frazier,et al. Against lexical generation of syntax , 1989 .
[13] L. Perko. Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems , 1991 .
[14] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. Lesioning an attractor network: investigations of acquired dyslexia. , 1991, Psychological review.
[15] J. Elman. Learning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small , 1993, Cognition.
[16] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. , 1993 .
[17] Marc Brysbaert,et al. Exposure-based models of human parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (nonlexical) statistical records , 1995 .
[18] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .
[19] Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al. Integrating discourse and local constraints in resolving lexical thematic ambiguities , 1996 .
[20] W. Nelson Francis,et al. FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .
[21] Jay L. Garfield,et al. Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural-Language Understanding , 1987 .
[22] Eugene Charniak,et al. Statistical language learning , 1997 .
[23] J. Woolley,et al. Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[24] B. MacWhinney,et al. Functionalism and the competition model , 1989 .
[25] Beatrice Santorini,et al. Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank , 1993, CL.
[26] Yuen Ren Chao,et al. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology , 1950 .
[27] J. Hayes. Cognition and the development of language , 1970 .
[28] Michael J. Spivey,et al. Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[29] James L. McClelland,et al. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.
[30] Julie C. Sedivy,et al. Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints , 1995, Cognition.
[31] Brian MacWhinney,et al. Functional constraints on sentence processing: A cross-linguistic study , 1982, Cognition.
[32] Robert L. Mercer,et al. Class-Based n-gram Models of Natural Language , 1992, CL.
[33] Cynthia Fisher,et al. On the semantic content of subcategorization frames , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.
[34] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .
[35] Barak A. Pearlmutter. Gradient calculations for dynamic recurrent neural networks: a survey , 1995, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.
[36] Daniel Jurafsky,et al. A Probabilistic Model of Lexical and Syntactic Access and Disambiguation , 1996, Cogn. Sci..
[37] Whitney Tabor,et al. Lexical Change as Nonlinear Interpolation , 1995 .
[38] J. Trueswell. THE ROLE OF LEXICAL FREQUENCY IN SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION , 1996 .
[39] Don C. Mitchell,et al. Verb guidance and other lexical effects in parsing , 1989 .
[40] John C. Trueswell,et al. Chapter 7 – Sentence Comprehension , 1995 .
[41] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..
[42] Susan M. Garnsey,et al. Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .
[43] J. Henderson,et al. Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[44] William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al. Lexical Representation and Process , 1991 .
[45] R. Abraham,et al. Dynamics--the geometry of behavior , 1983 .
[46] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. Lesioning an attractor network: investigations of acquired dyslexia , 1991 .