Motivation, Social Identity and Ideology Conviction in OSS Communities: The Mediating Role of Effort Intensity and Goal Commitment

Research has found salient individual and social motivating factors that influence participants’ involvement and contribution to OSS projects. Yet, these factors were examined independently from each other, and the mechanisms of their impacts were unclear. This paper is a first attempt to have a better and complete understanding of the phenomenon. We theorize an integrated model on the effects of personal motivation, social identity and ideology conviction on individuals’ task performance in and satisfaction with open source software projects. In particular, we posit that these motivating factors are translated into performance and satisfaction through effort intensity and goal commitment. Also, we contend that task performance positively affects an individual’s satisfaction with a specific OSS project.

[1]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: An Examination of Construct Validity , 1996, Journal of vocational behavior.

[2]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  Motivation and performance in industrial selling: Present knowledge and needed research. , 1977 .

[3]  Sandra Slaughter,et al.  Understanding the Motivations, Participation, and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[4]  N. Ellemers,et al.  MOTIVATING INDIVIDUALS AND GROUPS AT WORK : A SOCIAL IDENTITY PERSPECTIVE ON LEADERSHIP AND GROUP PERFORMANCE , 2004 .

[5]  Robert A. Peterson,et al.  The Effect of Effort on Sales Performance and Job Satisfaction , 1994 .

[6]  Steven P. Brown,et al.  A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. , 1996, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  N. Bowie,et al.  Book Review: Work Performance and Satisfaction: The Work Ethic: Working Values and Values That Work , 1982 .

[8]  Katherine J. Stewart,et al.  The Impact of Ideology on Effectiveness in Open Source Software Development Teams , 2006, MIS Q..

[9]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel , 2003 .

[10]  Sonali K. Shah.  Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[11]  D. Zeitlyn.  Gift economies in the development of open source software: anthropological reflections , 2003 .

[12]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  The Promise of Research on Open Source Software , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Utpal M. Dholakia,et al.  Open Source Software User Communities: A Study of Participation in Linux User Groups , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[14]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Multiple routes for social influence: The role of compliance, internalization and social identity. , 2002 .

[15]  T. Parsons,et al.  The Structure of Social Action , 1938 .

[16]  Jan Ljungberg,et al.  Open source movements as a model for organising , 2000, ECIS.

[17]  Magnus Bergquist,et al.  The power of gifts: organizing social relationships in open source communities , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[18]  H. Tajfel.  Social identity and intergroup behaviour , 1974 .

[19]  Eric A. von Hippel,et al.  How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance? , 2000 .

[20]  K. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation , 1990 .

[21]  H. Tajfel.  Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[22]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 1999 .

[23]  T. M. Amabile,et al.  The Work Preference Inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Portfolios of Control Modes and IS Project Management , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Cultures of Work Organizations. , 1992 .

[26]  Steven P. Brown,et al.  ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF SALESPERSON JOB SATISFACTION: META ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT OF CAUSAL EFFECTS , 1993 .

[27]  John P. Meyer,et al.  The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization , 1990 .

[28]  Budi Arief,et al.  focus developing with open source software The Many Meanings of Open Source , 2022 .

[29]  M. Konovsky,et al.  Citizenship behavior and social exchange. , 1994, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[30]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects , 2007 .

[31]  M. Christen,et al.  Job Satisfaction, Job Performance, and Effort: A Reexamination Using Agency Theory , 2006 .

[32]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Self‐categorisation, commitment to the group and group self‐esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity , 1999 .

[33]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[34]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The Cathedral & the Bazaar , 1999 .

[35]  William A. Kahn.  Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work , 1990 .

[36]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[37]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Impacts of License Choice and Organizational Sponsorship on User Interest and Development Activity in Open Source Software Projects , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  R. Kanfer.  Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. , 1990 .

[39]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  The Transformation of Open Source Software , 2006, MIS Q..

[40]  Roy T. Fielding,et al.  Delayed Returns to Open Source Participation: An Empirical Analysis of the Apache HTTP Server Project * , 2002 .

[41]  Alexander Hars,et al.  Working for free? Motivations of participating in open source projects , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[42]  J. Hollenbeck,et al.  An empirical examination of the antecedents of commitment to difficult goals. , 1989 .

[43]  Gillian B. Yeo,et al.  A multilevel analysis of effort, practice, and performance: effects; of ability, conscientiousness, and goal orientation. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[44]  Fred Niederman,et al.  Research Agenda for Studying Open Source II: View Through the Lens of Referent Discipline Theories , 2006, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[46]  R. Stallman.  Why software should be free , 1990 .

[47]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Satisfying Heterogeneous User Needs Via Innovation Toolkits: The Case of Apache Security Software , 2002 .

[48]  Walt Scacchi,et al.  Mobilization of software developers: the free software movement , 2008, Inf. Technol. People.

[49]  Harvey Pinney.  The Structure of Social Action , 1940, Ethics.