Recording from Two Neurons: Second-Order Stimulus Reconstruction from Spike Trains and Population Coding

We study the reconstruction of visual stimuli from spike trains, representing the reconstructed stimulus by a Volterra series up to second order. We illustrate this procedure in a prominent example of spiking neurons, recording simultaneously from the two H1 neurons located in the lobula plate of the fly Chrysomya megacephala. The fly views two types of stimuli, corresponding to rotational and translational displacements. Second-order reconstructions require the manipulation of potentially very large matrices, which obstructs the use of this approach when there are many neurons. We avoid the computation and inversion of these matrices using a convenient set of basis functions to expand our variables in. This requires approximating the spike train four-point functions by combinations of two-point functions similar to relations, which would be true for gaussian stochastic processes. In our test case, this approximation does not reduce the quality of the reconstruction. The overall contribution to stimulus reconstruction of the second-order kernels, measured by the mean squared error, is only about 5 of the first-order contribution. Yet at specific stimulus-dependent instants, the addition of second-order kernels represents up to 100 improvement, but only for rotational stimuli. We present a perturbative scheme to facilitate the application of our method to weakly correlated neurons.

[1]  Lírio Onofre Baptista de Almeida,et al.  VSImG: A high frame rate bitmap based display system for neuroscience research , 2011, Neurocomputing.

[2]  R. de Figueiredo The Volterra and Wiener theories of nonlinear systems , 1982, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  Alexander Borst,et al.  The Intrinsic Electrophysiological Characteristics of Fly Lobula Plate Tangential Cells: III. Visual Response Properties , 1999, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[4]  G D Lewen,et al.  Reproducibility and Variability in Neural Spike Trains , 1997, Science.

[5]  M. Schetzen The Volterra and Wiener Theories of Nonlinear Systems , 1980 .

[6]  A Borst,et al.  Recurrent Network Interactions Underlying Flow-Field Selectivity of Visual Interneurons , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Holger G Krapp Sensory Integration: Neuronal Adaptations for Robust Visual Self-Motion Estimation , 2009, Current Biology.

[8]  William Bialek,et al.  Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code , 1996 .

[9]  William Bialek,et al.  Reading a Neural Code , 1991, NIPS.

[10]  K. Hausen The Lobula-Complex of the Fly: Structure, Function and Significance in Visual Behaviour , 1984 .

[11]  K. Hausen Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[12]  William Bialek,et al.  Synergy in a Neural Code , 2000, Neural Computation.

[13]  A. Borst,et al.  Input Organization of Multifunctional Motion-Sensitive Neurons in the Blowfly , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Electrical Coupling of Lobula Plate Tangential Cells to a Heterolateral Motion-Sensitive Neuron in the Fly , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  K Hausen Monokulare und binokulare Bewegungsauswertung in der Lobula plate der Fliege , 1981 .

[16]  C. Gardiner Handbook of Stochastic Methods , 1983 .