Impacts of Geometrical Manufacturing Quality on the Visual Product Experience

Geometrical variation, stemming from the manufacturing process, can distort the intended appearance of a product. When adapting a proposed design to manufacture, decisions need to be made on what geometrical deviations can be accepted on a final product. However, little research has been conducted to understand their actual impacts on the product experience. A study is presented, where we investigate differences between consumer assessments of photographs of products with a prominent geometrical deviation and equivalent products with good geometrical quality. The results show that for products perceived as having high industrial design emphasis, poor manufacturing quality can influence a number of quality-related assessments. However, product aesthetics was not influenced by geometrical deviations, indicating that product aesthetics is primarily judged based on what is interpreted as the intended design. The interpretation of producer intent is demonstrated as a key factor determining consequences of geometrical deviations. Further, it is suggested that the visual experiences of products with poor geometrical quality can be negatively affected without full consumer awareness.

[1]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Representing Artefacts as Media: Modelling the Relationship Between Designer Intent and Consumer Experience , 2008 .

[2]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Modelling perceptions of craftsmanship in vehicle interior design , 2011 .

[3]  Maurice Pillet,et al.  Sensory perception of surfaces quality - Industrial practices and prospects , 2010 .

[4]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Cue Utilization in the Quality Perception Process , 1972 .

[5]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Effects of Variation on Perceived Quality , 2013 .

[6]  Peter M. Dew,et al.  A Virtual Environment for Aesthetic Quality Assessment of Flexible Assemblies in the Automotive Design Process , 2002 .

[7]  N. Kano,et al.  Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality , 1984 .

[8]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[9]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Improving Decision Making by Simulating and Visualizing Geometrical Variation in Non-rigid Assemblies , 2008 .

[10]  Andy Field,et al.  Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[11]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  A cross-cultural study of users' craftsmanship perceptions in vehicle interior design , 2009 .

[12]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Computer Aided Assembly Robustness Evaluation , 1999 .

[13]  P. Clarkson,et al.  Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design , 2004 .

[14]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  MODELING CUSTOMER PERCEPTIONS OF CRAFTSMANSHIP IN VEHICLE INTERIOR DESIGN , 2004 .

[15]  P. Clarkson,et al.  Design as communication: exploring the validity and utility of relating intention to interpretation , 2008 .

[16]  Hans C.M. van Trijp,et al.  Perceived quality: a market driven and consumer oriented approach. , 1995 .

[17]  Anders Warell,et al.  Multi‐modal visual experience of brand‐specific automobile design , 2008 .

[18]  J. Steenkamp Conceptual model of the quality perception process , 1990 .

[19]  Stephen Evans,et al.  Understanding luxury in the premium automotive industry , 2007, DPPI.

[20]  Mariëlle E. H. Creusen,et al.  The Different Roles of Product Appearance in Consumer Choice , 2005 .

[21]  Peter M. Dew,et al.  Visualizing the impact of tolerances on cosmetic product quality , 2001 .

[22]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  VISUAL SENSITIVITY: COMMUNICATING POOR QUALITY , 2006 .

[23]  Myung Hwan Yun,et al.  Affective Evaluation of Vehicle Interior Craftsmanship: Systematic Checklists for Touch/Feel Quality of Surface-Covering Material , 2004 .

[24]  P. Desmet,et al.  Framework of product experience , 2007 .

[25]  Lawrence K. Waters,et al.  Product quality ratings as a function of availability of intrinsic product cues and price information. , 1975 .

[26]  Björn Falk,et al.  Product Quality from the Customers' Perspective - Systematic Elicitation and Deployment of Perceived Quality Information , 2009, DET.

[27]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Defining Quality Appearance Index Weights by Combining VR and CAT Technologies , 2001 .

[28]  D. Garvin Competing on the Eight Dimensions of Quality , 1987 .

[29]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Intrinsic versus extrinsic cues as determinants of perceived product quality. , 1974 .

[30]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[31]  MariAnne Karlsson,et al.  Investigating the haptic aspects of verbalised product experiences , 2010 .